Are Muslims the only perpetrators of violence? (original) (raw)
Related papers
In the contemporary period, Islam is frequently depicted as predisposed to conflict and violence. The intractable Middle East conflicts, the attacks on the United States of America in September 2001 and recent events in which Muslim extremists have been implicated in acts of terror have only served to reinforce this widespread perception. To discern the veracity of the assertion that in some special way Islam is inclined towards deadly conflict, it is important to situate the discussion within concrete socio-historical contexts. Moreover, in order to correctly understand the ethical norms of Islam represented in the Muslim sacred scripture, the Qur’an, and in the exemplary conduct of the prophet Muhammad, it is necessary to analyze the historical milieu within which such norms were negotiated.
Understanding the Religiously-Motivated Violence in Islam
Whenever we closely examine the timely and pressing issue of religiously-motivated violence, we see that Christianity and Islam produce very different long-term consequences. This paper will challenge the commonly held belief that Christianity and Islam, as major world religions, are essentially the same when it comes to promoting peace and protecting/advancing basic human rights. There are profound differences that play out – in every generation.
Religion and violence: an ambivalent relationship
Conjectura: Filosofia e Educação. Revista da Universidade de Caxias do Sul. Brasil, 2021
In this paper, we sustain the thesis that there is a violent aspect in the religious attitude. However, it is also true - as paradoxical as it might sound - that religion has been the privileged field to limit all kinds of violence in human societies.
Religion and Violence: A Matter of Approach
Islamic Studies for Human Rights and Democracy, 2016
In this paper, we examine the relationship between religion and violence. The idea is that religion, as a collection of texts, is single, but various kinds of actions have been taken under its name. The reason lies in the fact that religion, as a textual entity, is prone to various interpretations. Each of the interpretations indeed, in its turn, embodies a particular approach to the religion. It is in fact the approach and its resulting interpretation that lead to actions on the part of the believers. Some of the approaches to religion may amount to violence and they have indeed amounted to such a phenomenon. We will conclude that the spiritual approach, as compared with the jurisprudential and theological ones, is less likely to give rise to violence.
Radicalism and the Practice of Violence in the Muslim World
The Canadian Journal for Middle East Studies Vol2 (1) August 2017 , 2017
Religion, politics, society and culture coexist in a melting pot; entwining and clashing amongst one another till the origins of their functions and values are debated much like the chicken and the egg. All occurrences are subject to the questioning of: Is the situation a consequence of the religion or the culture? The political dynamics or societal pressure? Under these circumstances, the inherent spirituality of religions becomes contested as the non-spiritual functions of politics, society, and culture are infused with it. Islam, a historical religion dating back to the 7th century, is under duress as the insurgence and force of radicalism and the use of violence within Muslim nations has strengthened and garnered momentum.
Religious Violence: Fact or Fiction?
The Journal of Human Rights, 2019
The main question of this article is this. Does religion itself play a role in political violence? After clarifying the meaning of relevant terms such as religion, religious violence, secular violence, voluntary action and political violence, I will examine two arguments that can be formulated in favour of the claim that religion itself is the unique cause of the so-called religious type of political violence, concluding that both of these arguments are subject to criticism and neither is successful in supporting that claim. Then I will suggest my own explanation of the real cause and origin of political violence in general and its proper solution. I will also conclude that the well-known distinction between religious and secular violence is not tenable.
An Appraisal that Religion on its Own Does Not Breed Violence
Journal of Business and Econometrics Studies, 2024
It will be rare to have a discussion on human existence without mentioning violence; but it will be unfair to see religion as the main reason for violence. Although, religion has an input in violence, but religion in isolation can't breed violence without the input of some other factors which are further explain in this article. This article adopted qualitative method and secondary data. The secondary data was collected through website, publications, journals and textbooks. The data collected through secondary data reveals that religion on its own does not breed violence but it is a component of violence that can be aided by poverty, inequality, bad governance among other factors.