The Origins of Creationism in the Netherlands: The Evolution Debate Among Twentieth-Century Dutch Neo-Calvinists (original) (raw)

The Netherlands is, besides the United States, one of the few countries where debates about creationism have been raging for decades. Strict creationism has become deeply rooted in traditional Reformed (Calvinist) circles, which is all the more remarkable as it stemmed from a very different culture and theological tradition. This essay analyses the historical implantation of this foreign element in Dutch soil by investigating the long-term interaction between American creationism and Dutch "neo-Calvinism," a movement emerging in the late nineteenth century, which attempted to bring classical Calvinism into rapport with modern times. The heated debates about evolution in the interbellum period as well as in the sixties-periods characterized by a cultural reorientation of the Dutch Calvinists-turn out to have played a crucial role. In the interbellum period, leading Dutch theologians-fiercely challenged by Calvinist scientists-imported US "flood geology" in an attempt to stem the process of modernisation in the Calvinist subculture. In the sixties many Calvinists abandoned their resistance to evolutionary theory, but creationism continued to play a prominent role as the neo-Calvinist tradition was upheld by an orthodox minority, who (re-)embraced the reviving "Genesis Flood" creationism. The appropriation of American creationism was eased by the earlier Calvinist-creationist connection, but also by "inventing" a Calvinist-creationist tradition, suggesting continuity with the ideas of the founding fathers of neo-Calvinism. This article aims to contribute to a better understanding of what Ronald L. Numbers has recently called the "globalization" of the "science-and-religion dialogue."

Sign up for access to the world's latest research.

checkGet notified about relevant papers

checkSave papers to use in your research

checkJoin the discussion with peers

checkTrack your impact

Creationism in the Netherlands

"Recent events indicate that creationists are becoming increasingly active in the Netherlands. This article offers an overview of these events. First, I discuss the introduction of Intelligent Design (ID) creationism into the Dutch public sphere by a renowned physicist, Cees Dekker. Later, Dekker himself shifted towards a more evolution-friendly position, theistic evolution. Second, we will see how Dekker was followed in this shift by Andries Knevel, who is an important figure within the Dutch evangelical broadcasting group, the Evangelische Omroep. His conversion to ID and, consequently, to theistic evolution, brought him into conflict with young-Earth creationists who still strongly identify themselves with the EO. Third, provoked by the ‘dissidence’ of prominent orthodox believers and the celebrations surrounding the Darwin year, young-Earth creationists became very visible. After three decades of relative silence, they started a project to make sure that the Dutch people would hear of the so-called ‘alternatives’ to evolutionary theory. This article (1) adds to the alarmingly growing number of reports on creationists’ increased activity in Europe; and (2) suggests that ID, in a context different from the United States, did not unite, but rather divided, the Dutch orthodox protestant community."

European Calvinists and the Study of Nature: Some Historical Patterns and Problems

Calvinism and the Making of the European Mind, 2014

Hungary, The Netherlands, England and Scotland. 3 As recent historians of science have said, scientists are often heterodox either in their science or in their theology or both. 4 This also applies to scientists who are Calvinists. I raise the issue of diversity among Calvinists engaged in the study of nature as a caution against easy identification of Calvinism with unique features. This mistake has been thoroughly exposed for Merton's claim about the relationship of puritanism and science. 5 Yet, some of the most recent studies still frame questions or claims about Calvinists and the study of nature in terms of Calvinism as a homogeneous movement. 6 This ignores the variety of views held by individual Calvinists on matters scientific, theological and otherwise. 7 For instance, it would be difficult to explain why the Calvinist astronomer

Towards an integrated understanding of creationism in Europe. Historical, philosophical and educational perspectives

Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen, of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande toestemming van de uitgever.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

Van der Meer, J. M., Oosterhoff, R. “God, Scripture, and the Rise of Modern Science (1200-1700): Notes in the Margin of Harrison’s Hypothesis,” in: Van der Meer, J.M., Mandelbrote, S. (Eds.) Nature and Scripture: History of a Dialogue. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill, 2008: 363-396.