Contemplating the controversy Exploring the Ethics and Realities of Euthanasia (original) (raw)
Related papers
Euthanasia: Murder or Not: A Comparative Approach
Background: Euthanasia is one of the most intriguing ethical, medical and law issues that marked whole XX century and beginning of the XXI century, sharply dividing scientific and unscientific public to its supporters and opponents. It also appears as one of the points where all three major religions (Catholic, Orthodox, and Islamic) have the same view. They are strongly against legalizing mercy killing, emphasizing the holiness of life as a primary criterion by which the countries should start in their considerations. Studying criminal justice systems in the world, the authors concluded that the issue of deprivation of life from compassion is solved on three ways. On the first place, we have countries where euthanasia is murder like any other murder from the criminal codes. Second, the most numerous are states where euthanasia is murder committed under privilege circumstances. On the third place, in the Western Europe we have countries where euthanasia is a legal medical procedure, under requirements prescribed by the law. In this paper, authors have made a brief comparison of the solutions that exist in some Islamic countries, where euthanasia is a murder, with Western countries, where it represents completely decriminalized medical procedure.
Medical, legal, social and bioethical assessment on euthanasia
Any reflection on euthanasia should be made from a medical, social, legal and bioethical perspective. Due to the multifaceted aspects of this issue, we make an interdisciplinary analysis with a bioethical assessment. As is known, euthanasia is based on the administration of drugs and other substances with the intent to cause the death of a person at their request or that of their representatives, in order to bring about death using a " theoretically safe, relatively quick and painless method ". This definition, in our opinion, doesn't intend to explain all the meaning of the euthanasia and assisted suicide practice in a country where the euthanasia law is legalized so we present this report to analyze the principal areas affected by the law.
Contact International Journal of Research On Social and Natural Sciences, 2017
Of late, euthanasia is a moral problem in medical science as well as applied ethics. Medical science has tried to solve the problem of euthanasia in various ways. In the present article we have discussed elaborately about euthanasia and tried to show that now-a-days euthanasia is an ethical issue in not only our country but also in the world. In the second part of the article we have tried to define the word 'euthanasia'. Thirdly we have introduced different types of euthanasia in details. Finally we have discussed about the morality of euthanasia. The article concludes that all countries must consider legalizing euthanasia because it can save millions of patients around the globe hours of grueling pain and suffering instead of dying a peaceful death.
Euthanasia: Socio-Medical and Legal Perspective
2014
Globally, the controversy on euthanasia traverses public opinion, decisions of courts, socio-medical and even legal discourse. In view of this, this paper considers, not only the general conceptual and ethical issues involved in euthanasia, but it also examines the subject from socio-medical and legal perspectives. The paper concludes that killing under the guise of compassion is potentially dangerous, morally reprehensible and ethically flawed. This paper however concedes that different countries should adopt alternatives suitable to their values and ways of life.
Euthanasia-The Right to a Dignified Death
In the contemporary society, ethical issues raise more and more controversial debates. This has also emerged regarding the concept of euthanasia, given that it involves the decision of the patient who is facing the last phase of his life. Since this issue raises more and more debates, we consider it appropriate to bring into discussion the ethical aspects involved by the decision of dying a dignified death.
Ελληνικό Περιοδικό της Νοσηλευτικής Επιστήμης, 2012
Introduction: Euthanasia refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. Aim of this review is to present different views and arguments about euthanasia and to discuss the Legal regulations and the way that modern societies confront the inevitable dilemmas that it brings in surface. A literature review was conducted on google scholar for articles about the theme using as key words: euthanasia, active, passive, pros/cons, legislation. Results: The results of the literature review came up with its pros and cons of it. Some of the pros are that it provides a way to relieve extreme pain, a way of relief when a person's quality of life is low and an insurance of the rights of dignity and self-determination. The basic cons of it is that it devalues human life, it has become a means of health care cost containment and that there are objections about the expressions of willingness for people under High psychological pressure or for population groups like older people with dementia or mentally ill. Under the pressure of the new circumstances in the last decades, Euthanasia became the subject of legislative interventions in a number of countries. But even the most complete regulatory framework cannot predict all the aspects. Every different case will always be a confrontation with important existential and emotional issues. Conclusion: Before resulting in Euthanasia, a person must consider the situation. There are a lot of circumstances under which euthanasia is a reasonable and responsible choice. Each case is different from another
Revisiting Euthanasia: A Comparative Analysis of a Right to Die in Dignity
Euthanasia is a practice that has taken place since immemorial times. And since immemorial times it has been controversial and a source of harsh debates. Throughout the last decades, many changes have been introduced in this field and many practices, until then only taking place without public knowledge, were progressively revealed and regulated. This paper aims, firstly, at clarifying the terminology and concepts usually used in the euthanasia debate and presenting, in a lucid way, the arguments that civic movements and authors resort to when defending or criticising the liberalisation of euthanasia. Secondly, it describes the legal and social situation regarding euthanasia in several countries, where cases and legislation have demanded greater awareness from society. Thirdly, it attempts to compare the different national situations previously analysed. Finally, it discusses ways of improving the present situation and finding better solutions for the regulation of euthanasia.
Legalization of Euthanasia: A persisting dilemma
Journal of Law Policy and Globalization, 2012
The euthanasia is one of the most debated issues in the world. The main focus of the debate has been weather euthanasia should be legalized or not. Euthanasia generally means a mercy killing. Contrary views and arguments exist in this regard. The present paper is a moderate attempt to examine these contrary arguments. The paper concludes with the observations that debate on euthanasia is still grappled with dilemma. This debate is continuing one as some people are of the view that the life is sacred and no one has got the right to end it whereas others say that life belongs to oneself so each person has got the right to decide what he or she wants to do with it even if it amounts to dying.
EUTHANASIA: Legal, Religious, and Medical Ethics Perspectives
Mohamed Khalifa, 2023
While technological and scientific advancement has led to rapid development in the medical sector and the pharmaceutical industry and thereby resulted in the treatment of major illnesses, some diseases still are untreatable and impinge on a good quality of life. This prejudice against pain and suffering has led some doctors and scientists to suggest euthanasia, also known as artificial death, to end the pain associated with some untreatable illnesses. It is a suggestion that is based on the ground that death is preferable to life. As more countries in the West have moved toward the discussion of implementing this recent practice, discussions regarding the ethics of the nature of the medical profession and its ethical and legal obligation towards treating patients and alleviating their pain and what that means came into question. Consequently, the law stepped in to intervene as the judge on whether to authorize or criminalize this emerging medical practice. This paper is set to: first, provide a brief historical overview of the context in which euthanasia as a medical practice came to emergence; second, clarify the meaning of the practice through an analysis of the medical perspective, with a particular focus on the ethical argument put forward by practitioners; third, engage in a discussion of religious views as well as legislative laws on euthanasia; fourth, analyze the contested claim that modernity gave birth to this phenomena. This paper encompasses two aspects: it engages legal texts concerning the development of the laws regarding euthanasia and then moves to a discussion of religious views and their influence on shaping the law of euthanasia, with a particular focus on Islamic sharia law and its objectives.
Foundations of Euthanasia: Some Moral Problems
2021
Death is the end of life. Human life may end in various ways, sometimes he dies in an accident, dies naturally in old age, dies<br> in disease etc., but in today's society some sort of deaths are most complicated issues in moral philosophy. Life is invaluable. Man<br> loves his life, he wants to protect and prolong his life. Everyone has the right to make their own decisions. But there is controversy<br> over the morality of his decision to end his life. In this paper I will discuss the relation between morality and euthanasia. In this way I<br> will mention the meaning of suicide, assisted suicide and euthanasia. I will analysis euthanasia and its moral foundations, what ethical<br> issues arise in the case of euthanasia and how ethical issues can be minimized, finally I will try to find out which situation is<br> reasonable for Euthanasia.