Safety and efficacy of incobotulinum toxin type A (NT 201-Xeomin) for the treatment of post-stroke lower limb spasticity: a prospective open-label study (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2011
To investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated treatment with incobotulinum toxin A (botulinum neurotoxin type A free from complexing proteins; NT 201) in poststroke upper limb spasticity. Patients and design: After completing a double-blind, placebocontrolled, multicentre study (up to 20 weeks), 145 patients received up to 5 additional sets of NT 201 injections for an open-label extension period of up to 69 weeks. Methods: Upper limb muscle groups were treated as clinically indicated; injection intervals were ≥ 12 weeks. Outcome was assessed 4 weeks after each injection session and at the end of the study. Results: Muscle tone (flexors of wrist, elbow, finger, and thumb, and forearm pronators) improved throughout the study (response rate: up to 80.6%, p < 0.0001, Ashworth Scale). Continuous and significant improvements were also observed in disability (p < 0.05, Disability Assessment Scale). The majority of investigators, patients and caregivers rated NT 201 efficacy as very good or good (56-84%). Adverse events considered treatment-related occurred in 11% of patients. Formation of neutralizing antibodies was not observed in any patient after repeated treatments. Conclusion: Treatment with NT 201 showed sustained improvements in muscle tone and functionality (median dose 400 units) over a study duration of up to 89 weeks, and was well tolerated during repeated treatments for post-stroke upper limb spasticity.
Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity after Stroke
Drugs
Post-stroke lower limb spasticity impairs balance and gait leading to reduced walking speed, often increasing wheelchair use and caregiver burden. Several studies have shown that appropriate treatments for lower limb spasticity after stroke include injections of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), phenol or alcohol, surgical correction and a rehabilitation program. In the present article, we review the safety and effectiveness of BoNT-A for the treatment of lower limb spasticity after stroke, with a focus on higher doses of BoNT-A. The cumulative body of evidence coming from the randomized clinical trials and openlabel studies selected in the article suggest BoNT-A to be safe and efficacious in reducing lower limb spasticity after stroke. Studies of high doses of BoNT-A also showed a greater reduction of severe post-stroke spasticity. In stroke survivors with spasticity of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles, a combined approach between surgery and BoNT-A can be indicated. However, controversy remains about improvement in motor function relative to post-stroke spasticity reduction after BoNT-A treatment.
Journal of the neurological sciences, 2017
Current guidelines suggested a dosage up to 600units (U) of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) (onabotulinumtoxinA or incobotulinumtoxinA) in reducing spastic hypertonia with low prevalence of complications, although a growing body of evidence showed efficacy with the use of high doses (>800U). The available evidence mainly referred to a single set of injections evaluating the efficacy and safety of the neurotoxin 30days after the treatment. In a prospective, non-randomized, open-label study, we studied the safety of repeated higher doses of incobotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke upper and lower limb spasticity. Two years after the first set of injections, we evaluated in 20 stroke survivors with upper and lower limb spasticity the long-term safety of repeated high doses of incobotulinumtoxinA (up to 840U) for a total of eight sets of injections. Patients reported an improvement of their clinical picture concerning a reduction of spasticity measured with the Asworth Scale (AS) for elbow...
Neurological Sciences, 2005
Current antispastic medications are unsatisfactory for spasticity treatment, but botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) shows promise as a new therapeutic option. This open-label, prospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness of BTX-A in improving functional mobility in the early post-stroke population using an individualised, flexible range of doses and targeted muscle groups. Twenty-one stroke patients (13 male, 8 female) were enrolled and injected with BTX-A (Botox, Allergan, mean dose: 255 U; range: 185-300) according to individual spasticity patterns. Assessments were made at baseline and weeks 2, 4,
Journal of Neurology, 2010
Lower limb spasticity in post-stroke patients can impair ambulation and reduces activities of daily living (ADL) performance of patients. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) has been shown effective for upper limb spasticity. This study assesses the treatment of lower limb spasticity in a large placebo-controlled clinical trial. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of one-time injections of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) in Japanese patients with post-stroke lower limb spasticity. One hundred twenty patients with lower limb spasticity were randomized to a single treatment with BoNTA 300 U or placebo. The tone of the ankle flexor was assessed at baseline and through 12 weeks using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Gait pattern and speed of gait were also assessed. The primary endpoint was area under the curve (AUC) of the change from baseline in the MAS ankle score. Significant improvement in spasticity with BoNTA 300 U was demonstrated by a mean difference in the AUC of the change from baseline in the MAS ankle score between the BoNTA and placebo groups (-3.428; 95% CIs, -5.841 to -1.016; p = 0.006; t test). A significantly greater decrease from baseline in the MAS ankle score was noted at weeks 4, 6 and 8 in the BoNTA group compared to the placebo group (p \ 0.001). Significant improvement in the Clinicians Global Impression was noted by the investigator at weeks 4, 6 and 8 (p = 0.016-0.048, Wilcoxon test), but not by the patient or physical/occupational therapist. Assessments of gait pattern using the Physician's Rating Scale and speed of gait revealed no significant treatment differences but showed a tendency towards improvement with BoNTA. No marked difference was noted in the frequency of treatment-related adverse events between BoNTA and placebo groups. This was the first large-scale trial to indicate that BoNTA significantly reduced spasticity in lower limb muscles.
Background: A variety of techniques for the management of spasticity have been suggested, including positioning, cryotherapy, splinting and casting, biofeedback, electrical stimulation, and medical management by pharmacological agents, Botulinum toxin A (BTA) is now the pharmacological treatment of choice in focal spasticity. BTA by blocking acetylcholine release at neuromuscular junctions accounts for its therapeutic action to relieve spasticity. Methods: A computerized search of Pub Med was carried out to find the latest result about efficacy of BTA in management of post stroke spasticity. Result: Among 84 articles were found, frothy of them included in this review and divided to lower and upper extremity. Conclusions: BTA is a treatment choice in reducing tone and managing post stroke spasticity.
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2021
B otulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) has been in clinical use for treating post-stroke spasticity for approximately 30 years and is the accepted standard of care for focal post-stroke spasticity (1). It is currently known that BoNT-A treatment is safe and effective for use in both upper and lower limb spasticity, where it can result in both active and passive functional gains (2). Furthermore, BoNT-A is a first-line pharmacological treatment in the management of post-stoke focal and multi-focal spasticity, which, along with a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, should be part of a rehabilitation programme to promote optimal clinical effect (3-5). In addition, the Royal College of Physicians' (RCP) guidelines for management of adult spasticity using BoNT-A JRM JRM
Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology, 2013
Search of relevant studies was conducted on MEDLINE (from 1995 to July 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE (1995 to July 2012). Search terms varied slightly across databases but included: "cerebrovascular accident" or "stroke" and the terms "botulinum toxin", "spasticity" as either MeSH terms, key words, or subject headings. Only randomized studies (RT) treating patients with UL post-stroke spasticity by BTX-A injection were included. Studies of treatment for both lower and/or UL spasticity were included if the results for patients with UL spasticity were reported separately. Prospective open label, case series, cohort studies and case reports were excluded. Furthermore, because confounding results, RTs were also excluded whether: i) post-stroke spasticity was treated by different serotype neurotoxin; ii) botulinum toxin was given early after the stroke, before clinical evidence of severe spasticity was established; iii) mixed sample of subjects with spasticity secondary to stroke or other neurological disorders was enrolled; iv) spasticity followed a non-Abstract Objective: Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) use reduces upper limb (UL) spasticity in stroke patients, but the effects on functional recovery remain uncertain. The aim of present review was to ascertain if the reduction of spasticity by use of BTX-A was linked to a functional gain of UL or in activity of daily living in post-stroke patients.