"Secretaries and the Authorship of New Testament Epistles: Evaluating the Historical Method behind the Amanuensis Hypothesis," Catholic Biblical Quarterly 87 (2025): 502–520 (original) (raw)

The amanuensis hypothesis has long been a popular method of defending traditional authorship claims of disputed New Testament epistles. Scholars who espouse this view maintain that in the Greco-Roman world secretaries were afforded the freedom to (extensively) shape the letters they transcribed. As a result, proponents contend that authenticity judgments cannot be based on the style or content of a given letter. While various objections have been leveled against the theory over the years, its methodological underpinnings have been largely overlooked. With a view toward the standard objectives and processes that define the historical method, this article examines how the amanuensis hypothesis has been constructed. It seeks to demonstrate the (methodological) fragility of the theory by focusing on its historiographic aims, argumentative logic, and evidential basis.