Dreaming of Seamless Borders: ICTs and the Pre-Emptive Governance of Mobility in Europe (original) (raw)
Related papers
‘Greedy’ Information Technology: The Digitalization of the European Migration Policy
European borders are being transformed into digital borders. The ambition behind the European information systems – like the Schengen Information System and Eurodac – is to establish a single Union information system to control the flux of migrants. We show that in this process information technology is not a neutral tool to reach established goals but that it is ‘greedy’. This greediness indicates the distorting potential of information technology regarding the means-end logic. Our analysis suggests that the European migration policy is stuck in a ‘digital fix’, i.e. a technological fix focusing on ICT. We identify three political issues concerning greedy information technology within the context of the European migration policy. The first issue concerns the democratic control on information systems. The second issue discusses the weak legal position of immigrants. The third issue inquires into the effectiveness of information systems as a policy instrument
Border security and the digitalisation of sovereignty: insights from EU borderwork
European Security, 2022
The European Union’s effort at controlling its external borders is an endeavour that increasingly relies on digital systems: from tools for information gathering and surveillance to systems for communicating between different agencies and across member states. This makes EU borders a key site for the politics of “digital sovereignty” – of controlling digital data, software and infrastructures. In this article, we propose a new understanding of how the concepts of digital and sovereignty interplay: sovereignty by digital means, sovereignty of the digital, and sovereignty over the digital. We do it by analysing three key manifestations within the EU’s borderwork: firstly, the expansion of EURODAC to include facial biometric data; secondly, the creation of the (future) shared Biometric Matching System (sBMS); and thirdly, the EU-funded West Africa Police Information System (WAPIS). These databases and systems exemplify three transformations of EU borderwork that invoke different dimensions of digital sovereignty: expansion of techniques for governing migration; interoperability of EU databases facilitating the internalisation of borders through domestic policing; and extra-territorialization of borderwork beyond the geographic limits of the EU.
Security Dialogue, 2016
Migration controls at the external EU borders have become a large field of political and financial investment in recent years – indeed, an 'industry' of sorts – yet conflicts between states and border agencies still mar attempts at cooperation. This article takes a close look at one way in which officials try to overcome such conflicts: through technology. In West Africa, the secure 'Seahorse' network hardwires border cooperation into a satellite system connecting African and European forces. In Spain's North African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla, advanced border fencing has joined up actors around a supposedly impenetrable divide. And on the EU level, the 'European external border surveillance system', or Eurosur, papers over power struggles between agencies and states through 'decentralized' information-sharing – even as the system’s physical features (nodes, coordination centres, interfaces) deepen competition between them. The article shows how such technologies, rather than 'halting migration', have above all acted as catalysts for new social relations among disparate sectors, creating areas for collaboration and competition, compliance and conflict. With these dynamics in mind, the conclusion sketches an 'ecological' perspective on the materialities of border control – infrastructure, interfaces, vehicles – while calling for more research on their contradictory and often counterproductive consequences.
Border surveillance, mobility management and the shaping of non-publics in Europe
Social sorting of migrants and travellers based on data stored in information systems is at the centre of border controls and mobility management in Europe. Recent literature finds that the inclusion-exclusion distinction is insufficiently equipped to do justice to the variety of classifications that is applied. Instead, a proliferation of refined categorisations determines the outcome of visa and permit applications. This article explores the 'administrative ecology' in between the two extremes of inclusion and exclusion. It claims information technologies encourage the emergence of an intermediary category of 'non-publics' situated between the level of groups and the level of individuals. The ontological and normative status of these 'non-publics' will be analysed by using some key notions of Actor-Network Theory.
Smart Borders Package: a new Security Apparatus for the Government of Mobility in the EU
Information and communication technologies (ICTs), particularly the adoption of large-scale databases play a crucial role in border management and mobility governance. On April 6, 2016, the European Commission launched a second edited version of the ‘Smart Border Package’ which did not secure consensus in 2013. The Package is designed to overcome one of the major paradoxes of our age: the necessity to leave borders open for commerce, tourism and education, while at the same time keeping them close to criminals, terrorists, and illegal migrants. By drawing from governmentality and Foucauldian “politics of scientific statement”, this thesis examines the Smart Borders Package as an attempt to (re)construct the security apparatus responsible for the government of human mobility travelling in and out of the Schengen Area. By submitting the empirical materials to critical discourse analysis, this thesis, first of all, argues that borders have become networked, virtualised, and diffused institutions for policing over the clandestine side of globalisation. Accordingly, mobility is made ‘visible’ and ‘legible’ through the informatization of the body, and simultaneously amenable to intervention by means of ‘the generalised biopolitical border’. Secondly, knowledge in the form of statistics is employed to make uncertainties regarding mobility observable and actionable, whilst risk management opens up spaces for government interventions, ultimately resting on a logic proper of the intelligence field. Thirdly, a new relationship between science and knowledge emerges, culminating in the adoption of a pre-emptive approach to security in the form of dataveillance. However, challenges to the security apparatus occur when law enforcement and border authorities are urged to take actions in conditions of epistemic uncertainty, which might culminate in practices of statistical discrimination and epistemic injustices. It is suggested that the gathering and processing of information about mobility could result to be both, an asset and entailing possibilities for governmental abuses on innocent third-country nationals. Therefore, greater caution is recommended in applying pre-emptive security strategies in situations where there is a lack of substantial evidence and decisions stem from data-driven knowledge and reasoned imagination.
The Politics of Digital Borders
Border Politics
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and large-scale digital databases play a crucial role in the European management of borders and mobility governance. Since the 1990 Schengen Agreement three large-scale IT systems and a number of information sharing mechanisms have emerged. This chapter scrutinizes the relationship between digital technology and border politics by following the idiom of co-production, which focuses on the interconnectedness between techno-political developments and the (re-)construction of social orders. It examines how digital systems are deployed and enacted in the processes of identification, data collection and categorization. The analysis is based on various documents issued by the main official authorities and actors, from official communications and regulation by the European Commission and Council to the information brochures and technical reports of the eu-Lisa agency. The chapter will first present the main developments of ICTs and digital systems in European border management, and then point to the ways in which digital technologies are deployed for the governance of cross-border mobility. In particular, it highlights the de-territorialization effects of digital border governance and the important role of the human body in identification and categorization processes. Finally, it argues that digital borders are co-produced by the interaction and interplay of human actors and technological systems at the various border sites.
Intelligent Borders? Securitizing Smartphones in the European Border Regime
Culture Machine, 2021
Rather than taking for granted the emergence and implementation of data-driven automated technologies as smooth tools of migration governance, I analyze how the discursive and political narration of intelligent borders is central for the socio-technical renderings of data-driven border and migration policing. To this end, I analyze the implementation of data-driven and semi-automated technologies to authenticate and recognize asylum seekers' identities and claims in the context of asylum administration and migration control in Germany, with a particular focus on the practice of forensic smartphone data extraction. First, I argue that discourses of intelligent borders produce smartphone data as representative of a person's history of flight and persecution, affecting a shift in asylum proceedings and decision-making that impacts political and legal personhood. Second, I show that current discursive framings of migration as a crisis in Europe make possible the proliferation of machine learning technologies in which invocations of intelligent borders reify migration management as a system of governance and administration that functions seamlessly. Third, I argue that local instances when data-driven and computational technologies emerge allow us to interrogate moments of failure and contestation and reveal the longer development of the legal and political convergence of racial securitization and migration as constitutive of the (partial) consolidation of power in the European border regime. As such, media technologies like the smartphone function to mediate contestations and struggles over the freedom of movement, recognition, and belonging.