Postcatastrophic Cities, Themenheft des JMEH 9 (2011), Ht 3 (mit Stefan-Ludwig Hofmann). (original) (raw)
Related papers
Cartographies of catastrophe: mapping World War II destruction in Germany and Poland
Urban History, 2022
Post-catastrophic damage cartography constitutes a serious research gap in the field of urban history. While fire and war damage maps have been made for centuries, qualitative analyses of these documents, especially from a comparative and transnational perspective, have appeared only recently. In response, this article tracks the coeval emergence of urban archaeology, heritage zoning and war damage mapping across Europe. Based on detailed studies of early postwar Munich and Warsaw, it demonstrates that damage mapping was as much about recording loss as it was about reshaping and reimagining Europe's historic city centres.
Evaluation of Urban Form in Historic Cores of War Affected Cities: Warsaw, Dezful, Mostar
2018
at the present time, the people of many cities are fighting and displaced from conflict. The war has once again entered the cities, the living space of everyday life and the private realms of the houses and the towns have become the military occupation. It is the unusual and exceptional status that has disrupted the intrinsic the identity and pattern of the city. The purpose of the thesis is to focus on patterns and physical configuration of historic cores, comparing the urban pattern of a historic city center before and after a war, and understand how much the physical form and urban tissues of a historic city center changed. And also identify how much physical changes are compatible with historic heritage. The hypothesis of this study is, the war affected cities are compatible with the past as the result of applying a convenient reconstruction program and a strong strategic framework, to preserving the identity and historical context of the city. The study examines the different a...
2016
In contemporary urban studies, the physical reconstruction of cities is achieving a new dimension, which is reflected in the urban resilience that is expressed as the physical, social, cultural and economic capability of urban structures to respond to anthropogenic or natural catastrophes. In this paper, we study the reconstruction processes of Minsk, Belarus, which was almost completely destroyed and rebuilt as a new city after World War II, in order to understand in which way specific social and political conditions may have influence on the physical rebuilding of urban and architectural form in “devastated” cities. We based our analysis on study of Master Plans from different periods. In particular, we focused on the Master Plan 1946 analysing its specific characteristic and linking them to political and social circumstances of post-war period. We conclude that Minsk was reconstructed as a model for a new Soviet city that brings us to a question: could the Soviet architecture and...
Central European Horizons, 2022
It is needed to reinterpret the concept of plots and internal systems in the context of urban structure and the built environment due to the urban planning decisions of the 20th century. The study deals with tears of historic urban tissues (roads, new urban structures), and settlement-like or individual enclaves of buildings in the post-World War II period. In the focus of the research methodology and criteria system of discussed in the study stands the street network (space syntax), the plot structure (urban morphology) and the construction, i.e. the relationship between buildings and open spaces (space syntax: convex analysis, visibility analysis; urban morphology). The criteria system, even the city itself, has several layers. The study of the three cities that once belonged to the Austria-Hungary, Miskolc, Košice (SK) and Subotica (RS), reveals the location-and country-specific nature of the structural changes and can provide a basis for further studies.
Post-Second World War Reconstruction of Polish Cities: The Interplay Between Politics and Paradigms
Urban Planning
By the end of the Second World War, many of the Polish cities—and especially their historic centres—were in ruins. This was caused by both bombings and sieges conducted by the Nazis and Soviets. The particular group of cities is associated with former German lands—now called the “Recovered Territories”—which were incorporated into the borders of Poland as compensation for its Eastern Borderlands lost to the Soviet Union. These cities started to be gradually rebuilt after the end of the war, although one can distinguish certain stages and types of interventions, varying from the restoration and idealisation of the pre-war townscapes (so-called “Polish School of Conservation,” which was developed along principles contradictory to the urban conservation theories of these times) to late modern as well as postmodern (called the “retroversion”) principles. This process is ongoing, meaning the reconstruction of the historic cities is not yet completed. At the same time, these processes wer...
URBICIDE AND DESTRUCTION IN EASTERN EUROPE: WARSAW, MARIUPOL, AND AGHDAM IN COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Wiedza Obronna, 2023
The term urbicide is generally understood as “violence against the city” or “destruction of the urban,” where urbs means “city” and cide refers to the “killing.” This term applies to a deliberate attempt to destroy a city or urban settlement. However, urbicide represents neither a supplement to mass extermination nor collateral to armed intervention, as its purpose is to ruin the city itself. The term was coined in 1963 by Michael Moorcock and has been widely employed to describe urban restructuring, mostly in Western countries. However, scholars began using this term in the context of destruction beginning with the Balkan Wars in the 1990s, especially after the “Siege of Sarajevo.” Besides the Balkan Wars, different types of urbicide have happened in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, including in post-Soviet countries. The present renewed interest in the topic of urbicide is connected with the wars in Syria and Ukraine. This study focused on the first incident of urbicide in modern warfare, Warsaw during the Second World War, and two recent cases: Mariupol in Ukraine and Aghdam in Azerbaijan. The author, by comparing different cases, posits that a warring party that embarks on urbicide might pursue different goals—not only to destroy a conflicting party’s defense, but also to erase the city’s cultural attribution as well as to prevent the future rehabilitation and return of the pre-war population.
SL - 38 East European Cities After the Political Change: Reappropriation, Security, Preservation
Anais ENANPUR, 2013
Main issues The session is aiming at a comparative analysis of the East European cities, mainly Budapest, Moscow and Prague, after the end of totalitarian regimes in 1990. The problems of urban development of East European capital cities can be analyzed from several angles. The papergivers of this session are proposing to demonstrate to interrelated phenomena through three themes: • reappropriation of the urban territories: new political regimes have chosen different paths to deal with the symbolic heritage of the previous political regimes and to refurbish urban territories by their monuments; similarly, the built environment of the communist period are judged in various ways, but certainly meant a counterpoint to post-communist architecture and urban design; • urban security: the shift towards open societies caused a certain unease at more open and, accordingly, more disputed urban space and lead to the rise of crime, which ended up in various techniques of property protection. The recent division of urban space into protected and unprotected areas modified the circulation possibilities in these cities and had a deep impact on social segregation; • preservation: the three cities possess a considerable built heritage, which attracts large scale tourism. They all belong to the UNESCO World Heritage List. National and international preservation legislation has a deep impact on the urban development of city centers in the last two decades. Critiques of this process most often refer to lack of architectural creativity in the era of preservation and to tourist-dominated city centers. These phenomena lead to serious social and cultural problems as well as to different solutions. Context It is hard to define what an Eastern European city is from the point of view of urban studies. The three cities in question represent three different modes of urban development, which were united by the ideological regime of communism for four decades. Their individual histories, however, diverge before and after this period, and it is an interesting task to spot the similarities and differences in the urban planning of these capital cities under the influence of a totalitarian regime. This analysis also serves to test and to verify the notion of Eastern European city, which is quite widespread in secondary literature. The intervention of the central power in the urban planning of the three cities is a common phenomenon. Prague, one of the largest cities in late medieval Europe, was an important imperial city of the Holy Roman Empire and a showroom of the imperial power. From the mid-19th century till the 1910's was a privileged place to express Hungarian national pride to the world and especially to the Austrian part of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. After the World War One, both cities were eager to demonstrate their national pride and/or their cosmopolitan character by installing art nouveau and modernist buildings. From its very founding, Moscow was destined to express the grandeur of the Muscovite/Russian Empire. Accordingly, all the three cities had a tradition in expressing the central power ideological and political message through their urban tissue. The communist regimes followed their predecessors practice in re-planning their capital cities. With the fall of communism, however, it is not just the traces of the communist regime are supposed to be removed or neutralized in these cities, but new guiding principles are expected to replace the old ones. These guiding principles do not seem to impose themselves so easily as they used to do in
2015
Scientific Committee of Conference:, prof. Lechosław Lameński (Catholic University in Lublin), prof. Beate Störtkuhl (BKGE, University in Oldenburg), prof. Jan Salm (University of Technology in Lodz), prof. Marcel Smets (KU Leuven, prof. Emeritus) prof. Mirosław J. Śmiałek (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Pedagogic and Arts Faculty in Kalisz), prof. Krzysztof Walczak (Wroclaw University), prof. Agnieszka Zabłocka-Kos (Wroclaw University).