Effective avoidance of a functional spect-perfused lung using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An update of a planning study (original) (raw)
Related papers
Precision radiotherapy by SPECT lung functional imaging in NSCLC
Journal of Men's Health
Background: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) could be used to avoid the non-affected perfusion areas in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to potentially reduce lung toxicity. The aim of this study is to compare dosimetric differences between two different 3D-conformal treatment plans, with and without CT/SPECT contribution. Methods: Simulation Computed tomography (CT) scans were accurately co-registered with SPECT scans and three different areas, based on SPECT intensity perfusion, were contoured: low perfusion (LP), medium perfusion (MP) and high perfusion (HP). Two different 3D-conformal plans, with co-planar and nonco-planar fields, were generated; one without SPECT information (anatomic plan), and one using the perfusion area identified with functional imaging (functional plan). Results: 9 patients were planned and a total of 18 plans were available for analysis. Anatomical and functional plans resulted in comparable planning target volume (PTV) coverage. In the functional plans, a significant reduction of dose in high perfusion areas was reported. The reduction of HP-V20 Gy values ranged from 15% to 8% (p = 0.046), the ipsiHP-V20 Gy from 38% to 22% (p = 0.028) and ipsiHP-Dmean reduction from 16 Gy to 12 Gy (p = 0.039). No significant differences in other organs at risk (OARs) metrics were reported between anatomical and functional plans. Conclusions: Despite the few cases reported, the strength of our study lies in the reported benefit of functional lung information in 3D conformal radiation planning, without compromising target coverage or worsening dose distribution to the OARs. There is an urgent need for prospective clinical and randomized trials in order to define the role of lung functional imaging in reducing toxicity in clinical practice.
Clinical Oncology, 2014
Aims: Recent clinical series suggest that treating patients with isotoxic twice-daily radiotherapy may be beneficial. This dosimetric planning study compared the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) to deliver isotoxic treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials and methods: Twenty patients with stage II/III NSCLC were selected. A dose-escalated plan was produced retrospectively for each using three different methods: (i) three to five beams 3DRT; (ii) seven beams inverse-planned conformal radiotherapy; (iii) seven beams IMRT. The starting point for dose escalation was 55.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction twice-daily. The number of fractions was then increased until one or more organ at risk tolerance dose was exceeded or a maximum dose of 79.2 Gy was reached. Results: The median escalated doses were 70.2, 66.6 and 64.8 Gy for IMRT, 3DRT and inverse-planned conformal radiotherapy, respectively. IMRT allowed a significant dose increase in comparison with the other two methods (P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was found between 3DRT and inverse-planned conformal radiotherapy. IMRT was more successful at escalating dose in patients where the brachial plexus and spinal canal were close to the planning target volume. IMRT did not allow the escalation of dose beyond 70.2 Gy (82.8 Gy BED 10 , 69 Gy EQD 2 ) due to the proximity of disease to the great vessels and the proximal bronchial tree. Conclusions: IMRT allows increased dose escalation compared with conformal radiotherapy. However, there is limited opportunity to escalate the prescription dose beyond 70.2 Gy twice-daily in disease close to the central mediastinal structures.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1999
Purpose: To evaluate, preclinically, the potential for dose escalation of continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiation therapy (CHART) for non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we examined the strategy of omission of elective nodal irradiation with and without the application of three-dimensional conformal radiation technology (3DCRT). Methods and Materials: 2D, conventional therapy plans were designed according to the specifications of CHART for 18 patients with NSCLC (Stages Ib, IIb, IIIa, and IIIb). Further plans were generated with the omission of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) from the treatment portals (2D minus ENI plans [2D-ENI plans]). Both sets were inserted in the patient's planning computed tomographies (CTs). These reconstructed plans were then compared to alternative, three-dimensional treatment plans which had been generated de novo, with the omission of ENI: 3D minus elective nodal irradiation (3D-ENI plans). Dose delivery to the planning target volumes (PTVs) and to the organs at risk were compared between the 3 sets of corresponding plans. The potential for dose escalation of each patient's 2D-ENI and 3D-ENI plan beyond 54 Gy, standard to CHART, was also determined. Results: PTV coverage was suboptimal in the 2D CHART and the 2D-ENI plans. Only in the 3D-ENI plans did 100% of the PTV get >95% of the dose prescribed (i.e., 51.5 Gy [51.3-52.2]). Using 3D-ENI plans significantly reduced the dose received by the spinal cord, the mean and median doses to the esophagus and the heart. It did not significantly reduce the lung dose when compared to 2D-ENI plans. Escalation of the dose (minimum >1 Gy) with optimal PTV coverage was possible in 55.5% of patients using 3D-ENI, but was possible only in 16.6% when using the 2D-ENI planning strategy. Conclusions: 3DCRT is fundamental to achieving optimal PTV coverage in NSCLC. A policy of omission of elective nodal irradiation alone (and using 2D technology) will not achieve optimal PTV coverage or dose escalation. 3DCRT with omission of ENI can achieve true escalation of CHART in 55.5% of tumors, depending on their site and N-stage.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 2004
Purpose: To investigate dosimetric improvements with respect to tumor-dose conformity and normal tissue sparing using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and Materials: Forty-one patients with Stage III-IV and recurrent NSCLC who previously underwent 3D-CRT were included. IMRT plans were designed to deliver 63 Gy to 95% of the planning target volume using nine equidistant coplanar 6-MV beams. Inverse planning was performed to minimize the volumes of normal lung, heart, esophagus, and spinal cord irradiated above their tolerance doses. Dose distributions and dosimetric indexes for the tumors and critical structures in both plans were computed and compared. Results: Using IMRT, the median absolute reduction in the percentage of lung volume irradiated to >10 and >20 Gy was 7% and 10%, respectively. This corresponded to a decrease of >2 Gy in the total lung mean dose and of 10% in the risk of radiation pneumonitis. The volumes of the heart and esophagus irradiated to >40 -50 Gy and normal thoracic tissue volume irradiated to >10 -40 Gy were reduced using the IMRT plans. A marginal increase occurred in the spinal cord maximal dose and lung volume >5 Gy in the IMRT plans, which could be have resulted from the significant increase in monitor units and thus leakage dose in IMRT. Conclusion: IMRT planning significantly improved target coverage and reduced the volume of normal lung irradiated above low doses. The spread of low doses to normal tissues can be controlled in IMRT with appropriately selected planning parameters. The dosimetric benefits of IMRT for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer must be evaluated further in clinical trials.
Dosimetric Comparisons of Lung SBRT with Multiple Metastases by Two Advanced Planning Systems
Purpose: To evaluate planning quality of Stereotactic body Radiotherapy (SBRT) with multiple lungmetastases generated by the Pinnacle and Tomotherapy planning systems, respectively. Methods and Materials: Nine randomly selected patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung carcinoma with multiple lesions were planned with Philips Pinnacle (version 9.2, Fitchburg, WI) and Tomotherapy (version 4.2, Madison, WI), respectively. Both coplanar and non-coplanar IMRT plans were generated on Pinnacle system. A total dose of 60 Gy was prescribed to cover 95% of Planning Target Volume (PTV) in 3 fractions based on the RTOG0236 protocol prescription [1]. All plans with single isocenter setting were used for multiple lesions planning. A set of nine static beams were used for Pinnacle plansusing Direct Machine Parameters Optimization (DMPO) algorithm of RTOT0236 dose constraints. Planning outcomes such as minimum and mean doses, V95, D 95 (95% of target volume receivesprescription dose), D 5 , and D 1 to PTV, maximum dose to heart, esophagus, cord, trachea, brachial plexus, rib, chest wall, and liver, mean dose toliver, total lung, right and left lung, volume of chest wall receives 30 Gy, volume of lungs receives 5 Gy and 20 Gy (V 5 and V 20 ), conformity index (CI) and heterogeneity index (HI) were all reported for evaluation. Results: Mean volume of PTV was 37.77 ± 23.4 cm 3 . D 95 of PTV with Tomotherapy, coplanar, non-coplanar plan was 60.2 ± 0.3 Gy, 58.6 ± 1.2 Gy, and 59.1 ± 0.7 Gy, respectively. Mean dose to PTV was lower for Tomotherapy (p < 0.0001), so were D 5 (p < 0.0001) and D 1 (p = 0.001). CI was higher with Tomotherapy plans (p < 0.0001), so was HI (p < 0.0001). Maximum dose to other critical organs were also lower exclusively with Tomotherapy plans, as expected. Treatment time was recorded only for Tomotherapy plans (73.0 ± 20.6 min) while the Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) plan from Pinnacle were not registered for comparison in those cases. Conclusions: With 51 beam angles per rotation, Tomotherapy plans could generally achieve better tumor coverage Y. Zhang et al. 253 while sparing more critical structures in the multiple lung lesions study. Non-coplanar IMRT plans also have better tumor coverage with lower dose to critical organs such as lungs, liver, chest wall and cord compare to coplanar plans. Compared to the coplanar IMRT beam plans, Tomotherapy tends to have a relatively higher low dose volume in lungs such as V 5 which needs more attention for toxicity analysis.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2005
Purpose: Positron emission tomography (PET) with the glucose analog [18F]fluro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has been accepted as a valuable tool for the staging of lung cancer, but the use of PET/CT in radiation treatment planning is still not yet clearly defined. By the use of (PET/computed tomography (CT) images in treatment planning, we were able to define a new gross treatment volume using anatomic biologic contour (ABC), delineated directly on PET/CT images. We prospectively addressed three issues in this study: (1) How to contour treatment volumes on PET/CT images, (2) Assessment of the degree of correlation between CT-based gross tumor volume/planning target volume (GTV/PTV) (GTV-CT and PTV-CT) and the corresponding PET/CT-based ABC treatment volumes (GTV-ABC and PTV-ABC), (3) Magnitude of interobserver (radiation oncologist planner) variability in the delineation of ABC treatment volumes (using our contouring method). Methods and Materials: Nineteen patients with Stages II-IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer were planned for radiation treatments using a fully integrated PET/CT device. Median patient age was 74 years (range: 52-82 years), and median Karnofsky performance status was 70. Thermoplastic or vacuum-molded immobilization devices required for conformal radiation therapy were custom fabricated for the patient before the injection of [18]f-FDG. Integrated, coregistered PET/CT images were obtained and transferred to the radiation planning workstation (Xeleris). While the PET data remained obscured, a CT-based gross tumor volume (GTV-CT) was delineated by two independent observers. The PTV was obtained by adding a 1.5-cm margin around the GTV. The same volumes were recontoured using PET/CT data and termed GTV-ABC and PTV-ABC, correspondingly. Results: We observed a distinct "halo" around areas of maximal standardized uptake value (SUV). The halo was identified by its distinct color at the periphery of all areas of maximal SUV uptake, independent of PET/CT gain ratio; the halo had an SUV of 2 ؎ 0.4 and thickness of 2 mm ؎ 0.5 mm. Whereas the center of our contoured treatment volume expressed the maximum SUV level, a steady decline of SUV was noted peripherally until SUV levels of 2 ؎ 0.4 were reached at the peripheral edge of our contoured volume, coinciding with the observed halo region. This halo was always included in the contoured GTV-ABC. Because of the contribution of PET/CT to treatment planning, a clinically significant (>25%) treatment volume modification was observed between the GTV-CT and GTV-ABC in 10/19 (52%) cases, 5 of which resulted in an increase in GTV-ABC volume vs. GTV-CT. The modification of GTV between CT-based and PET/CT-based treatment planning resulted in an alteration of PTV exceeding 20% in 8 out of 19 patients (42%). Interobserver GTV variability decreased from a mean volume difference of 28.3 cm 3 (in CT-based planning) to 9.12 cm 3 (in PET/CT-based planning) with a respective decrease in standard deviation (SD) from 20.99 to 6.47. Interobserver PTV variability also decreased from 69.8 cm 3 (SD ؎ 82.76) in CT-based planning to 23.9 cm 3 (SD ؎ 15.31) with the use of PET/CT in planning. The concordance in treatment planning between observers was increased by the use of PET/CT; 16 (84%) had <10% difference from mean of GTVs using PET/CT compared to 7 cases (37%) using CT alone (p ؍ 0.0035). Conclusions: Position emission tomography/CT-based radiation treatment planning is a useful tool resulting in modification of GTV in 52% and improvement of interobserver variability up to 84%. The use of PET/CT-based ABC can potentially replace the use of GTV. The anatomic biologic halo can be used for delineation of volumes.
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2008
Background and purpose: Loco-regional failure after radiotherapy with total doses of 60-70 Gy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a major clinical problem. Escalation of radiation dose is often limited because of exceeding normal tissue constraints. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that a reduction in disease volume during radiotherapy detected by FDG PET/CT would facilitate radiation dose escalation, whilst remaining within normal tissue constraints. Materials and methods: Ten patients with localised inoperable NSCLC were prospectively enrolled. Each received standard 3D-conformally planned radiotherapy to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks. FDG PET/CT imaging in the treatment position was performed prior to treatment and repeated following 50 or 60 Gy. CT and PET-delineated gross tumour volumes were generated and a composite created. A margin of 15 mm was added in all planes to form the planning target volume (PTV). Treatment planning was performed to compare two dose escalation strategies: 78 Gy delivered to the initial PTV with treatment in two phases (shrinking field), i.e., 66 Gy to the initial PTV with a 12 Gy-boost to the PTV after 50/60 Gy. As an alternative planning approach the maximal dose without exceeding normal tissue constraints was evaluated for each patient (individualized dose prescription). Results: There was a median PTV reduction after 50/60 Gy of 20%. Delivering 78 Gy to the initial PTV could have been achieved in 4/10 patients. Of the remaining 6, delivering 78 Gy to the initial PTV would have exceeded normal tissue constraints and no benefit was seen when delivered in two phases. The results from the individualized dose prescription indicated a higher median maximal dose when treatment would be given in two phases compared to one phase resulting in a modest increase of calculated tumour control probability. Conclusions: Our data suggest that despite tumour shrinkage determined by subsequent FDG PET/CT during treatment the tested adaptive targeting strategy would result only in a modest improvement in the context of dose escalation. Further studies on the optimal use of FDG PET/CT and other approaches for dose escalation in loco-regionally advanced NSCLC are warranted.