FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE GAUTENG PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT (GPG) DEPARTMENTS (original) (raw)
Related papers
Promoting 'Enterprise Risk Management' Adoption in Business Enterprises: Implications and Challenges
International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(1), 69-78, 2013
The study advocates the adoption of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) by firms. Despite the benefits of ERM, few firms have adopted it in Nigeria. The paper identifies factors which influence firms to adopt ERM, and explores ERM implementation challenges and benefits of adopting ERM. It also recommended a suitable ERM framework for use in Nigeria. Using the literature, the study establishes that the understanding of ERM, its benefits, factors stimulating firms to adopt ERM, and ERM implementation challenges are necessary to promote the adoption of ERM by firms in Nigeria. The study reveals that business enterprises in Nigeria have not understood and embraced ERM; hence, ERM is not widely adopted in Nigeria. The implication of the findings for practice suggest that: the understanding of ERM is necessary to facilitate its adoption in Nigeria; ERM must start in the boardroom in order to positively influence the way firms' thought about risk, and planned for eventualities; and firms should integrate risk management into their organisation's philosophy, practices, and business plans, rather than being viewed or practised as a separate programme. The government also needs to create a viable environment for businesses to thrive in order to appropriate the benefits of ERM to firms and the nation at large.
Journal of Accounting and Public …, 2005
Enterprise risk management (ERM) has emerged as a new paradigm for managing the portfolio of risks that face organizations, and policy makers continue to focus on mechanisms to improve corporate governance and risk management. Despite these developments, there is little research on factors associated with the implementation of ERM. Research is needed to provide insights as to why some organizations are responding to changing risk profiles by embracing ERM and others are not.
Enterprise Risk Management: Factors Associated with Effective Implementation
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
Risk management is undergoing a great change, as organizations shift from the traditional and compartmental to an enterprise wide approach. Consequently, enterprise risk management (ERM) is gaining global attention among risk management professionals and academics. The demand for the adoption of ERM has led to several companies embracing it, yet its implementation has become challenging. Research shows that ERM approach emphasizes a holistic approach for assessing and evaluating the risks that an organization faces as against the "silo" approach of the traditional methods. The extant literature shows that through the reduction of the risk that an organization faces, ERM is capable of improving the performance and value. The study used a non-experimental correlational approach to explore the relationship between the presence of a chief risk officer (CRO) and an audit committee (AC), and the support of top management (TM) in relation to the implementation of ERM. A survey instrument was provided to self-identified risk-management professionals who are members of Survey Monkey Audience Service database. The target sample frame requested for analysis using a power of .95 was (n = 119). However, the final number analyzed was (n = 134). Frequencies and percentages were conducted on the demographic survey items and regression and correlational analyses were also performed. The study findings show that there was a significant relationship between the role of a CRO, the presence of an AC, and the support of TM and the level of ERM deployment. The study also found significant correlations between management support level and CRO, and AC. In addition, a much strong positive correlation was noted between the presence of a CRO and an AC.
Enterprise risk management: Challenges and the strategies for success
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478)
The objective of this paper is to identify the challenges of implementing and adopting an effective ERM system and to suggest alternative strategies that could be pursued as countermeasures to those challenges. This study is based on survey data gathered from 379 respondents representing 129 companies listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange of Sri Lanka. This study found that the lack of availability of information to make risk-based decisions; the need to ensure that all decisions are made within the organization’s risk tolerance level, and the lack of top management support for ERM implementation; are the most influencing challenges for business organizations that obstruct ERM effectiveness. This study suggests that organizations should promote a good corporate culture that fosters ERM supportive internal environment. It is also suggested that the support of the top management and their commitment to being corporative with the firms’ ERM function without making ERM is the sole respon...
The Adoption and Design of Enterprise Risk Management Practices: An Empirical Study
European Accounting Review, 2012
Using data from 825 organizations, we examine (1) the extent of ERM implementation and the factors that are associated with cross-sectional differences in the level of ERM adoption, and (2) specific ERM design choices and their effect on perceived ERM effectiveness. Broadly consistent with previous work in this area, we find that the extent of ERM implementation is influenced by the regulatory environment, internal factors, ownership structure, and firm and industry-related characteristics. As to ERM effectiveness, we find that organizations generally subscribe to a key premise of the COSO ERM framework, i.e. that ERM should address the full set of risks that affect the entity's strategic, operational, reporting, and compliance objectives. However, our results also raise some concerns as to the COSO framework. Particularly, we find no evidence that application of the COSO framework improves ERM effectiveness. Neither do we find support for the mechanistic view on risk management that is implicit in COSO's recommendations on risk appetite and tolerance.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014
According to Economist Intelligence Unit (Economist Intelligence Unit Limited and SAS, 2008), risk management failure is one of the major triggers of the recent global financial crisis. Enterprise risk management (ERM), an organisation wide process which identifies potential adverse events and provides strategies to manage risks, has been suggested as an approach to combat the volume and complexities of the risks faced by today's organisations (see, for example, Beasley et al. 2009). Despite of the recent emphasis given to risk management by the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), there is scant empirical evidence on ERM implementation among the Australian listed companies. This study aims to provide some evidence on the extent of ERM implementation among the Top 300 companies listed on ASX. Questionnaires were used to collect data for this study. The outcomes of the study show that the majority of the firms involved in the survey not only extensively implement ERM but also extensively embed ERM into their corporate strategic processes. Further, they have also implemented the system for more than five years. Potential limitation of these findings are acknowledged.
Operationalising Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Effectiveness
Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 2014
Studies on ERM effectiveness appear to suffer from the same catastrophic dilemma as that of organizational effectiveness. To the best of the author's knowledge, very little research has been done on the effectiveness of ERM in managing risks. Based on the guidance from the COSO (2004) framework and the existing literature coupled with the insights gathered from semi-structured interviews, the current article aims to demarcate a workable model, and, thereafter, an instrument to be operationalized in ERM effectiveness studies. The findings suggest that the COSO framework is still relevant for ERM and that to improve the robustness of the effectiveness instrument, a multidimensional approach is key. This paper suggests a multiple model approach comprising a process model, system resource model and outcome model for measuring ERM effectiveness. Additionally, the perspectives from various ERM stakeholders of the risk, including the risk function itself, such as from the internal audit and finance or other members of the management team, may enhance the assessment of the effectiveness of ERM in managing risks. It is hoped that the model and instrument developed in this paper will encourage more studies to be conducted on the effectiveness of ERM in particular. From the practical standpoint, with some modifications to the fit, the instrument can also be applied to evaluate the effectiveness of ERM implementation in the respective organisations.
An Exploratory Study of Enterprise Risk Management: Pillars of ERM
There is a general consensus that enterprise risk management's (ERM) popularity has resulted from a response to pressure on organizations to holistically manage risk. Multiple frameworks for implementation of ERM contribute to an overall uncertainty regarding the essential components of ERM. This uncertainty carries forward to empirical studies of ERM where results regarding value creation are inconclusive. There exists no real consensus about what the principal components of ERM are; this has led to identification and measurement methods that are inconsistent. By using inconsistent indicators and measures of ERM implementation, it is impossible to compare ''apples to apples'' and arrive at conclusive and convincing results regarding ERM's ability to create value. This is an exploratory study of ERM aimed at determining the integral components of ERM based on how firms actually implement ERM dimensions. The result is the identification of four discrete components, or pillars, of ERM implementation; two prerequisite components related to the general internal environment and control activities of the firm, one component identifying risk management activities of the firm and one component with the defining attributes of ERM implementation. All four components must be implemented to have well-implemented ERM, but only one separates ERM firms from non-ERM firms. The resulting four components challenge existing frameworks to adapt to better reflect how firms implement ERM and can have a valuable impact on identifying and measuring ERM, leading to more informative empirical studies on the value creating abilities of ERM.
Modelling the Determinants, Barriers and Outcomes of Enterprise Risk Management Implementation
2018
Enterprise risk management (ERM) proponents held that implementing ERM to mitigate business risks in today's more complex and challenging environment also adds value as well as beneficial. However, the extant literature on ERM implementation is limited, mixed and inconclusive while concentrated on some geographical jurisdictions. Not much is known about ERM implementation among Australian companies despite the emphasis given to effective risk management and its related disclosures by the Australian corporate governance authorities. This study developed and examined, using PLS-SEM, a path relationships model consisting of determinants, barriers and outcomes of ERM implementation among a sample of 2009 Top 300 Australian listed companies. PLS-SEM results were proven to have predictive quality in terms of ability and power. Empirical evidence shows that ERM is widely embraced by the sample firms as 85% of them implemented the holistic risk management approach while the extent of im...
International Business Research, 2011
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a new concept of managing risks holistically and in Malaysia, such a concept is still relatively new among Malaysian companies. On a positive note however, the ERM concept appear to be receiving much attention over the recent years from various businesses and industries in Malaysia. This particular study aims to determine the level of ERM adoption among the Government-Linked Companies (GLCs) and to examine the influence of Chief Risk Officers (CROs) and Board of Directors (BODSs) on the ERM implementation itself. Findings of the study showed that the more established GLCs were more receptive to the adoption of ERM as compared to the less established ones. Also, companies that adopt ERM were found to have appointed the Chief Risk Officers (CROs). In addition, the quality of Board of Directors (BODSs) was also found to play a significant role in respect of ERM implementation.