Failure of epicardial pacing leads in congenital heart disease: not uncommon and difficult to predict (original) (raw)
Related papers
Circulation, 2001
Background-The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of all pediatric epicardial pacing leads. Methods and Results-All epicardial leads and 1239 outpatient visits between January 1, 1983, and June 30, 2000, were retrospectively reviewed. Pacing and sensing thresholds were reviewed at implant, at 1 month, and at subsequent 6-month intervals. Lead failure was defined as the need for replacement or abandonment due to pacing or sensing problems, lead fracture, or phrenic/muscle stimulation. A total of 123 patients underwent 207 epicardial lead (60 atrial/147 ventricular, 40% steroid) implantations (median age at implant was 4.1 years [range 1 day to 21 years]). Congenital heart disease was present in 103 (84%) of the patients. Epicardial leads were followed for 29 months (range 1 to 207 months). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year lead survival was 96%, 90%, and 74%, respectively. Compared with conventional epicardial leads, both atrial and ventricular steroid leads had better stimulation thresholds 1 month after implantation; however, only ventricular steroid leads had improved chronic pacing thresholds (at 2 years: for steroid leads, 1.9 J [from 0.26 to 16 J]; for nonsteroid leads, 4.7 J [from 0.6 to 25 J]; PϽ0.01). Ventricular sensing was significantly better in steroid leads 1 month after lead implantation (at 2 years: for steroid leads, 8 mV [from 4 to 31 mV]; for nonsteroid leads, 4 mV [from 0.7 to 10 mV]; PϽ0.01). Neither congenital heart disease, lead implantation with a concomitant cardiac operation, age or weight at implantation, nor the chamber paced was predictive of lead failure. Conclusions-Steroid epicardial leads demonstrated relatively stable acute and chronic pacing and sensing thresholds. In this evaluation of Ͼ200 epicardial leads, lead survival was good, with steroid-eluting leads demonstrating results similar to those found with historical conventional endocardial leads. (Circulation. 2001;103:2585-2590.)
Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2014
Many patients with congenital heart disease require permanent pacing for rhythm management but cannot undergo transvenous lead placement. In others, epicardial scarring prohibits adequate sensing and pacing thresholds using epicardial leads. This study describes long-term lead performance using a transmural atrial (epicardial to endocardial) pacing approach in patients with congenital heart disease. For transmural atrial (TMA) lead access, a bipolar, steroid-eluting transvenous lead was placed from the epicardium via purse-string incision or atriotomy and affixed to atrial endocardium. Records were reviewed for patient data and acute and long-term lead performance for TMA leads placed 1998 to 2004. Forty-two of 48 TMA leads remain active at last follow-up. Two leads fractured, 4 were functional at >5-year follow-up but no longer active. Freedom from lead failure 98% (95% confidence interval, 86%-100%) at mean follow-up 7.8 years. TMA leads gave excellent sensing and pacing charac...
Cardiac pacing in paediatric patients with congenital heart defects: transvenous or epicardial?
Europace, 2013
Cardiac pacing is a difficult technique in children, particularly in patients with congenital heart defects (CHDs). Few studies to date have addressed this topic. We performed a retrospective analysis of the results of a single centre. Between 1982 and 2008, 287 patients with CHD, median age of 5 years (25-75%, 1-11) underwent cardiac pacing for sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrioventricular block (AVB); 97% of patients underwent at least one heart surgery. Endocardial systems (Endo) were implanted in 117 patients, epicardial systems (Epi) in 170, with 595 leads (228 Endo, 367 Epi). Endocardial systems showed a significantly older age group with more frequent SND; Epi a younger age group, with more frequent AVB, greater number of surgical interventions. Perioperative complications were mortality 0.6% (Epi), pericardial effusion 0.6% (Epi), and haemothorax 3.4% (Endo). The median follow-up is 5 (2-10) years: the pacing system failed in 29% of patients, 13% Endo, and 40% Epi (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher risk of failure for Epi, a lower implant age, greater the number of leads implanted. The risk of malfunction of the leads increases significantly for Epi and the younger age when implanted. The steroid-eluting leads have a lower risk of malfunction (P = 0.05), steroid-eluting Endo leads provide significantly better outcomes than Epi. Cardiac pacing in paediatric patients with CHD shows satisfactory results in the long term. Endocardial systems show significantly better results than Epi systems. A younger age when implanted is a risk factor for complications at follow-up.
Permanent Epicardial Pacing in Pediatric Patients
Circulation, 2001
Background-The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of all pediatric epicardial pacing leads. Methods and Results-All epicardial leads and 1239 outpatient visits between January 1, 1983, and June 30, 2000, were retrospectively reviewed. Pacing and sensing thresholds were reviewed at implant, at 1 month, and at subsequent 6-month intervals. Lead failure was defined as the need for replacement or abandonment due to pacing or sensing problems, lead fracture, or phrenic/muscle stimulation. A total of 123 patients underwent 207 epicardial lead (60 atrial/147 ventricular, 40% steroid) implantations (median age at implant was 4.1 years [range 1 day to 21 years]). Congenital heart disease was present in 103 (84%) of the patients. Epicardial leads were followed for 29 months (range 1 to 207 months). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year lead survival was 96%, 90%, and 74%, respectively. Compared with conventional epicardial leads, both atrial and ventricular steroid leads had better stimulation thresholds 1 month after implantation; however, only ventricular steroid leads had improved chronic pacing thresholds
Technical Aspects of Pacing in Adult and Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2008
As intuitive as it might appear, it must be remembered that children are not little adults and congenital heart defects do not equate to normal cardiac anatomy. In addition, repaired congenital heart defects in adults (ACHD) might also not equate to normal anatomy. In each of these clinical situations, pacemaker device therapy may dramatically differ from most of the published information available in the field of internal medicine cardiology. Since there are now more patients with structural congenital heart defects over than under the age of 21 years, all present and future generations of pacemaker implanters need to recognize the plethora of anatomical and structural nuances potentially associated with the implantation of device therapy in this continually expanding patient population. Fortunately, advances in pacemaker and lead technology over the past 20 years, which now permit precise implantation at selective endocardial sites other than the right ventricular apex or atrial appendage and improved epicardial leads, have greatly facilitated optimization of pacing therapy. Whereas past interests have focused on lead performance issues such as dislodgement, fractures, and exit block, improvements in lead design technologies now permit more interest in maintaining or improving paced myocardial function by optimizing lead placement at alternate or more select sites. This article reviews recent applications and future directions of these pacing technologies and emphasizes differences among patients with congenital heart defects. (PACE 2008; 31:S28-S31) congenital heart disease, pediatrics, adult congenital heart, pacemaker, pacing leads, alternate site pacing, cardiac resynchronization pacing, heart block, septal pacing, His bundle pacing
Surgical Approaches to Epicardial Pacemaker Placement: Does Pocket Location Affect Lead Survival?
Pediatric Cardiology, 2010
Permanent cardiac pacing in pediatric patients presents challenges related to small patient size, complex anatomy, electrophysiologic abnormalities, and limited access to cardiac chambers. Epicardial pacing currently remains the conventional technique for infants and patients with complex congenital heart disease. Pacemaker lead failure is the major source of failure for such epicardial systems. The authors hypothesized that a retrocostal surgical approach would reduce the rate of lead failure due to fracture compared with the more traditional subrectus and subxiphoid approaches. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective chart review analyzed patients with epicardial pacemaker systems implanted or followed at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego between January 1980 and May 2007. The study cohort consisted of 219 patients and a total of 620 leads with epicardial pacemakers. Among these patients, 84% had structural congenital heart disease, and 45% were younger than 3 years at time of the first implantation. The estimated lead survival was 93% at 2 years and 83% at 5 years. The majority of leads failed due to pacing problems (54%), followed by lead fracture (31%) and sensing problems (14%). When lead failure was adjusted for length of follow-up period, no significant differences in the rates of failure by pocket location were found.
Permanent Epicardial Pacing in Pediatric Patients: 12-Year Experience at a Single Center
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2012
Permanent cardiac pacing is not often done in children, and when done is usually accomplished through epicardial pacing. We reviewed a 12-year experience with the implantation of epicardial pacemakers by our clinical group. Fifty-three patients who underwent their first implantation of an epicardial pacemaker before the age of 18 years and between 1997 and 2009 were included in our study. The mean age of the patients at the time of first pacemaker implantation was 5.7±4.8 years. Indications for pacemaker implantation included postoperative or congenital atrioventricular block and sinus node dysfunction. The patients underwent 105 operations for the replacement of pacemaker pulse generators and 75 operations for the replacement of pacemaker leads. The most commonly used generator mode was the rate-responsive accelerometer-based (DDDR) mode, which was used in 40.9% of the patients. We used more non-steroid-eluting leads (70.1%) than steroid-eluting leads (29.1%). The overall duration of follow-up in the study was 8.0±4.5 years (range, 2.1 months to approximately 17.0 years). Freedom from the need for generator replacement was 98.0%, 60.7%, and 11.1% at 1, 5, and 8 years, respectively. A tendency toward early generator exhaustion was observed among younger patients (p=0.058). The generator mode used for pacing did not significantly affect generator longevity. Freedom from the need for lead replacement was 98.3%, 83.8%, and 63.6% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The mean longevity of the leads used in the study was 10.8±0.8 years. Neither patient age at the time of lead implantation nor type of lead significantly affected lead longevity. Lead longevity was sufficiently long and did not vary significantly according to type of lead. Generator longevity was not affected by lead type, generator mode, or patient age at the time of pacemaker implantation.