On the Compatibility of Benevolence and Self-Interest: Philanthropy and Entrepreneurial Orientation. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Entrepreneurship Orientation and Philanthropy in SMEs 1
2011
The paper analyses the entrepreneurial orientation – philanthropy link in small and medium size enterprises (SMEs). We find that SMEs that score highest on entrepreneurial orientation construct, those that have foreign owners, and those that are larger, are also most likely to declare their commitment to philanthropy. Our results are based on confirmatory factor analysis combined with regression analysis, using a representative survey of SMEs from Lithuania. Our findings that the most entrepreneurial firms are alsothe ones most involved in philanthropy shed light on the micro foundations of the model of development that emphasises consistency between the business initiative and the social initiative.
2015
Prior researchers agree that small businesses are important community contributors due to their active engagement in broader social responsibility activities, such as philanthropy. Despite their purported importance to charitable giving and philanthropy, little is known about the factors that motivate small business owners’ decisions to engage in philanthropic giving. We integrate enlightened self-interest theory and the theory of planned behavior to examine how enlightened self-interest influences intentions to engage in philanthropy during start-up, which in turn impacts current levels of engagement in philanthropic activities. Our results suggest that intentions to engage in philanthropy at start-up do partially mediate the relationship between enlightened self-interest and engagement in philanthropy behaviors; thus, suggesting that entrepreneurs’ motivations grounded in enlightened self-interest influence intentions to engage in philanthropy and subsequent engagement in such act...
Social Responsibility and Altruism in Small- and Medium-Sized Innovative Businesses
Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 2014
This study examines the interview narratives of owners of 73 small and medium-sized businesses from a large metropolitan area located in the southwestern U.S. Our analysis focuses on owner discussions of their motivations and goals for starting and running their own businesses. Our findings reveal three central motivational narrative themes: (1) traditional business-centered success outcomes—a category we refer to as “Business is Business”; (2) owners’ personal and family well-being and fulfillment, labeled as “Business is Personal”; and (3) social responsibility concerns directed toward the betterment of other people and society more generally that we labeled as “Business is Doing Good.” Owner narratives typically referenced motives in more than one of these three realms. However, relatively, they expended considerably more time and energy discussing altruistic or social responsibility goals compared to strictly business or personal motives. Our study reveals the importance of norm...
Standing out and Giving back: A Legitimization Perspective on SMEs and Philanthropy
We argue that more dynamic small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)–ie those that are more entrepreneurially oriented, internationalized and high-performing-are also more likely to engage in philanthropy. Dynamic SMEs “stand out” and thus have a greater need to build legitimacy with external stakeholders by engaging in philanthropy. We find support for our propositions in a representative sample of Lithuanian SMEs and applying structural equation modelling.
2010
This paper uses emerging findings from an ongoing study of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. It considers the historical and theoretical antecedents of such philanthropy and its current practice. The paper seeks to develop theoretical understanding of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy by considering the relevance of Capital and Agency theories. The paper contributes empirically by presenting a discussion of the capital possessed by 100 UK entrepreneurs involved in philanthropy and considering the implications of these for their engagement in philanthropy. The paper contributes to current discourse regarding the nature of entrepreneurship while developing understanding of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropists.
MASTER THESIS SPRING 2017 THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SELF AS A MORAL ISSUE
The concept of social entrepreneurship continues to be vague and lacked a clear understanding of what the concept really is. One problem identified with the concept is the adoption of capitalism as a means of sustaining the social intervention. The adoption of profits and how they are used created a very big problem in both theory and practice. This study therefore tried to explore how donors perceived the use of profits from these interventions for the entrepreneurial self. This was done through a qualitative research. The findings showed that the profits from social interventions could not be used for purposes beneficial to the individual entrepreneur but only the project. The social entrepreneur could receive salaries, pensions and other personal emoluments but cannot use the profits for his or her own benefit. All profits must remain in the intervention for sustainability.
Social Entrepreneurship and Venture Philanthropy: A Conceptual Framework
The SAIMS 27th Annual Conference Proceedings, 2015
We set out to develop a conceptual framework that integrates the social entrepreneurship and venture philanthropy literature. We rely on entrepreneurship theory to do this: in particular, the perspective of entrepreneurship as an individual-opportunity nexus. This perspective is fitting since individuals interested in social entrepreneurship require the resources of venture philanthropists to exploit opportunities in the social space. In the move to understand how social entrepreneurs interact with venture philanthropists to solve social problems in a variety of contexts – within developed and developing countries, for example-we hope that our conceptual framework can serve future research as a basis to examine and compare this interaction against different contexts. We provide the " what " of this interaction so that researchers can proceed to better understand the " how. "