Antibiotic treatment of osteomyelitis: what have we learned from 30 years of clinical trials? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Antibiotics for treating chronic osteomyelitis in adults
Reviews, 1996
Chronic osteomyelitis is generally treated with antibiotics and surgical debridement but can persist intermittently for years with frequent therapeutic failure. Despite advances in both antibiotics and surgical treatment, the long-term recurrence rate remains at approximately 20% to 30%.
The Antibiotic Use in Osteomyelitis Infection: A Systematic Review
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2021
Introduction: Osteomyelitis is a serious infection of the bone. One of the therapies for osteomyelitis is antibiotic treatment. Antibiotic treatment has evolved substantially, but bone infections are still a challenge. Antimicrobial therapy is also difficult, caused by antibiotic-resistant organisms. Therefore, a systematic review is needed to assess antibiotic use in osteomyelitis infection. Method: Articles were searched using Pubmed with keywords “antibiotics”, “osteomyelitis”, and its combination. The authors used five years publication date and English language to select the appropriate journal. Result: The author identified 13 relevant articles with antibiotics use in osteomyelitis. All of the cases were about chronic osteomyelitis and osteomyelitis in diabetic foot ulcers. Osteomyelitis in other sites of long bones needs longer duration treatment than long bone osteomyelitis. In acute osteomyelitis in children, antibiotic treatment can switch from IV to oral antibiotics. Fur...
The management of osteomyelitis in the adult
Bone infection Clinical management a b s t r a c t Background and purpose: Osteomyelitis (OM) is considered one of the most challenging medical conditions an orthopaedic surgeon has to face. Much debate is present concerning diagnosis and treatment, especially about differences between acute and chronic forms of the condition. The main aim of the present work is to show the key points where research should be implemented. Methods: Online database were searched to find evidence about the clinical management of osteomyelitis. Clinical randomized trials, case series, prospective cohort studies reporting on diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic osteomyelitis were taken into consideration. Cadaveric studies, laboratory studies, case reports, review articles and metaanalyses were excluded. Furthermore, studies concerning implant related OM were excluded. Studies in English, Spanish and French were considered in this process of inclusion. The cohorts of all the included studies were composed of adult patients.
JAMA Pediatrics, 2015
IMPORTANCE Postdischarge treatment of acute osteomyelitis in children requires weeks of antibiotic therapy, which can be administered orally or intravenously via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). The catheters carry a risk for serious complications, but limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of oral therapy. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and adverse outcomes of postdischarge antibiotic therapy administered via the PICC or the oral route. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing PICC and oral therapy for the treatment of acute osteomyelitis. Among children hospitalized from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2012, at 36 participating children's hospitals, we used discharge codes to identify potentially eligible participants. Results of medical record review confirmed eligibility and defined treatment group allocation and study outcomes. We used within-and across-hospital propensity score-based full matching to adjust for confounding by indication. INTERVENTIONS Postdischarge administration of antibiotics via the PICC or the oral route. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included adverse drug reaction, PICC line complication, and a composite of all 3 end points. RESULTS Among 2060 children and adolescents (hereinafter referred to as children) with osteomyelitis, 1005 received oral antibiotics at discharge, whereas 1055 received PICC-administered antibiotics. The proportion of children treated via the PICC route varied across hospitals from 0 to 100%. In the across-hospital (risk difference, 0.3% [95% CI, −0.1% to 2.5%]) and within-hospital (risk difference, 0.6% [95% CI, −0.2% to 3.0%]) matched analyses, children treated with antibiotics via the oral route (reference group) did not experience more treatment failures than those treated with antibiotics via the PICC route. Rates of adverse drug reaction were low (<4% in both groups) but slightly greater in the PICC group in across-hospital (risk difference, 1.7% [95% CI, 0.1%-3.3%]) and within-hospital (risk difference, 2.1% [95% CI, 0.3%-3.8%]) matched analyses. Among the children in the PICC group, 158 (15.0%) had a PICC complication that required an emergency department visit (n = 96), a rehospitalization (n = 38), or both (n = 24). As a result, the PICC group had a much higher risk of requiring a return visit to the emergency department or for hospitalization for any adverse outcome in across-hospital (risk difference, 14.6% [95% CI, 11.3%-17.9%]) and within-hospital (risk difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 10.5%-17.6%]) matched analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Given the magnitude and seriousness of PICC complications, clinicians should reconsider the practice of treating otherwise healthy children with acute osteomyelitis with prolonged intravenous antibiotics after hospital discharge when an equally effective oral alternative exists.
Causes and Management of Osteomyelitis
2019
Introduction: Depending on the infection's particular features (etiology, pathogenesis, extent of bone involvement, and duration) and the patient (infant, child, adult, or immunocompromised) a variety of challenges is present of osteomyelitis in long bones. Tremendous progress was made in the four past decades in the treatment of osteomyelitis as the many factors that account for the occurrence and persistence of infection have been found and a variety of antimicrobials with other spectrums of activity against microbes have been developed.
A Case of Acute Osteomyelitis: An Update on Diagnosis and Treatment
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016
Osteomyelitis in children is a serious disease in children requiring early diagnosis and treatment to minimize the risk of sequelae. Therefore, it is of primary importance to recognize the signs and symptoms at the onset and to properly use the available diagnostic tools. It is important to maintain a high index of suspicion and be aware of the evolving epidemiology and of the emergence of antibiotic resistant and aggressive strains requiring careful monitoring and targeted therapy. Hereby we present an instructive case and review the literature data on diagnosis and treatment.
Recommendations for the treatment of osteomyelitis
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2014
Keywords: Osteomyelitis Bone and joint infection Soft tissue infection Infectious diseases a b s t r a c t With the advances in surgical treatment, antibiotic therapy and the current resources for accurate diagnosis and differentiated approaches to each type of osteomyelitis, better results are being obtained in the treatment of this disease. After a careful literature review carried out by a multiprofessional team, some conclusions were made in order to guide medical approach to different types of osteomyelitis, aiming to obtain better clinical outcomes and reducing the social costs of this disease. Acute and chronic osteomyelitis are discussed, with presentation of the general epidemiological concepts and the commonly used classification systems. The main guidelines for the clinical, laboratory and imaging diagnosis of infections are discussed, as well as the guidelines for surgical and antimicrobial treatments, and the role of hyperbaric oxygen as adjuvant therapy. (P.R. Oliveira). ♦ The members of the Diretrizes Panamericanas para el Tratamiento de las Osteomielitis e Infecciones de Tejidos Blandos Group are listed in Appendix A.
Standard versus Specific Therapy for Chronic Osteomyelitis Treatment
American Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2007
58 patients with chronic osteomyelitis were treated either with a standard therapy or with a specific targeted therapy based on the antibiogram assay. Standard therapy was performed by a 15-day course of a parenteral cephalosporin (usually ceftriaxone) in combination with an aminoglycoside (e.g. netilmicin), followed by oral therapy with a fluoroquinolone (generally ciprofloxacin) for 1 to 3 months; specific therapy largely varied depending on the antibiogram response. The results indicated that no significant differences were found between the patients who received standard therapy (95.5 % cured) and those who received a specific therapy (93.5 % cured), after a one year follow-up. It can be concluded that a short-term combined parenteral-oral standard therapy, indicated in all those cases where antibiotic therapy must be started before obtaining the laboratory response, or when a clear and definite identification of the microorganisms involved in the infection is not possible, can be as efficient as an antibiogram-guided therapy in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis.
PLOS ONE, 2015
Osteomyelitis is a heterogeneous infection with regard to etiology and treatment, and currently no single management protocol exists. Management of the condition is typically an interdisciplinary approach between orthopedics and infectious disease; however, the orthopedist is often the person who manages treatment. The aim of the study was to determine differences in the outcome of osteomyelitis according to its treating specialty and to identify factors associated with the recurrence of the disease. An ambispective cohort study of 129 patients with osteomyelitis was conducted and the proportions for qualitative variables and central tendency and dispersion measures for quantitative variables were calculated; the latter were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A bivariate analysis was conducted with measures of association based on the chi square test and crude relative risk. A logistic regression model was applied and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, including the model of relevant clinical variables that fit the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. We found that 70% of patients were treated either by orthopedics or infectious disease. Patients who were treated by an orthopedist alone presented a greater risk of relapse or reinfection (RR = 4.6; 95% CI 2.3;8.9). Risk factors of osteomyelitis recurrence as determined in the regression model included the following: age of 57 years or older (RR = 1.3; 95% 0.3;5.2), long bones (RR = 1.9; 95% CI 0.5;7.1), fracture (RR = 5.0; 95% CI 0.4;51.4), monotherapy (RR = 3.0; 95% CI 0.6;14.5), receiving less than 4 weeks of antibiotics (RR = 1.5; 95% CI 0.2;10.1), inadequate treatment (RR = 3.1; 95% CI 0.4;20.1), and receiving orthopedics treatment (RR = 5.5; 95% CI 1.6;18.2). Most patients evaluated jointly by orthopedics and infectious disease received adequate treatment for osteomyelitis and had fewer relapses.
BMC Infectious Diseases, 2002
Background Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) occurs primarily in children and is believed to evolve from bacteremia followed by localization of infection to the metaphysis of bones. Currently, there is no consensus on the route and duration of antimicrobial therapy to treat AHO. Methods We conducted a systematic review of a short versus long course of treatment for AHO due primarily to Staphylococcus aureus in children aged 3 months to 16 years. We searched Medline, Embase and the Cochrane trials registry for controlled trials. Clinical cure rate at 6 months was the primary outcome variable, and groups receiving less than 7 days of intravenous therapy were compared with groups receiving one week or longer of intravenous antimicrobials. Results 12 eligible prospective studies, one of which was randomized, were identified. The overall cure rate at 6 months for the short course of intravenous therapy was 95.2% (95% CI = 90.4, 97.7) compared to 98.8% (95% CI = 93.6, 99.8) for the longer course of therapy. There was no significant difference in the duration of oral therapy between the two groups. Conclusions Given the potential increased morbidity and cost associated with longer courses of intravenous therapy, this finding should be confirmed through a randomized controlled equivalence trial.