Euroskepticism in European National Elections: The Rise of Voter Support for New Radical Right Parties (original) (raw)
Related papers
Ideological voting for radical right parties in Europe
Acta Politica, 2021
The aim of this research is to examine to what extent the electoral support for radical right parties (RRPs) is driven by 'policy voting' and to compare this support with that of centre-right parties. Using the European Election Study 2019, we focus on six party systems: Spain, Italy, France, Germany, Austria, and the United Kingdom. Our analyses reveal that party preferences for RRPs are better explained by policy considerations than by other alternative explanations (e.g. by 'globalization losers' or 'protest voting'). Additionally, the results show that although preferences for both party families are mainly rooted in 'policy voting', notable differences emerge when looking at the role of specific policy dimensions. Overall, these findings suggest that the support for RRPs cannot be understood fundamentally as a mere reaction against economic pauperization or political dissatisfaction but instead as an ideological decision based on rational choice models.
Party Euroscepticism and the Conditions for Its Success: Conceptualization and Explanation
(co-authored with Eugenio Salvati) Over the years, Eurosceptic parties have grown in both number and electoral support, together with the politicisation of European Union (EU) integration cleavage within European national polities. The term Euroscepticism denotes different aspects and degrees of opposition to the EU. For example, criticisms can point to institutions, policies, procedures, actors, as well as the integration project per se. Moreover, Euroscepticism can refer to either voters or elites. In this article, we focus on national political parties. We propose a narrow conceptualisation of Euroscepticism, by linking this concept to the concept of anti-system party. Based on several indicators, we measure the success of Euroscepticism in the member states. In our analysis, we ask why anti-system parties emerge and gain votes in some European countries, and not in others. The empirical part of the article presents a preliminary configurational analysis of necessary and sufficient conditions of Euroscepticism and related electoral successes
APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper, 2011
Our focus in this paper is on two questions. The first is whether the current economic conditions and uncertainty about the future of the EU provide an opening for extremist parties, ones that have exclusionary policies at the center of their ideology; a related question is whether the determinants of support for such parties in older democracies and members of the EU resemble those in emerging democracies who have recently joined the EU. To answer these questions, we analyze the determinants of support for the French National Front (as a representative case of a radical right party from the oldest members of the EU/European Community), and the Greater Romania Party (as a representative case from one of the newest members of the EU), with special attention to the impact of Euroskepticism. Our analysis of data from recent surveys conducted in the two countries shows that most individual-level determinants of support for the two parties are similar, while being clearly distinguishable from the determinants of support for the mainstream parties of both left and right. Most importantly, not only authoritarianism, but also Euroskepticism has a significant and positive impact on support for the FN and the GRP, while having a negative impact on support for mainstream parties. Quite significantly, while this effect was already visible in France from the very beginning, it has become more significant in Romania only recently. These results indicate that both parties are in a good position to benefit from the current economic and political conditions by promoting a mix of authoritarian and anti-EU policy messages.
Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe
European Journal of Political Research, 2002
In this study we explain extreme right-wing voting behaviour in the countries of the European Union and Norway from a micro and macro perspective. Using a multidisciplinary multilevel approach, we take into account individual-level social background characteristics and public opinion alongside country characteristics and characteristics of extreme right-wing parties themselves. By making use of large-scale survey data (N = 49,801) together with country-level statistics and expert survey data, we are able to explain extreme right-wing voting behaviour from this multilevel perspective. Our results show that crossnational differences in support of extreme right-wing parties are particularly due to differences in public opinion on immigration and democracy, the number of non-Western residents in a country and, above all, to party characteristics of the extreme right-wing parties themselves.
The Rise of Extreme Right Wing Parties in the European Union: A Macroeconomic Perspective
Many countries from the European Union are facing a strong rise of extreme right wing parties, wining more electoral support from people who are disenchanted and resented with traditional politics. Even though many of these extreme right parties have existed since 1980s as a consequence of economic and political situation, after the Financial Crisis these parties have experienced a new backing from those areas of the European Union that have suffered the disastrous consequences of the economic context. Thus, the goal of this paper is to understand and check if there is a relation between the macroeconomic context and electoral support for extreme right wing parties, using regional economic and political data where these parties have become rooted and have provoked a shock in the electoral panorama.
With the lingering Euro crisis, personalized competition for the Commission presidency, and a surge of Eurosceptic parties , the 2014 European Parliament elections took place against an unknown level of European Union politicization. How does this changing context affect the supply side of party competition on European issues in EP election cam-paigns? This article compares the 2014 and 2009 EP elections in two EU founding members with high electoral support for radical left and radical right Euroscepticism—France and the Netherlands. We study publically visible patterns of partisan mobilization in the written news media with semi-automated content analyses. The data indicate that visible party mobilization on EU issues was on average not significantly higher in 2014. While particularly mainstream and especially incumbent parties publically mobilize on European issues during both campaigns, the radical right's mobilization efforts have become more visible during the 2014 elections. Examining the temporal dynamics within electoral campaigns, we show that the Eurosceptic fringes exhibit significant contagion effects on the mainstream parties, but that the extent of this contagion was surprisingly lower in the 2014 campaign. As a result, the increasing EU politiciza-tion between the 2009 and 2014 electoral contests has not resulted in an enhanced and more interactive supply of partisan debate about Europe.
In the wake of the harshest economic crisis since 1929, in several European countries there has been a rise of Eurosceptic parties that oppose EU integration. The 2014 European Parliament elections were a fundamental turning point for these parties. In this article, after a theoretical discussion on the concept of Euroscepticism, we provide an updated classification of Eurosceptic parties after the 2014 European Parliament elections. We show the cross-country variability of such parties’ results and present two hypotheses aiming at explaining Eurosceptic parties’ results, one related to each country’s economic context and one related to each country’s political-institutional context. Through a comparative approach and the use of quantitative data, we test the two hypotheses by creating two standardised indices of economic and political-institutional contexts. Three important findings are shown: Eurosceptic parties perform better in either rich, creditor countries or in poor countries; Eurosceptic parties perform better in countries with peculiar political-institutional features, such as high levels of party system instability and a more permissive electoral system; finally, and crucially, favourable political-institutional contexts seem to be more important than favourable economic contexts for Eurosceptic parties’ electoral results.
Government and Opposition, 2020
This article investigates three explanations for electoral support for the far right-'cultural backlash', 'economic grievances' and 'protest voting'-in a novel way. Our main contribution is that we contrast far-right voters with voters of centre-right parties, traditional left-wing parties and abstainers. Equally innovative is the comparison between mature and post-communist democracies. Using European Social Survey data (2014-16), we conclude that anti-immigration attitudes are most important in distinguishing far-right voters from all other groups. Yet, these differences are significantly smaller in Eastern Europe. Furthermore, far-right voters are not the so-called socioeconomic 'losers of globalization': this is only true when compared with centre-right voters. Concerning protest voting, distrust of supranational governance particularly enhances far-right voting. Overall, our study concludes that more fine-grained distinctions pay off and avoid misleading generalizations about 'European far-right voters' often presented in public debates.
Frontiers in Psychology
This article investigates whether the perceived threat of terrorism explains the support for right-wing Eurosceptic parties and Euroscepticism above and beyond other relevant variables, including perceived economic and immigration threats. We first examined the entire Eurobarometer samples of 2014 and 2015, and then conducted survey experiments in four European Union (EU) countries, that is, United Kingdom (N = 197), France (N = 164), Italy (N = 312), and Romania (N = 144). Our findings suggest that the perceived threat of terrorism has a small effect on the negative attitudes toward the EU above and beyond the effect of immigration and economic threats and other basic control variables. The relationship between these variables varies across countries and it is less linear than we might expect.