Intellettuali ed egemonia: narrazioni di nazione-popolo (original) (raw)

L'articolo intende sviluppare una breve riflessione critica sul complesso rapporto tra indipendenza e autonomia intellettuale e affiliazione politica e partitica nei primi anni del Secondo Dopoguerra prendendo come modello paradigmatico il celebre dibattito tra Vittorini, Togliatti ed altri esponenti del Pci maturato sulle pagine del "Politecnico" sul finire del 1946.

Una lettura «Scrittori e massa» di Alberto Asor Rosa, "Tysm". Published 23 ottobre 2015.

The present paper deals with some main aspects of the work of two communist revolutionary: A. Gramsci and V. Lenin. Furthermore, it copes with the concept of ‘Hegemony’, its historical recognition and its subversive re-signification in the contemporary lecture of the Italian Marxist. As the phenomenology of autonomous class institution, the ‘Soviet Power’, in the work of Lenin, can be used to reconfigure a set of practices for the conflicts, in the process of subjectivation in the class war as well as in the process of collective self-government. The former part of the essay will be focused on the genealogy of this concepts, whereas the latter will analyze the possibility of a social transformation embodied in the General Intellect, based on the theoretical and political practices of the two Marxist philosophers

What is the role of the intellectual? And what is the relationship between culture, society and power? This essay attempts to answer these key questions by starting from the ideas that Norberto Bobbio had given us after World War II in the pages of his book Politica e cultura (Politics and Culture), in which he sketched a figure of the intellectual that was neither partisan nor Olympian, yet vaguely evocative of that Weberian wertfreiheit that already seemed a very problematic concept at the time. Bobbio’s words, which already testified to the crisis of modern public reason, had to be set against the postmodern atmosphere and its effects, its critics and its advocates. Did postmodernism authorise disengagement, inviting us to cultiver notre jardin? Should it be discarded in order to recover a ‘romantic’ image of the engaged intellectual, a sort of ‘Green Beret’ of culture? The proposal of this essay is that the intellectual should play the role of saboteur, only to find himself rummaging through the rubble of History that he himself has contributed to disseminating.

Intellettuali e uomini di regime nell’Italia fascista. This volume collects nine essays on political, economic and legal culture in Italy during fascism. The reconstruction of prominent personalities of the regime, such as Giuseppe Volpi di Misurata and Alberto Beneduce, are accompanied by studies analysing the at times critical, at times organic relationship between the regime and a series of reputed intellectuals, such as Vilfredo Pareto, Giuseppe Maranini, Jacopo Mazzei and Francesco A. Répaci. A chapter is dedicated to Edoardo Moroni, Minister of Agriculture during the Italian Social Republic, who after the war emigrated to Argentina, where he made a significant contribution to the agrarian reform of the country. This volume also includes two essays outside of the biographical trend: the first focuses on the theme of unemployment during Fascism, while the second presents the main aspects of the Urban Planning Act of 1942.

Recensione Mondoperaio luglio agosto 2018

In Il populismo tra storia, politica e diritto, a cura di R. Chiarelli, Soveria Mannelli, 2015, pp. 275-288.