HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD AND DEMOCRACY IN ZIMBABWE SINCE INDEPENDENCE: AN OVERVIEW. (original) (raw)
Related papers
The 2013 Elections in Zimbabwe: End of an Era for Human Rights Discourse?
This paper examines the implications of Zimbabwe's 2013 harmonised elections on the opposition's continued deployment of the rightsbased discourse to make moral and political claims against and demands of the state. Since 2000, two polarising strands of the human rights discourse -1) the right to self-determination and 2) civil and political rights -were deployed by the state and the opposition, respectively, in order to challenge extant relations and structures of power. The acutely strained state-society relations in post-2000 Zimbabwe emanated from human rights violations by the state as it responded to challenges to its political power and legitimacy. However, the relative improvement in the human rights situation in the country since the 2009 coalition government came into office, and during and since the recently concluded peaceful 2013 elections -the flawed electoral process itself notwithstanding -suggests a need for alternative new ways to make moral and political demands of the state in the future.
Mugabe's Zimbabwe, 2000-2009: Massive Human Rights Violations and the Failure to Protect
2010
This article reviews human rights violations in Zimbabwe from 2000 to 2009, under the rule of Robert Mugabe. It argues that these violations, including state-induced famine, illegal mass expulsions, and systemic rape, constituted crimes against humanity. The article considers what African regional organizations, including the African Union and the Southern African Development Community, and various organs of the international community did, and might have done, to restrain Mugabe and his inner circle from committing these violations. It concludes that the lack of forceful action by African and international organizations constituted a failure to protect the people of Zimbabwe.
A Critique of the Key Legislative Framework Guiding Civil Liberties in Zimbabwe
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 2013
The paper seeks to show the extent to which key legislative provisions have curtailed civil liberties, contrary to the constitutional provisions which seek in theory to promote civil liberties, human rights and citizens' participation in governance. 1 Additionally the paper highlights the gravity of the gross breach of legal provisions that are meant to promote human and civil rights. In addressing these aims the paper responds to the question: To what extent have legal provisions provided for the protection and sustenance of human rights, civil liberties and citizens' participation in governance processes in Zimbabwe over the last two decades? Zimbabwe is a country in the Southern African region and achieved political independence from Britain in 1980 amid much fanfare and pomp, as citizens were promised civil liberties by their political leadership. The constitution adopted then, the Lancaster House Constitution, was a proud document that articulated the civil liberties that people of the country had craved for, over the decades of colonial rule. The post-colonial state undertook several reforms that ranged from gender, constitutional, agrarian to electoral issues, seeking to respond to citizens' demands for the development of an egalitarian society in the country. 2 However, rampant corruption, the taking of arbitrary decisions by the ruling party, ZANU PF, and the commission of gross human rights violations resulted in a gradual disconnection between the ruling elite and the general citizenry.
Human rights in Zimbabwe, Arguments and analysis.docx
Human rights are simply described as either given, fought for, talked about or agreed upon. States usually protect human rights in Bills of Rights. Human rights are fundamental, indivisible, inalienable, interrelated. The right-holder usually protects such rights in a competent court of law.
With the remarkable increase of the advocacy and lobby from human rights activists, trade unions, opposition political parties, CSOs, the church and citizenry for the respect for human rights globally in the 21st century Zimbabwe is no exceptional. The government has been trapped between a hard place and a hard rock as the pressure from these groups continue to increase. The Zimbabwean state security sector is known historically as a brutal sector which undermines the rights of people. In the late 1990s the human rights situation was deteriorated and the rule of law had reached a point of non-existence. The security force was implicated in the human rights abuses since 1999 particularly during the land grabs in 2000, 2002 elections, 2005 Operation Murambatsvina, 2008 Operation Makavhoterapapi, August 1, 2018 shootings and January 2019 abuses among other many episodes of violence and human rights abuses. The purpose of this study was to critically analyse the role of state security vis-à-vis upholding human rights. The Zimbabwean state security is one of sectors whose mandate has not been meaningfully articulated thus inviting a litany of complaints and queries from a variety of sources over the ability of the security sector to fulfil its mandate. The study focuses on the period 1999 to 2019 and it endeavours to establish the degree of compliance to the legal framework by the Zimbabwean state security sector using the data obtained from a variety of stakeholders who interact with the state security agents on regular basis. The thesis thus attempts to review, unpack and deconstructs the main debates and conceptual paraphernalia which have been arraigned to construct the arguments for or against the constitutional mandate of state security in upholding human rights. The fundamental question: what checks and monitoring mechanisms are in place to ensure and guarantee that the state security agents’ act in accordance to the law? Qualitative research design was employed. Purposive sampling was used to select fifty respondents. The research findings indicated that the Zimbabwean state security has been implicated on several occasions for violating and abusing human rights because of its use of lethal force and military tactics on civilians which contravene with the law. The paper recommended that there is need to establish a state security sector discourse whereby the citizenry and the security agents have a dialogue and find a mutual ground. The constitution needs to be aligned and enforced to ensure that it is effective.
Impediments to the Advancement of Human Rights by the ZHRC in Zimbabwe
International Journal of Law and Public Policy
Zimbabwe as a member of the United Nations (UN) ratified a number of human rights treaties and the establishment of the much awaited Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission (ZHRC) which was long overdue was a generally welcome development in the human rights arena. The ZHRC is a National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) established by the Constitution of Zimbabwe (No.20) Act 2013. The Constitution mandates ZHRC to promote, protect and enforce human rights and fundamental freedoms enshrined under the Bill of Rights. The operational legal framework of the ZHRC is provided for in the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission Act [Chapter 10:30]. In collecting data questionnaires, interviews and documentary review were used. Against this backdrop, the paper mainly seeks to explore and analyse the challenges faced by the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission (ZHRC) in executing its mandate. Methodologically, the study relied extensively on available literature and reports. The study revealed that the ZHRC has...
2014
Permission is hereby granted to the Midlands State University library to produce single copies of this dissertation and to lend or to sell such copies for academic purpose. The author reserves My sincere and utmost thanks go to a number of people for their invaluable support during the programme study culminating in this dissertation. I wish to express my heartfelt appreciation, indebtedness and gratitude to my Supervisor Mr D. Munemo for his informed guidance, his intellectual clarity and fixity of purpose remained a source of inspiration throughout the research process and helped to make this study a compressive peace of work. My sincere gratitude also goes to the respondents who took part in this research and special mention also goes to the following organisations for their time and resources: The Zimbabwe Legal Aid Trust, the Legal Resources Foundation, Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights, the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission and the National Constitutional Assembly. A special mention also goes to my wife and kids for their support and understanding. Last but not least I would like to thank the whole MADS class of 2014-Harare Block for the wonderful academic moments shared.
The 2017 military coup in Zimbabwe: Implications for human rights and the rule of law
African Human Rights Law Journal, 2020
November 2017 saw the Zimbabwean Defence Forces executing a military coup against Mr Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe's long-serving President. The military sought to justify the coup on the basis that there were divisions in the party in government-ZANU-PF-and that it was stepping in to protect what it called the gains of the liberation struggle. The military demanded, among other things, the reinstatement of those ZANU-PF party members who had been removed from their government and party positions. By brazenly involving itself in politics, let alone aligning itself with a political party, the military violated a number of constitutional provisions that prohibit the involvement of the security services in politics. Several individual freedoms and liberties, including the right to liberty, freedom of expression, freedom of movement and the right to security and freedom from torture, were violated during the coup. There are also allegations that there was loss of life directly linked to the coup. In effecting the coup, the military immobilised the police service and arrogated to itself the role of civilian policing, including the setting up of roadblocks on major roads and arresting and * LLB (Zimbabwe) LLM (Witwatersrand) LLD (Pretoria); mkhululi.nyathi@gmail. com ** LLB (Zimbabwe) LLM (Midlands State); matshobanancube@gmail.com (2020) 20 AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW JOURNAL 826 detaining those it identified as 'criminal elements'. The Zimbabwean Defence Forces have a long history of serious human rights violations, including politically-related torture and murder. They also stand accused of chronic involvement in politics, including the unleashing of violence during elections on behalf of ZANU-PF. Therefore, there is no hope that human rights protection and promotion will be on the agenda of the post-coup government-itself consisting of the main coup leaders and most of the ministers that served in the repressive Mugabe government. There is a need to establish mechanisms to ensure that those responsible for the coup and its attendant human rights violations and crimes are brought to account.
History, Tyranny and Democracy in Zimbabwe
Africa Spectrum, 2016
Review Article: Michael Bratton (2014), Power Politics in Zimbabwe , Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, ISBN 9781869143114, 280 pp. David Coltart (2016), The Struggle Continues: 50 Years of Tyranny in Zimbabwe , Auckland Park: Jacana Media, ISBN 9781431423187, 646 pp.