Effects of Acute Nicotine on Several Operant Behaviors in Rats (original) (raw)
Related papers
The effects of nicotine on cognition are dependent on baseline performance
European Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014
Since cholinergic neurotransmission plays a major role in cognition, stimulation of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor may be a target for cognitive enhancement. While nicotine improves performance on several cognitive domains, results of individual studies vary. A possible explanation for these findings is that the effect of nicotine administration may be dependent on baseline cognitive function, where subjects with a suboptimal cognitive performance may benefit from nicotine, while subjects who already perform optimally may show a decline in performance after nicotinic stimulation. We conducted a double-blind randomised placebocontrolled crossover trial, examining the effects of placebo, 1, and 2 mg of nicotine on cognition in young (n =16, age 18-30 years) and healthy elderly (n =16, age 60-75 years) subjects. We hypothesised that the elderly would benefit more from nicotine compared to young subjects, as normal ageing is associated with decreases in cognitive function. Attention, working memory, visual memory, information-processing speed, psychomotor function, stereotypy, and emotion recognition were assessed. Compared to the young volunteers, the elderly performed significantly worse on psychomotor function and emotion recognition in the placebo condition. Nicotine had no effect in the young volunteers and decreased performance on www.elsevier.com/locate/euroneuro http://dx.(P. Niemegeers).
Neurochemical mechanisms mediating the behavioral and cognitive effects of nicotine
Drug Development Research, 1994
Data are reviewed, largely from experiments in the authors'laboratory, that suggest three modes of action of systemic nicotine in producing three different types of effect upon behavior and cognitive function. (1) Preexposure of a stimulus without consequence makes it harder subsequently to form associations to that stimulus, a form of selective attention known as latent inhibition. Latent inhibition is blocked by nicotine, an effect that is apparently mediated by a nicotine‐induced increase in dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. (2) A single dose of nicotine proactively increases the partial reinforcement extinction effect measured several weeks later: that is, resistance to extinction is decreased by nicotine in animals that have been trained on a continuous reinforcement schedule, and increased in animals trained on a partial reinforcement schedule. This effect appears to be due to increased synthesis of tyrosine hydroxylase in the cell bodies of noradrenergic neurons ...
The Effects of Nicotine on Learning and Memory
Physiology & Behavior, 1999
The effects ofnicofine in learning nntl nwnwry: A new ro/'.~~~ho/ogit,rrl rr.wr.wment in vorwrg nml .s~n~ww~/ Fixher 344 rats. PHYSIOL BEHAV 67(3) 421431. lYYY.-The effects of chronic nicotine on the bchaiioral pcrformancc of young (4 month) and old (24 month) Fischer-344 rats were assessed on four behavioral tasks: activity chamber. rotating rod, serial pattern learning. and Morris water maze paradigm. Old and young nicotine-trcatcd rats reccivcd an intraperitoneal injection of nicotine (0.20 mg/kg) 15 min prior to all behavioral testing. and old and young saline-treated rats received saline injections 15 min prior to all behavioral testing. Nicotine improved motor coordination and increased the general activity levels of the old rats compared to old saline-treated rats. There were no significant differences in the behaviors of the young rats in these behavioral evaluations. In young rats. nicotine improved the acquisition of a serial pattern. suggesting an improvement in working memory or related processes. Nicotine was found to increase swim speed in a Morris water maze paradigm with a hidden platform; however. no beneficial effects of nicotine in rcfcrence memory were obtained for either age group. These results suggests that nicotine may not be as beneficial in attenuating age-related learning and memory deficits as once proposed. 0 1YYY Elsevier Science Inc.
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2007
Nicotine appears to enhance attention, while nicotine withdrawal leads to attentional deficits in humans that are ameliorated with nicotine administration. However, there has been much debate as to whether nicotine improves performance under baseline conditions, or only ameliorates attentional deficits. Thus, we studied the effects of acute and chronic nicotine administration and nicotine withdrawal on attentional performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) in Wistar and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats under baseline conditions. Wistar rats performed with higher accuracy compared to SD rats. Acute nicotine administration induced small increases in accuracy and correct responses, impulsivity and speed of responding and decreases in omission errors. These effects were more pronounced in less accurate rats or after task modifications were implemented to disrupt the rats' performance. Chronic nicotine administration via minipumps consistently increased accuracy during days 4-6 of nicotine infusion after the effect of nicotine on impulsivity during days 1-3 dissipated. By contrast, nicotine withdrawal induced decreases in correct responses, and increases in omissions and latencies to respond, but had no effect on accuracy. These results provide evidence that chronic, but not acute, nicotine administration induced accuracy improvement under baseline conditions, while nicotine withdrawal produced some limited performance deficits.
Psychopharmacology, 1996
(-)-Nicotine tartrate (2 mg/kg), and a nicotinic agonist, RJR 2403 (1.4 mg/kg), and antagonist, mecamylamine (1 mg/kg), were administered to separate groups of rats SC twice daily for 10 days. Two other groups received the same doses of nicotine or R JR 2403 for 1 day followed by saline for 9 days. Twenty-four hours after the final injection, the rats were compared to a 10-day saline-injected group on acquisition of a hidden platform position in the Morris water maze (20 trials, 30-min inter-trial interval). The rats were killed 48 h after the last drug injection and frontal, entorhinal and posterior cingulate cortex and dorsal and ventral hippocampus assayed for [3H]-nicotine binding density. Chronic nicotine significantly increased the number of frontal and entorhinal cortical and dorsal hippocampal, but not posterior cingulate cortical or ventral hippocampal, nicotinic receptors, and improved rate of learning. Chronic mecamylamine and R JR 2403 also significantly increased the number of nicotinic receptors in frontal cortex, though not other regions, but retarded rate of learning. Nicotine given for 1 day 11 days earlier marginally increased nicotinic receptors in entorhinal cortex (but not other regions) and significantly increased rate of learning, though significantly less than 10-day nicotine. Entorhinal cortical and
Acute administration of nicotine does not enhance cognitive functions
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 2019
Chronic smokers often claim that smoking improves their cognitive abilities, such as concentration. However, scientific evidence to support this claim is scarce. Previous studies gave inconclusive results, and some of them had significant methodological flaws. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test whether smoking a single cigarette affects performance across several cognitive domains. It included a group of 22 occasional smokers aged 19–29 years. Attention, working memory, and visuospatial reasoning were assessed using a within-subjects design with a control setting. There were two separate testing sessions two days apart. Half the group started with experimental and the other half with control setting. In the experimental setting, the participants completed the first block of tasks, smoked one cigarette (with a nicotine yield of 0.5 mg), and then completed the second block of tasks. In the control setting, the procedure was the same, except that the participants had a glass ...
Limits of learning enhancements with nicotine in old male rats
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars), 2005
Findings with young adult humans and animal models suggest that nicotine may serve both neuroprotective and cognition enhancing roles in old animals. A pair of experiments was conducted to examine drug-induced modification of the cholinergic nicotinic receptor subtype on rates of learning by young and aged rats. In experiment I males (47 months or 2025 months old) were administered nicotine (0.0, 0.3 or 0.7 mg/kg injected s.c. daily) and tested in both a T-maze non-spatial discrimination paradigm and a hole board spatial task. Nicotine failed to improve acquisition by young animals on either task. Nicotine also failed to improve non-spatial learning by old animals. However, both dosages of nicotine improved performance by the old males in the spatial paradigm. In experiment II, a 5-choice serial discrimination paradigm designed to better evaluate visual attention and spatial working memory in aging was used. Groups of old male rats were administered nicotine or mecamylamine (2 or 8 mg/kg), an antagonist of the nicotinic cholinergic receptor. Results were that the 0.3 mg nicotine group learned the task fastest and achieved the highest learning asymptote. Both learning rates and final levels of performance were worst in the 8 mg mecamylamine group. However, the 2 mg mecamylamine rats were the equals of the control group and both reached a higher asymptote than the 0.7 mg nicotine group. These data suggest that healthy old animals can accrue benefits from nicotinic activation but that the benefits are complex, being limited to certain dosages and to specific cognitive skills.
Positive effects of nicotine on cognition: the deployment of attention for prospective memory.
Rationale Human and animal studies over the last two decades report that nicotine can improve cognitive performance. Prospective memory (PM), the retrieval and implementation of a previously encoded intention, is also improved by pre-administration of nicotine. As with other nicotine effects, however, predicting precisely how and when nicotine improves the processes engaged by PM has proved less straightforward. Objective We present two studies that explore the source of nicotine’s enhancement of PM. Experiment 1 tests for effects of nicotine on preparatory attention (PA) for PM target detection. Experiment 2 asks whether nicotine enhances processing of the perceptual attributes of the PM targets. Materials and methods Young adult non-smokers matched on baseline performance measures received either 1 mg nicotine or matched placebo via nasal spray. Volunteers completed novel PM tasks at 15 min post-administration. Results Experiment 1 confirmed that pre-administration of nicotine to non-smokers improved detection rate for prospective memory targets presented during an attention-demanding ongoing task. There was no relationship between PM performance and measures of preparatory attention. In experiment 2, salient targets were more likely to be detected than non-salient targets, but nicotine did not confer any additional advantage to salient targets. Conclusion The present study suggests that nicotinic stimulation does not work to enhance perceptual salience of target stimuli (experiment 2), nor does it work through better deployment of preparatory working attention (experiment 1). An alternative explanation that nicotine promotes PM detection by facilitating disengagement from the ongoing task is suggested as a future line of investigation.
Effects of nicotinic stimulation on cognitive performance
Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 2004
Recent advances in studies of nicotinic agents in humans have begun to more carefully define cognitive operations that can be influenced by nicotinic stimulation and/or blockade. Careful separation of the cognitive domains affected by nicotinic stimulation has identified attentional performance as the most likely candidate to be positively influenced by nicotinic receptor activation. Studies of the effects of nicotinic systems and/or nicotinic receptor stimulation in pathological disease states such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and schizophrenia show the potential for therapeutic utility of nicotinic drugs. In contrast to studies in pathological states, studies of nicotine in normal-non-smokers tend to show deleterious effects. This contradiction can be resolved by consideration of cognitive and biological baseline dependency differences between study populations in terms of the relationship of optimal cognitive performance to nicotinic receptor activity. Although normal individuals are unlikely to show cognitive benefits after nicotinic stimulation except under extreme task conditions, individuals with a variety of disease states can benefit from nicotinic drugs. Attentional function/ dysfunction may serve as an endophenotypic therapeutic target for nicotinic drug development.
A low dose of subcutaneous nicotine improves information processing in non-smokers
1994
Many studies have found that cigarette smoking or nicotine improves mental functioning in abstinent smokers. An unresolved issue is whether this improvement is due primarily to a direct facilitation of performance or to relief of the impairment caused by nicotine withdrawal. We evaluated the performance of 12 nonsmokers before and twice (15 and 45 min) after a subcutaneous injection of 0.8 mg nicotine, 0.8 ml saline, and a control no treatment, on a choice reaction time (RT) task. Each treatment was given on a separate day; the control day was given on the first session. The order of nicotine and saline was balanced between subjects, and injections were given double-blind. The RT task manipulated stimulus and response processing. These manipulations consisted of two levels of stimulus complexity and two levels of response complexity, resulting in four task conditions. These manipulations along with latency measures of the event-related potential were used to identify the components of processing that mediated nicotine's effects on performance. During each active drug session blood nicotine levels, cardiovascular, and subjective responses were measured before and after each of the three tests (we-drug, 15 min and 45 min post-drug). For the information processing measures only the comparisons of the pre-and 15-min post-test showed significant drug effects. Nicotine compared to saline significantly increased the number of responses at the fast end of the RT distribution. However, there were no changes in accuracy. Nicotine also speeded mean RT compared with saline or the control day, but the effects were only significant for the control-nicotine comparison. There was an interaction between effects of nicotine and the task variables, such that nicotine speeded P3 latency in the hardest task condition, while slowing it in the other task conditions. Nicotine significantly increased heart rate, which lasted for the entire session. Blood nicotine levels were lower than expected from a preliminary study in smokers and may Correspondence to: Jacques Le Houezec have been responsible for the smaller than expected mean RT effects. These findings suggest that even a low dose of nicotine directly affects attention or stimulus processing components of information processing. This study also illustrates the importance of assessing both multiple components of information processing and nicotine levels when examining the effects of nicotine on cognition.