Comparison of distinctive gait variables using two different biomechanical models for ankle joint kinematics (original) (raw)

Abstract

Gait analysis is an important instrument to investigate foot and ankle biomechanics in the field of footwear design. Results of this method should be objective and comparable. The purpose of this study was to compare two different approaches to quantify ankle joint ...

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (28)

  1. Al-Zahrani, K.S., Bakheit, A.M., 2002. A study of the gait characteristics of patients with chronic osteoarthritis of the knee. Disabil. Rehabil. 24 (5), 275-280.
  2. Astephen, J.L., Deluzio, K.J., Caldwell, G.E., Dunbar, M.J., 2008. Biomechanical changes at the hip, knee, and ankle joints during gait are associated with knee osteoarthritis severity. J. Orthop. Res. 26 (3), 332-341.
  3. Axmann, D., Gomez, G., Groten, M., 2002. Der Bland and Altman Plot -eine einfache graphische Methode zur Einschätzung der Verlässlichkeit von Messverfahren. Dtsch. Zahnarztl. Z. 57 (10), 613-616.
  4. Bachmann, C., Gerber, H., Stacoff, A., 2008. Labormessmethoden und ausgewählte Beispiele zur instrumentierten Ganganalyse. Schweiz. Z. Sportmed. 56 (2), 29-34.
  5. Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G., 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (8476), 307-310.
  6. Brandes, M., Schomaker, R., Mollenhoff, G., Rosenbaum, D., 2008. Quantity versus qual- ity of gait and quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis. Gait Posture 28 (1), 74-79.
  7. Cappozzo, A., Della, C.U., Leardini, A., Chiari, L., 2005. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. Gait Posture 21 (2), 186-196.
  8. Challis, J.H., 1995. A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. J. Biomech. 28 (6), 733-737.
  9. Cheze, L., 2000. Comparison of different calculations of three-dimensional joint kine- matics from video-based system data. J. Biomech. 33 (12), 1695-1699.
  10. Della Croce, U., Leardini, A., Chiari, L., Cappozzo, A., 2005. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark mis- placement and its effects on joint kinematics. Gait Posture 21 (2), 226-237.
  11. Ferber, R., McClay Davis, I., Williams, D.S., Laughton, C., 2002. A comparison of within- and between-day reliability of discrete 3D lower extremity variables in runners. J. Orthop. Res. 20 (6), 1139-1145.
  12. Ferrari, A., Benedetti, M.G., Pavan, E., Frigo, C., Bettinelli, D., Rabuffetti, M., et al., 2008. Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis. Gait Posture 28 (2), 207-216.
  13. Gander, W., Hrebicek, J., 1997. Least squares fit of point clouds. Solving Problems in Scientific Computing using Maple and Matlab. Springer, pp. 339-349.
  14. Hamilton, C., Stamey, J., 2007. Using Bland-Altman to assess agreement between two medical devices-don't forget the confidence intervals! J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 21 (6), 331-333.
  15. Isman, R.E., Inman, V.T., 1969. Anthropometric studies of the human foot and ankle. Bull. Prosthet. Res. 10 (11), 97-219.
  16. Lindemann, U., Becker, C., Unnewehr, I., Muche, R., Aminin, K., Dejnabadi, H., et al., 2006. Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional out- come in total hip replacement. Clin. Rehabil. 20 (5), 413-420.
  17. List, R., 2009. Joint Kinematics of Unconstrained Ankle Arthroplasties., (PhD thesis). ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
  18. Maly, M.R., Costigan, P.A., Olney, S.J., 2006. Role of knee kinematics and kinetics on per- formance and disability in people with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Clin. Biomech. 21 (10), 1051-1059.
  19. Mundermann, A., Dyrby, C.O., Andriacchi, T.P., 2005. Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. Arthritis Rheum. 52 (9), 2835-2844.
  20. Noonan, K.J., Halliday, S., Browne, R., O'Brien, S., Kayes, K., Feinberg, J., 2003. Interobser- ver variability of gait analysis in patients with cerebral palsy. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 23 (3), 279-287.
  21. Ryu, T., Choi, H.S., Choi, H., Chung, M.K., 2006. A comparison of gait characteristics be- tween Korean and Western people for establishing Korean gait reference data. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 36, 1023-1030.
  22. Schmitt, H., Rohs, C., Schneider, S., Clarius, M., 2006. Führt intensiver Langstreckenlauf zur Arthrose der Hüft-oder Kniagelenke? Orthopade 35, 1087-1092.
  23. Soderkvist, I., Wedin, P.A., 1993. Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. J. Biomech. 26 (12), 1473-1477.
  24. Weidow, J., Tranberg, R., Saari, T., Karrholm, J., 2006. Hip and knee joint rotations differ between patients with medial and lateral knee osteoarthritis: gait analysis of 30 patients and 15 controls. J. Orthop. Res. 24 (9), 1890-1899.
  25. Wolf, P., List, R., Ukelo, T., Maiwald, C., Stacoff, A., 2009. Day-to-day consistency of lower extremity kinematics during walking and running. J. Appl. Biomech. 25, 369-376.
  26. Woltring, H.J., 1994. 3-D attitude representation of human joints: a standardization proposal. J. Biomech. 27 (12), 1399-1414.
  27. Wu, G., Siegler, S., Allard, P., Kirtley, C., Leardini, A., Rosenbaum, D., et al., 2002. ISB rec- ommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J. Biomech. 35 (4), 543-548.
  28. Yavuzer, G., Sonel, B., Suldur, N., Ergin, S., 2005. Effects of intra-articular hylan G-F 20 injections on clinical and biomechanical characteristics of the knee in osteoarthri- tis. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 28 (4), 371-374.