MK-801 Blocks the Development of Behavioral Sensitization to Ethanol (original) (raw)

Bivalent effects of MK-801 on ethanol-induced sensitization do not parallel its effects on ethanol-induced tolerance

Behavioral Neuroscience, 2003

The relationship between the effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist MK-801 on acute responses to ethanol and its ability to block ethanol sensitization and tolerance was examined in DBA/2J mice. Cross-sensitization between these drugs was also studied. Repeated administration of 0.1 mg/kg MK-801 with ethanol potentiated, whereas 0.25 mg/kg attenuated, sensitization to ethanol's locomotor stimulant effects; rearing was similarly affected. There was evidence for cross-sensitization between ethanol and 0.25 mg/kg MK-801. MK-801 potentiated ethanol's ataxic effects in the grid test, but had no effect on tolerance to this effect. MK-801's effects on ethanol sensitization appeared to be related to its own behavioral effects, rather than NMDA receptor blockade per se. Further, these studies demonstrate dissociation between ethanol sensitization and tolerance.

Ethanol-induced sensitization depends preferentially on D1 rather than D2 dopamine receptors

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2011

Behavioral sensitization, defined as a progressive increase in the locomotor stimulant effects elicited by repeated exposure to drugs of abuse, has been used as an animal model for drug craving in humans. The mesoaccumbens dopaminergic system has been proposed to be critically involved in this phenomenon; however, few studies have been designed to systematically investigate the effects of dopaminergic antagonists on development and expression of behavioral sensitization to ethanol in Swiss mice. We first tested the effects of D 1 antagonist SCH-23390 (0-0.03 mg/kg) or D 2 antagonist Sulpiride (0-30 mg/kg) on the locomotor responses to an acute injection of ethanol (2.0 g/kg). Results showed that all tested doses of the antagonists were effective in blocking ethanol's stimulant effects. In another set of experiments, mice were pretreated intraperitoneally with SCH-23390 (0.01 mg/kg) or Sulpiride (10 mg/kg) 30 min before saline or ethanol injection, for 21 days. Locomotor activity was measured weekly for 20 min. Four days following this pretreatment, all mice were challenged with ethanol. Both antagonists attenuated the development of ethanol sensitization, but only SCH-23390 blocked the expression of ethanol sensitization according to this protocol. When we tested a single dose (30 min before tests) of either antagonist in mice treated chronically with ethanol, both antagonists attenuated ethanol-induced effects. The present findings demonstrate that the concomitant administration of ethanol with D 1 but not D 2 antagonist prevented the expression of ethanol sensitization, suggesting that the neuroadaptations underlying ethanol behavioral sensitization depend preferentially on D 1 receptor actions.

NMDA-receptor antagonists block the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol in mice

Addiction Biology, 1998

Several studies have emphasized the role of learning in the development of rapid and chronic tolerances. Recently, it was shown that the NMDA antagonists MK-801(dizocilpine) and ketamine block the development of tolerance to ethanol in rats submitted to tilt-plane apparatus. The present study examines the generality of this inhibition using mice submitted to the rota-rod test. Mice were tested in the rota-rod apparatus at 5, 10 and 15 minutes after intraperitoneal ethanol injections. The first experiment evaluated the time course of acute effects of different doses of ethanol (1.0-2.25 g/kg) in the rota-rod test. In the second experiment, the most effective dose of ethanol to produce rapid tolerance (RT) was determined. Mice were injected on day 1 with ethanol or saline and tested on the rota-rod. After 24 hours, all groups were injected with the same doses of ethanol and tested. The third experiment investigated whether ketamine (1.0-5.0 mg/kg) injected before ethanol on day 1 influenced the development of RT to ethanol. The last experiment compared the actions of the (+) and (-)MK-801 isomers (0.015-0.060 mg/kg) on RT to ethanol. Maximum motor impairment was obtained 5 minutes after ethanol injections. Pretreatment of animals with ketamine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) or with (+)MK-801 (0.030 and 0.060 mg/kg) significantly blocked the development of RT. The (-)MK-801 isomer did not affect RT, suggesting that the blockade by MK-801 is stereospecific. These results confirm and extend previous studies showing that NMDA receptor antagonists block RT to the motor impairment produced by ethanol in other animals tested in different models.

PRIOR EXPOSURE TO MK-801 SENSITIZES RATS TO ETHANOL-INDUCED CONDITIONED TASTE AVERSION

Alcohol and Alcoholism, 1998

Pretreatment with an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, dizocilpine [( + )MK-801; six daily injections of 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg, i.p.] significantly enhanced subsequent 1.5 g/kg ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). In a control experiment, dizocilpine (0.05-0.2 mg/kg) produced only a marginal CTA. Thus, pre-exposure to low, non-aversive doses of MK-801 may sensitize rats to the aversive stimulus effects of ethanol.

Effects of N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists on Reinforced and Nonreinforced Responding for Ethanol in Rats

Alcohol, 1999

BIENKOWSKI, P., E. KOROS, W. KOSTOWSKI AND W. DANYSZ. Effects of N-methyl-D -aspartate receptor antagonists on reinforced and nonreinforced responding for ethanol in rats. ALCOHOL 18 (2/3) [131][132][133][134][135][136][137] 1999.-Results of several recent studies indicate that the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are related, at least partially, to ethanol-induced decrease in the N-Methyl-D -aspartate (NMDA) receptor function. The role of NMDA receptors in ethanol reinforcement remains still unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of two novel NMDA receptor antagonists in rats lever pressing for 8% ethanol in the oral self-administration procedure. In addition, the effects of the drugs on intensity of nonreinforced responding for ethanol (i.e., "experimental craving") were examined in the extinction procedure. To assess selectivity of the drugs' actions the same range of doses was tested in rats lever pressing for water (control experiments). A low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MRZ 2/579 (2.5-7.5 mg/kg) selectively and dose-dependently decreased ethanol self-administration. This compound exerted also selective effects on nonreinforced responding for ethanol with lower dose (2.5 mg/kg) increasing and higher dose (5 mg/kg) suppressing operant behavior in the extinction procedure. MRZ 2/579 (5 mg/kg) did not alter open field activity when given in combination with either saline or ethanol (0.5-1 g/kg). In contrast, a glycine B site antagonist, MRZ 2/576 (2.5-7.5 mg/kg) did not produce any selective effects on either reinforced or nonreinforced lever pressing for ethanol. The present results suggest that MRZ 2/579 may selectively suppress both ethanol self-administration and experimental ethanol craving. © 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Nucleus accumbens dopamine D1 receptors regulate the expression of ethanol-induced behavioural sensitization

The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2010

Repeated ethanol administration may induce behavioural sensitization, defined as a progressive potentiation of locomotor stimulant effects. This process is associated with neuroadaptations in the mesolimbic pathway and the nucleus accumbens. The aim of the present study was to analyse dopamine D 1 receptor (D 1 R) participation in locomotor response to an agonist and an antagonist of the D 1 R in mice with different levels of sensitization to ethanol. In three separate experiments, mice received administrations of 2.2 g/kg ethanol or saline every other day for 10 d. According to their locomotor response on the last day, ethanol-treated animals were classified into two groups : sensitized or non-sensitized. After the treatment, mice were challenged with 4 or 8 mg/kg SKF-38393 (i.p.), a D 1 R agonist (expt 1) ; or with 0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg SCH-23390 (i.p.), a D 1 R antagonist, followed by 2.2 g/kg ethanol (i.p.) administration (expt 2). In expt 3, mice were challenged with intra-accumbens (intra-NAc) SKF-38393 (1 mg/side, in 0.2 ml), and with intra-NAc SCH-23390 (3 mg/side, in 0.2 ml) followed by 2.2 g/kg ethanol (i.p.). Although the i.p. administration of SKF-38393 did not affect the locomotion of mice, the intra-NAc administration of SKF-38393 significantly increased the locomotor activity in sensitized mice, suggesting that sensitized mice present functionally hyperresponsive D 1 Rs in the NAc. Both i.p. and intra-NAc administration of SCH-23390 blocked the expression of ethanol sensitization, suggesting that the activation of NAc D 1 Rs seems to be essential for the expression of ethanol sensitization.

Blockade of chronic tolerance to ethanol by the NMDA antagonist, (+)-MK-801

European Journal of Pharmacology, 1993

Previous studies indicated that learning and memory play important roles in the development of tolerance to ethanol. (+)-MK-801 has been shown to impair learning and might thus also block the development of tolerance to ethanol. To test this possibility, rats were trained to criterion on the moving belt, a complex motor coordination test. Acute i.p. injection of (+)-MK-801 (a non-competitive NMDA channel blocker) produced dose-related impairment on this test. A dose of 0.1 mg/kg, that had negligible effect by itself, potentiated the acute effects of ethanol. In a chronic experiment with different animals, half of the rats received (+)-MK-801 or saline daily, followed 30 min later by ethanol (1.8 g/kg i.p.) and three practice runs on the belt, and 1 h later a second dose of (+)-MK-801 or saline. The other half received the same drugs but ethanol followed the practice. ( +)-MK-801 blocked the functional tolerance to ethanol in both groups when the pre-ethanol dose was 0.25 mg/kg, but not when it was 0.1 mg/kg. Tolerance to the effects of (+)-MK-801 itself did not occur over 2 weeks of treatment. These results suggest that NMDA receptors are involved in development of chronic tolerance to ethanol as shown previously with rapid tolerance.

The Role of Opioid Receptor Subtypes in the Development of Behavioral Sensitization to Ethanol

Neuropsychopharmacology, 2006

Nonspecific blockade of opioid receptors has been found to prevent development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol. Whether this effect is achieved through a specific opioid receptor subtype, however, is not clear. The present study investigated, for the first time, the role of specific opioid receptor subtypes in the development of ethanol-(2.5 g/kg/day; six sessions) induced locomotor sensitization in mice. We confirmed previous results showing that the nonspecific antagonism of opioid receptors (naltrexone; 0-2 mg/kg) prevented the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol, an effect attained at doses presumed to occupy only mu opioid receptors. This was confirmed by using the selective mu opioid receptor antagonist CTOP (0-1.5 mg/kg), which also blocked sensitization to ethanol. The selective delta receptor antagonist, naltrindole (0-10 mg/kg), however, did not alter sensitization. We further assessed the role of mu opioid receptors in sensitization to ethanol by exploring the involvement of mu 1 , mu 1 + 2 , and mu 3 opioid receptor subtypes. Results of these experiments revealed that the blockade of mu 1 (naloxonazine; 0-30 mg/kg) or mu 3 opioid receptors (3-methoxynaltrexone; 0-6 mg/kg) did not prevent locomotor sensitization to ethanol. Using naloxonazine under treatment conditions that block mu 1 + 2 opioid receptor subtypes we observed a retarded sensitization. The present data suggest that the concurrent inactivation of all mu opioid receptor subtypes may be required to prevent the neural adaptations underlying the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol. In addition, these results support previous data suggesting a putative role for the mu opioid receptor endogenous ligand, b-endorphin, and the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in ethanol sensitization.

The role of MK-801 in sensitization to stimulants

Brain Research Reviews, 2001

Behavioral responses to stimulants can be progressively and persistently enhanced by their repeated administration. This phenomenon, called behavioral sensitization, may underlie substance abuse, psychosis, recurrence in bipolar disorder, or other psychiatric problems. A growing body of work has implicated excitatory amino acid systems in behavioral sensitization. Most of the evidence for a role of excitatory amino acids has come from experiments demonstrating prevention of sensitization by excitatory amino acid antagonists, especially the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. Results of studies with MK-801 have varied, however, leading to conflicting interpretations of its relationship to behavioral sensitization. This paper critically discusses the design of experiments that have used MK-801, and interprets data from these experiments in terms of the two leading explanations for the role of MK-801: 1) that sensitization is an example of the family of plastic events that require excitatory amino acid transmission or 2) that interoceptive cues associated with MK-801 lead to state-dependent learning that modifies sensitization because, in essence, the animal does not recognize the stimulant as the same drug if it is given in close association with MK-801. Based on conflicting reports on effects of MK-801, we propose 1) strategies for distinguishing components of MK-801's effects on responses to stimulants, 2) a model that is a hybrid of the two interpretations of its effects on sensitization, and 3) experimental strategies for testing this model.