Localizing the digital: implementation frictions and digital governance in inland China (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of infrastructure, policy and development, 2024
The central government of China has intensively guided regional integration and policy coordination towards the development of digital governance in the last ten years. The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay was one of the most important regions of China expected to accelerate regional development through policy coordination and establishment of digital infrastructures. This article adopted the method of content analysis to explore the policy transitions of digital governance in the Greater Bay including policy contents (in terms of policy objectives and instruments) and policy networks. Based on our empirical analysis, we found that top-down guidance from the central government did not necessarily generate regional coordination. Different governments of the same region could start policy coordination from shared policy objectives and policy instruments and establish innovative governance frameworks to achieve consensus. Therefore, regional coordination could be fulfilled.
Competing digital capacities: between state-led digital governance and local data center tradeoffs
Information, Communication & Society, 2024
Governments worldwide are embracing digital transformation, envisioning limitless data capacities for public policy. However, this paper uncovers a crucial oversight: the neglect of material resources sustaining digital ecosystems. This paper introduces contested “digital capacities” in public policy, to show how the aspiration for unlimited data processing strains local resources. Through a comparative analysis of national digitization strategies in the United States and the United Kingdom, this paper reveals a disconnect between the sociotechnical imaginaries and infrastructural demands underpinning these strategies. The infrastructural demands are leading to social and environmental tradeoffs in regional areas strained by digital infrastructure development. I argue that these competing digital capacities – the capacity to govern through digitization and related resource capacities – provide productive data friction for governments to pause and assess the broader social and ecological costs of their national digitization policies. As such, this article emphasizes the need for policymakers to align national digital governance strategies with regional planning for equitable outcomes. By reevaluating competing digital capacities encompassed in national sociotechnical imaginaries, this paper highlights the urgent need for a balanced approach to digitization.
Media International Australia , 2022
Digital transition, or the shifting assemblage of the cybersphere, is a primary dimension of global transition. And China is a key driver therein, rendering the party-state's stance the starting place to trace transitions. This paper begins an effort to follow unfolding transitions. It highlights the governance of transition with a focus on the emergent cybersphere. By interpreting the 14 th Five-Year Plan, the planning instrument that expresses the party state's decree for direction and strategy and, just as important, analyzing the framing contexts, processes, and projects, we probe the ordering of the present and the future, the national and the transnational, and, ultimately, the power geometrics of the cybersphere, as externalized through policy words and deeds.
Governing by the Internet: Local Governance in the Digital Age
Journal of Chinese Governance, 2018
In what ways has the expansion of the Internet transformed local governance in China? Through analysis of over 2000 leaked official emails from a district-level Internet propaganda office, the article finds that the Internet has served more as a tool to enhance control rather than to improve governance at the local level. In particular, local authorities have prioritized Internet commentating tasks assigned from upper levels while keeping a close watch on negative publicity of both national and local problems. Their occasional responses to online complaints are often more likely to satisfy superiors and pacify the public rather than to address citizens’ concerns. Such a “ruling by the Internet” strategy may bring short-term gains such as preserving social stability on the surface, but may harm the regime in the long run with accumulated social dissatisfaction and a weakened state ability to discipline local agents and meet social needs.
The China Review, 2020
Using Hong Kong and Shenzhen in a comparative case study, this article addresses two important questions about digital governance: what its development sequence is, and the governance role of social media in the Chinese context. A content analysis is performed of social media communication by four sets of comparable agencies in the two cities, using the framework of e-government interconnectivity. Contrary to general expectations, our ndings show that Shenzhen was more active than Hong Kong in the governmental use of social media. e results also suggest that, against the normative and sequential models, there is no strict sequence or particular order of development that must be followed in digital governance, thus rejecting the stage-by-stage "walk before you run" hypothesis. A government can "leapfrog" or "run before it walks" in its digital governance, bypassing earlier stages of development. Furthermore, the study shows that digital governance is an important tool of institutional adaptation and development to enhance a government’s ability to respond to a dynamic environment of raising citizen expectations. State-led digitalization complements and compensates for the traditional and formal citizen–government interaction mechanisms, making offline and online institutions interchangeable and substitutable, and therefore also more interrelated and indistinguishable.
Observatorio de la Política China, 2014
Business and civil society have rapidly adopted information and communication technologies (ICTs) into their lives. Information technologies have become part of China‘s economic development through a rapid and evolving market for the Internet and E-Businesses. However, central and local management work still relies primarily on traditional communication forms. The purpose of this paper focuses on Chinese trends in e-Governance. A conceptual framework is first set out defining concepts. Conceptualizing e-Governance in the People‘s Republic of China in such a way that raises a number of questions. E-Governance comes with new opportunities, but it also entails many challenges. This paper explores the opportunities of ICTs, particularly improvement of public services, access to information, policy development framework, and citizens‘ engagement. It also looks at three main challenges: data, societal and political. The paper then presents some concluding remarks.
Making the China Data Valley – The National Integrated Big Data Centre System and Local Governance
Journal of contemporary Asia, 2024
The research takes an infrastructural perspective and reveals how contingent alignments, including the central state's initiatives, local government's role, and corporations like Apple and Alibaba, have come to negotiate, collaborate, and compromise in sustainable arrangements, and eventually bring about Guizhou Hub. The research shows that the grand strategies envisioned and supported by the central state are not enough; localising technological infrastructures requires key local leaders with business and political networks, and mechanisms of state-commercial complexes where intimate partnerships among governmental entities, state-owned enterprises, and private corporations are established, and mutual interests are achieved. This process is conditioned by a "frame of locality" and requires scholarly attention to a local perspective of infrastructural developments.
Madariaga – College of Europe – Foundation and Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies, 2014
The penetration of the Internet and opportunities involving Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have occurred at an escalating rate within the private sector in China. Technology initiatives have pushed the Chinese government to tackle access to information, transparency, and digital divides. China has more than 600 million Internet users and over 300 million micro-blog accounts; over 1 billion Chinese own mobile phones, of which more than 400 million are smartphones. The aim of this seminar is to present the evolution and development of e-governance in the PRC. Despite the fact that all societies and governments deal with similar issues with ICTs, each context presents its own characteristics. This seminar will discuss questions raised by the development of e-governance in China. Why and how has the Chinese government adopted e-governance? How does e-governance fit into the existing model of government in China? What are the opportunities and challenges that e-governance brings to the PRC, e.g. e-services and e-participation? How does the adoption of e-governance in the PRC differ from that in Europe and the developed world? A Seminar with Mireia Paulo Noguera, PhD Fellow at Ruhr University Bochum, Research Fellow at Fudan University Shanghai, Prof. Vincent Homburg, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam and Duncan Freeman, Research Fellow at BICCS. The debate was moderated by Pierre Defraigne, Executive Director, Madariaga - College of Europe Foundation.
Digital Governance in China: Dispute Settlement and Stability Maintenance in the Digital Age
Journal of Contemporary China, 2023
Drawing on intensive fieldwork conducted in China from 2019 to 2022, this article argues that the Chinese Communist Party is now widely applying a mode of digital governance to contain social grievances and strengthen social stability. Although digital technology itself does help facilitate dispute resolution and stability maintenance by more effectively defusing collective actions and preventing/settling social disputes, the political system and power structure under authoritarianism, to a larger extent, shapes and affects the operation and outcome of digital governance. Even though the party-state is committed to rule by law and promoting a digital governance 'by law and policy', the 'state of exception' is invoked when it has to rely on digital governance 'beyond law and policy' in order to serve the necessity of consolidating its political power and ruling base when social stability is threatened. However, this approach not only fails to construct an accountable state image but may also lead to counterproductive outcomes. The study of digital governance in China adds new elements to the explanation of the condition for a 'state of exception' under authoritarianism and also answers why the Chinese government tries to prevent and settle disputes while keeping creating them in the digital age.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019
In this article, we argue for an extension of current debates on smart urbanism in China by focusing on the emergence of urban platforms as a key way in which Chinese cities are developing into digitally-enhanced and governed urban areas. China has undergone multiple rounds of thematic urban development, culminating in a recent policy focus on the smart city and on digitally-enhanced urbanism. We argue that this has now evolved, and outline the rapidly emerging phenomenon of platform urbanism, which we conceptualise as not only confined to the policy sphere, but as stretching across the policy-governance-corporate nexus, the market, and urban consumption practices and broader culture. We do so by focusing on key themes emerging in contemporary platform-based digital urban development in China: a.) the rapidly developing geography of urban platforms; b.) a swiftly expanding mass of data and its implications for state-private sector power geometries; c.) domestic urban policy and practice mobilities, and consequences for the circulation of digital urban platforms between cities and across national boundaries; d.) implications for a reconfiguration of urban citizenship; e.) new configurations of urban materialities in the digital platform era. We conclude with brief reflections on data-led urbanism in contemporary China.