Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: Does prolonged stimulation justify cancellation ofin vitrofertilization cycles? (original) (raw)

Repeated in vitro fertilization cycle attempts in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists

Raoul Orvieto

Fertility and Sterility, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI

Konstantinos Dafopoulos

In Vivo

View PDFchevron_right

Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial

Manuel Fernández-sánchez

Fertility and Sterility, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Impact of changing the ovarian hyperstimulation protocol in the sequental cycle on ICSI outcomes in the same patient population

Berna Dilbaz

Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Milder is better? advantages and disadvantages of "mild" ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization

Alberto Revelli

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF)

Valeria Vanni

Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Is the modified natural in vitro fertilization cycle justified in patients with “genuine” poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?

Gil M Yerushalmi

Fertility and Sterility, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Minimal ovarian stimulation for IVF: appraisal of potential benefits and drawbacks

B. Fauser, William Crowley

Human Reproduction, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Hopes and facts about mild ovarian stimulation

Marcello Iacobelli

Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of IVF Outcomes between Minimal Stimulation and High-Dose Stimulation for Patients with Poor Ovarian Reserve

Karen Glass

International Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: Determination of the Efficiency of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Suppression Cycle Using the Initial Follicle Count During Gonadotropin Stimulation

Hsueh-wen Chang

2001

View PDFchevron_right

Analysis of the relationship between duration of ovarian stimulation and pregnancy rates in IVF patients

Angela Palumbo

Fertility and Sterility, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Mild stimulation approach for In Vitro Fertilization treatment: Retrospective data from one Danish Centre

Svend Lindenberg

PubMed, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

A mild ovarian stimulation strategy in women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing IVF: a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial

Marwan Alhalabi

Human Reproduction

View PDFchevron_right

Ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization with or without the “long” gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol: effect on cycle duration and outcome

Shahar Kol, Ron Beloosesky

Fertility and Sterility, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Minimal monitoring of ovarian hyperstimulation: a useful simplification of the clinical phase of in vitro fertilization treatment

Arne van Heusden

Fertility and Sterility, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Effect of repeated assisted reproductive technology cycles on ovarian response

Kaan Osmanagaoglu, Michel Camus

Fertility and Sterility, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: 10 years later

Bart CJM Fauser

Human Reproduction, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy

naima mansouri

Reproductive health, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Improvements in Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization

Joelle Belaisch-Allart

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria

anna pia ferraretti

Human Reproduction, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Predictors of success during the coasting period in high-responder patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception

ulun ulug

Fertility and Sterility, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization: two decades of experience after the birth of Elizabeth Carr

Murat Arslan

Fertility and Sterility, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Low serum estradiol concentrations after five days of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization are associated with poor outcome

Y. Khalaf

Fertility and sterility, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization

Bart CJM Fauser

Endocrine Reviews, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of outcomes and direct cost between minimal stimulation and conventional protocols on ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization

A. Rojanasakul

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Day 4 Estradiol Levels Predict Pregnancy Success in Women Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF

John Phelps, Adam Levine

Fertility and Sterility, 2000

View PDFchevron_right