Testing Austrian Business Cycle Theory? A Rejoinder to Andrew T. Young (original) (raw)

The Austrian Business Cycle Theory: Validity and Implications

2009

The chapter ends with some thoughts on the third question regarding the validity of the theory. Empirically, the present investigation is inadequate to make any bold conclusions, but the data does at least not falsify the theory. Further econometric investigations are necessary in order to answer this more definitely. The logic of the theory seems to some extent promising, and the Austrians are able to provide fairly good answers in response to most of the criticism. However, there are certain problems. The capital theory may be regarded as inadequate, the Keynesian critique of the market for loanable funds is problematic for the Austrian theory, and one may generally be skeptic towards the possibility of deriving true propositions through long chains of logical deductions.

Austrian business cycle theory: Empirical evidence

The Review of Austrian Economics, 2009

The Austrian approach to business cycles has been seldom examined in econometric terms. This paper first reviews the essentials of that approach and the recent application of the Austrian business cycle theory in the economics literature. Quarterly data for Germany, USA, England and France, 1980:1 through 2006:1, are used to explore business cycle facts and relations between terms structure of interest rates, relative prices, composition of aggregate expenditure and real GDP. Results are consistent with the hypothesis of the Austrian business cycle theory that monetary policy shocks explain cycles. The changes in term structure of interest rates and composition of aggregate expenditure are large enough to explain changes in aggregate economic activity.

Is the Austrian business cycle theory still relevant?

The Review of Austrian Economics, 2008

We compile econometric evidence from the latest available time series data on US savings, consumption, interest rates, and gross domestic product (GDP) to test a reduced form model of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT). We build indexes that mimic the gap between the market and natural rates of interest and, using this gap as a proxy for expansionary policy,

An Empirical Illustration of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory: The case of the United States, 1988-2010

investigación económica, 2013

The 2007-2008 financial crisis and subsequent global economic recession have sparked re- newed interest in the Austrian business cycle theory. Although for methodological reasons we have found few econometric studies that analyze this theory, in recent years several works have been published to illustrate very relevant aspects of it. The main objective of this article, after reviewing econometric literature on the Austrian cycle, is therefore to analyze the per- formance of the U.S. economy between 1988 and 2010 in light of the contributions of the endogenous monetary cycle theory.

The Austrian Business Cycle Theory: A Defense of Its General Validity

Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2015

The paper aims to defend the general validity of the ABCT against the assumption that the theory does not hold if entrepreneurs are able to anticipate correctly the inflationary effects of a fiduciary credit expansion. Hülsmann (1998) raises this critique and puts forward a general theory of error cycles centered on government intervention in the economy in order to overcome the perceived shortcomings of the traditional ABCT. The paper analyzes the main implications of this critique of the ABCT in terms of entrepreneurial foresight and the optimal course of action necessary to prevent a monetary induced business cycle, in particular in the context of fractional reserve banks operating under fiat currency. It concludes that within the general framework of human action, entrepreneurs cannot arbitrage away clusters of errors, and the ABCT remains valid. This paper also questions whether Hülsmann’s essentialist approach can be a viable alternative to the traditional ABCT, and find that,...

Tyler Cowen on Austrian Business Cycle Theory: A Critique

Cowen (1997) criticizes Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) on eight grounds: 1. systematic errors; 2. inflation volatility; 3. confusion of inflation and savings; 4. confusion of inflation and investment; 5. real vs. nominal rates of interest; 6. interest rate information; 7. investor interpretation of interest rates; 8. validation of inflationary investments. The present paper rejects all of these claims, and defends ABCT against them.

On Hummel on Austrian Business Cycle Theory

Jeffrey Rogers Hummel criticizes Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT), and it is our intent in the present article to reply to his criticisms, defending this viewpoint against the difficulties he raises with it.

Business Cycle Theory and Econometrics

The Economic Journal, 1995

We outline in turn criticisms made by econometricians of the methods used in empirical business-cycle research and then criticisms made by business-cycle researchers of some methods used by econometricians. The aim is to clarify and in some cases correct these criticisms. Overall there is no conflict in using rigourous statistical procedures to study modern dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. We also provide a concise bibliography of recent research on statistical methods for business-cycle models.

Austrian business cycle theory : agent-based-model illustration and empirical application

2018

Cette recherche vise a reformuler la theorie autrichienne du cycle economique. L’idee centrale est que les banques centrales peuvent faciliter la creation des credits qui ne sont pas bases sur les epargnes des consommateurs et que cela peut permettre aux banques et les inciter de finances certains projets de la longue duree qui elles n’ont pas trouves attirants a financer dans le passe. Ces projets peuvent derouter certaines ressources de la production de certains biens de consommation meme si les preferences des consommateurs pertinents n’ont pas change. Ces derniers peuvent renverser la mauvaise allocation des ressources ou obliger les initiateurs des projets respectifs de payer plus pour les ressources pertinentes. Cela va soit amener a l’echec des projets mentionnes ou obliger les initiateurs de reduire leurs depenses sur d’autres activites, ainsi que declencher d’autres effets negatifs pour l’economie. En plus, la recherche illustre la logique centrale de la theorie a travers u...