Endoscopic hemostasis followed by preventive transarterial embolization in high-risk patients with bleeding peptic ulcer: 5-year experience (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2008
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2005, 658 patients were referred to diagnostic/ therapeutic emergency endoscopy and diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ninety-one of these 658 patients (14%) had repeat bleeding or continued to bleed. Forty of those 91 patients were treated with TAE and 51 were treated with surgery. From the medical records, the following variables were recorded: demographic data, endoscopic diagnoses, comorbidities, lowest hemoglobin levels, total transfusion requirements, lengths of hospitalization stays, postprocedure complications, and mortality rates. The relative survival rate was calculated, and survival probability was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2009
Severe bleeding from gastrointestinal ulcers is a life-threatening event that is difficult to manage when endoscopic treatment fails. Transcatheter embolization has been suggested as an alternative treatment in this situation. The present study reports on the efficacy and long-term outcomes of transcatheter embolization after failed endoscopic treatments were assessed in high operative- risk patients. A retrospective review of 60 consecutive emergency embolization procedures in hemodynamically unstable patients (41 men, 19 women; mean [+/-SD] age 69.4+/-15 years) was conducted. Patients were referred for selective angiography between 1999 and 2008 after failed endoscopic treatment of massive bleeding from gastrointestinal ulcers. Mean follow-up was 22 months. Embolization was feasible and successful in 57 patients. Sandwich coiling of the gastroduodenal artery was used in 34 patients, and superselective occlusion of the terminal feeding artery (with glue, coils or gelatin particles)...
Preventive transarterial embolization in upper nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2017
Background: Transarterial embolization (TAE) is a therapeutic option for patients with a high risk of recurrent bleeding after endoscopic haemostasis. The aim of our prospective study was a preliminary assessment of the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes following preventive TAE in patients with non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) with a high risk of recurrent bleeding after endoscopic haemostasis. Methods: Preventive visceral angiography and TAE were performed after endoscopic haemostasis on patients with NVUGIB who were at a high risk of recurrent bleeding (PE+ group). The comparison group consisted of similar patients who only underwent endoscopic haemostasis, without preventive TAE (PE− group). The technical success of preventive TAE, the completeness of haemostasis, the incidence of rebleeding and the need for surgical intervention and the main outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: The PE+ group consisted of 25 patients, and the PE− group of 50 patients, similar in age (median age 66 vs. 63 years), gender and comorbid conditions. The ulcer size at endoscopy was not significantly different (median of 152 mm vs. 127 mm). The most frequent were Forest II type ulcers, 44% in both groups. The distribution of the Forest grade was even. The median haemoglobin on admission was 8, 2 g/dl vs. 8,7 g/dl, p = 0,482, erythrocyte count was 2,7 × 10 12 /L vs. 2,9 × 10 12 /L, p = 0,727. The shock index and Rockall scores were similar, as well as and transfusionon average, four units of packed red blood cells for the majority of patients in both groups, however, significantly more fresh frozen plasma was transfused in the PE− group, p = 0,013. The rebleeding rate was similar, while surgical treatment was needed notably more often in the PE-group, 8% vs. 35% accordingly, p = 0,012. The median ICU stay was 3 days, hospital stay-6 days vs. 9 days, p = 0.079. The overall mortality reached 20%; in the PE+ group it was 4%, not reaching a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Preventive TAE is a feasible, safe and effective minimally invasive type of haemostasis decreasing the risk of repeated bleeding and preparing the patient for the definitive surgical intervention when indicated.
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, 2013
Background: Management of high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) consists in a high-dose infusion of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with double endoscopic treatment. If bleeding recurs, a second endoscopic treatment is required. Surgical management should be performed in case of endoscopic treatment failure, or if a second rebleeding occurs. Arterial embolization of PUB has been shown efficient and safe in small retrospective series, but optimal medical treatment was not used. Objective: Prospective assessment of the feasibility and the efficacy of arterial embolization of endoscopically unmanageable PUB, after optimal medical treatment. Patients: All consecutive patients referred to our intensive care unit (ICU) for high-risk PUB received high-dose PPIs and underwent double endoscopic treatment when possible. Arterial embolization was proposed in primary failure to endoscopic treatment, in case of failure of the second endoscopic treatment, or if a second recurrence occurred. performed in 11 patients, was efficient in nine patients. Surgery was performed in two patients (one after inefficient embolization, and one with embolization-related complication). One patient died during hospitalization. Conclusion: Arterial embolization seems to be efficient for endoscopically unmanageable PUB. In our series, one patient developed severe complication related to the procedure and died. If arterial embolization could be proposed before surgery in case of refractory PUB, large prospective studies are needed.
Variable use of endoscopic haemostasis in the management of bleeding peptic ulcers
Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2002
Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that endoscopic haemostasis is beneficial for patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer. The relevance of such data to management outside of RCTs is unclear. Therefore we examined management of patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer in a UK teaching hospital. Methods: All patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy for bleeding peptic ulcer between 1997 and 1999 were identified from an endoscopy database and the clinical records reviewed retrospectively. Results: A total of 872 patients underwent UGI endoscopy for presumed acute UGI haemorrhage; 179 (21%) had an endoscopic diagnosis of bleeding peptic ulcer. Seventy nine patients had a peptic ulcer with stigmata of recent haemorrhage (SRH) but only 61 (77%) of these patients received endoscopic haemostasis (77% adrenaline, 23% combination therapy). Re-bleeding occurred in 24 patients with SRH in whom transfusion requirement was the sole predictor of re-bleeding. The re-bleeding rate among patients who received adrenaline was 25% (n=12), compared with 57% (n=8) in the combination group and 31% (n=4) in those who did not receive endoscopic haemostasis. Patients who received combination endoscopic haemostasis had an increased incidence of active bleeding (p=0.007) and an increased transfusion requirement (p=0.002). Eleven of 20 patients who re-bled had repeat endoscopic haemostasis, with 45% eventually requiring surgery. Conclusions: Results of endoscopic management of bleeding peptic ulcers in the unit studied differ markedly from those published by specialised centres. The data reported here suggest that increased standardisation of endoscopic haemostasis is required, especially in units with provision for emergency "out-of-hours" endoscopy, performed by several individuals of different grades.
Cureus
Introduction Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a medical emergency and a common cause of hospital admissions worldwide. It has traditionally been treated with resuscitation and endoscopic intervention as the first-line therapy. In this study, we assessed the adjunctive role of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in patients with uncontrolled UGIB after an endoscopic intervention. Material and methods A retrospective chart review of patients requiring TAE of UGIB which was not controlled by endoscopic intervention in BronxCare Health System from 2018 to 2021 was done. Patients who were more than 18 years of age and required TAE during the time period of the study were included in the study. Patients' charts were reviewed for patients' demographics, comorbidities, hospital course, imaging findings, esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings and intervention, and interventional radiology intervention and clinical outcome. Results A total of 10 patients were included in the study. A majority of the patients were male. Transcatheter atrial embolization was successful in all the 10 patients. Coils were used in seven patients while particulate polyvinyl alcohol 500 micron particle was used in two patients and vascular plug was used in two patients. Out of the 10 patients, four expired during the hospital course. None of the patients died secondary to UGIB. Three of the patients expired due to severe sepsis with septic shock secondary to pneumonia while one patient died because of respiratory failure due to lung collapse secondary to endobronchial lesion. Conclusion Refractory acute UGIB is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. TAE is a minimally invasive measure that should be considered early in the treatment of UGIB which is refractory to conventional endoscopic management. Our case highlights the importance of TAE in a patient with refractory UGIB after endoscopic intervention.
Impact of endoscopic therapy on outcome of operation for bleeding peptic ulcers
The American Journal of Surgery, 1993
Since elective surgery for bleeding peptic ulcer disease has declined, the surgical opinion is that patients who undergo emergency operation have more advanced disease and possibly a poorer outcome. We examined current mortality for surgical correction of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding from peptic ulcer disease. Between July 1, 1986, and December 31, 1990, 1,213 patients had esophagogastroduodenoscopy for UGI bleeding (659 with peptic ulcer disease, 219 with gastroesophageal varices, 152 with esophagitis, 83 with other causes, and 100 with no source found). Of 110 patients with peptic ulcer disease treated by endoscopic methods, bleeding was controlled in 90, and 20 required operation for failed endoscopic control. Another 22 patients had primary operation for exigent bleeding with diagnostic endoscopy only. The overall results in our series compared favorably with two pre-therapeutic endoscopy index series (Nottingham, 1982; University of Pittsburgh, 1982). Our operation rate was 6%, with a mortality rate of 7%, compared with operation rates of 15% to 27%, with mortality rates of 21% to 22% in the historical control series. In conclusion, we found that: (I) endoscopic control of UGI bleeding from peptic ulcer disease has decreased the incidence of operation compared with historical series; (2) overall operative mortality is decreasing; and (3) the major postoperative complication is rehleeding.