Predictive Gains from Forecast Combinations Using Time Varying Model Weights (original) (raw)
Related papers
Forecast accuracy and economic gains from Bayesian model averaging using time-varying weights
Journal of Forecasting, 2010
Several Bayesian model combination schemes, including some novel approaches that simultaneously allow for parameter uncertainty, model uncertainty and robust time varying model weights, are compared in terms of forecast accuracy and economic gains using financial and macroeconomic time series. The results indicate that the proposed time varying model weight schemes outperform other combination schemes in terms of predictive and economic gains. In an empirical application using returns on the S&P 500 index, time varying model weights provide improved forecasts with substantial economic gains in an investment strategy including transaction costs. Another empirical example refers to forecasting US economic growth over the business cycle. It suggests that time varying combination schemes may be very useful in business cycle analysis and forecasting, as these may provide an early indicator for recessions.
2006
Similar to other Central Banks, the BCRA publishes monthly a REM that summaries the forecasts and projections of a group of economic analysts and consultants who volunteer to participate in the program. The BCRA publishes only the median, and the standard deviation of the sample received. The logic for using these statistics is that all participants are to be treated equally. Under the assumption that some forecasters have better underlying models than others, one might be able to improve the accuracy of the aggregate forecast by giving greater priority to those who have historically predicted better. The BCRA does not have access to the models used to make the predictions, only the forecasts are provided. An averaging method that puts higher weights on the predictions of those forecasters who have done best in the past should be able to produce a better aggregate forecast. The problem is how to determine these weights. In this paper, we develop a Bayesian averaging method that can ...
Forecast Combination with Multiple Models and Expert Correlations
2019
Program in Systems Modeling and Analysis Combining multiple forecasts in order to generate a single, more accurate one is a well-known approach. A simple average of forecasts has been found to be robust despite theoretically better approaches, increasing availability in the number of expert forecasts, and improved computational capabilities. The dominance of a simple average is related to the small sample sizes and to the estimation errors associated with more complex methods. We study the role that expert correlation, multiple experts, and their relative forecasting accuracy have on the weight estimation error distribution. The distributions we find are used to identify the conditions when a decision maker can confidently estimate weights versus using a simple average. We also propose an improved expert weighting approach that is less sensitive to covariance estimation error while providing much of the benefit from a covariance optimal weight. These two improvements create a new heuristic for better forecast aggregation that is simple to use. This heuristic appears new to the literature and is shown to perform better than a simple average in a simulation study and by application to xiv economic forecast data.
Bayesian Model Averaging and Forecasting
2011
This paper focuses on the problem of variable selection in linear regression models. I briefly review the method of Bayesian model averaging, which has become an important tool in empirical settings with large numbers of potential regressors and relatively limited numbers of observations. Some of the literature is discussed with particular emphasis on forecasting in economics. The role of the prior assumptions in these procedures is highlighted, and some recommendations for applied users are given.
Forecast Density Combinations of Dynamic Models and Data Driven Portfolio Strategies
SSRN Electronic Journal
A dynamic asset-allocation model is specified in probabilistic terms as a combination of return distributions resulting from multiple pairs of dynamic models and portfolio strategies based on momentum patterns in US industry returns. The nonlinear state space representation of the model allows efficient and robust simulation-based Bayesian inference using a novel non-linear filter. Combination weights can be crosscorrelated and correlated over time using feedback mechanisms. Diagnostic analysis gives insight into model and strategy misspecification. Empirical results show that a smaller flexible model-strategy combination performs better in terms of expected return and risk than a larger basic model-strategy combination. Dynamic patterns in combination weights and diagnostic learning provide useful signals for improved modelling and policy, in particular, from a risk-management perspective. * We thank two anonymous referees and the guest-editors, Sylvia Kaufman and Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter, for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper which led us to prepare an extended and substantially revised version of Baştürk, Grassi, Hoogerheide and Van Dijk (2016b).
Stock Return Predictability by Bayesian Model Averaging: Evidence from Stock Exchange of Thailand
International Journal of Economic Sciences, 2014
This research paper examines the predictability power on future stock returns by employing the concept of Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). The sample focuses on Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) over 2001-2011. Predictors for return predictability contain financial information which are dividend yield, Book-to-Market, Earning yield, Default risk premium, Monthly rate of three-month Treasury bill, Term premium, Monthly inflation rate and Term spread. This paper also explores the predictability power over financial crisis, sub-period over 2008-2009. In addition, this paper compares expected returns from two models between BMA and traditional regression (Fama and Macbeth two steps procedure). Results indicated that BMA approach outperforms the traditional regression model.