Crossing symbolic boundaries: Can precarity mobilize the political disaffection of Latvians and Russophones? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Latvia's 'Russian left': Trapped between ethnic, socialist and social democratic identities
This chapter explores the responses of Latvia's left wing parties to the 2008 economic crisis. It is argued that, because Latvia's political spectrum can be characterised in terms of ethnic, rather than ideological, cleavages, the responses of the country’s radical left have been heavily constrained by ethnic considerations that are peculiar to Latvia’s post-Soviet political environment. The conflation of ethnic and ideological ‘leftness’ explains the ultimate failure of leftist parties to gain wider political and social traction in Latvia. Crucially, it has almost entirely prevented the country’s extant radical left from moving beyond its communist roots and articulating an anti-austerity message that could transcend ethnic cleavages.
Synthesis and conflict: Russian-speakers' discursive response to Latvia's nationalising state
Based on media discourse analysis, this article addresses the construction of Russian-speaking identity in Latvia from a discourse-theoretical approach. Through a focus on the discursive elements of identity formation it will be argued that public projections of Russian-speaking identity are both a counter-reaction to, and a synthesis with, constructed ‘Latvian’, ‘Russian’ and ‘European’ identities and discourses. It will be shown that although Latvia's Russian-speaking identity is often constructed negatively, in opposition to the Latvian state and the Latvian ‘Other’, it is now increasingly premised upon an acceptance of various Latvian narratives and discourses which are enabling the emergence of a more positive Latvian–Russian identity.
Cross-regional Ethnopolitics in Central and Eastern Europe: Lessons from the Western Balkans and the Baltic States, 2022, (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke), 2022
Source https://www.pmlp.gov.lv/. Accessed 5 May 2021 ethnic Russians); their external homelands (Russia 3 and Hungary); and the, structured as well as informal, engagement of the EU. Although Latvia is a full-fledged member state of the EU since 2004 and Serbia is stranded along a complicated and non-linear accession process (Table AQ1 5.1), 4 the management of ethnic relations has been mediated, to varying degrees, by geopolitical concerns in both countries. This provides a crucial common denominator between the two cases (Petsinis, 2020b, p. 107). The varying intersections between ethnopolitics and geopolitics have been commonplace in ethnically diverse societies across Central and Eastern Europe (e.g. the cases of Estonia, Slovakia, Romania, and Croatia) since the 1990s. This chapter demonstrates that the more powerful the nexus between domestic ethnopolitics and regional geopolitics, the less feasible it becomes to liberalise minority policies within given states. Of particular interest is to illustrate how political processes such as systemic transformation can bring about the relaxation of the nexus that 3 In this chapter, Russia is seen as the state that operates as the 'external homeland' of Latvia's Russian-speakers in the field of foreign policy. By July 2018, 542,469 ethnic Russians were estimated to reside in Latvia (Table 5.1).
Geopolitics, Ethnopolitics and the EU: The Cases of Serbia and Latvia [Ethnopolitics]
This work is a study on the patterns of managing ethnic relations in Serbia and Latvia. It aims at enhancing the cross-regional exchange of knowledge between the Western Balkans and the Baltic States. This study demonstrates that as the bond between geopolitics and ethnopolitics grows more powerful, the liberalization of minority policies would become less feasible within a state. It also hints that the intersection between geopolitics and ethnopolitics should not be perceived as 'fixed' but it can be subject to fluctuations and readjustments.
Latvian Nationalism and the Construction of ‘Latgalian Identity’
2014
Since the early 1990s, when Latvia regained its independence from the Soviet Union (1991), Latvia’s historical region of Latgale has become a site of unending political activism aimed at opposing Latvian nationalism. Claiming to represent Latvians of that region or Latgalians, political activists have been declaring that they are struggling against the ongoing state oppression of their distinct, regionally and historically rooted Latgalian identity and language, and have been demanding more autonomy in cultural, linguistic and economic affairs for Latgale. In this article I will attempt to reveal the wider historical, political and social contexts that are evoking, triggering and shaping Latgalian political activism. I will argue that Latgalian activism represents an attempt to invigorate an imagined Latgalian community that is separate from Latvians in order to achieve official affirmation of Latgalians as an inseparable part of the Latvian nation. I also engage in theoretical deba...
Between party-systems and identity-politics: The populist and radical right in Estonia and Latvia
European Politics and Society, 2019
The article explores party-based populist and radical right looking at the cases of Latvia's National Alliance (NA) and of the Estonian Conservative People's Party (EKRE). The research question is: How does the intersection between the specificities of party-systems and particularistic identity-politics either facilitate or complicate the political engagements of EKRE and NA? This piece demonstrates that whereas the Latvian party-system provides the opportunity structure for the inclusion of NA as a legitimate partner into the government coalition, Estonia's mainstream political parties keep on excluding EKRE from the halls of power. This occurrence is highly subject to the different ways that the two-party systems have been dealing with parties suspected of pro-Kremlin leanings (Estonia: Eesti Keskerakond/Centre Party; Latvia: Saskaņa/Harmony). Meanwhile, the socio-psychological campaigns of both EKRE and NA over immigration and the refugee crisis tend to interlink these two policy-areas with the collective memories of 'colonization' under the Soviets and the collective anxieties of becoming 'colonized' again by others. This socio-psychological strategy has enabled both parties to augment their public appeal.