Review of Mary Thomas Crane, Losing Touch with Nature: Literature and the New Science in 16th-Century England. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014). For Journal of British Studies ( 2015) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Eighteenth Century English Periodicals and the Concept of nature
Odisea, 2009
Abstract: The eighteenth century saw the birth of the periodical, which targeted a growing educated English upper-middle class. This class was pragmatic, open-minded, but also materialistic and ambitious. Nature is one of the most frequently-mentioned topics, though its definition ...
Paradigm Shifts During the Global Middle Ages and the Renaissance, 2019
This essay considers the fate of Robert Fludd’s vision of nature and the cosmos, as debated in a pamphlet war in English at the middle of the seventeenth century. It discusses the paradigm shift in thinking about nature that occurred with the Scientific Revolution in England, and notably with the creation of the Royal Society of London in 1660. It also considers discussions of nature in the writing of Robert Boyle, a founding member of the Society, along with treatments of nature in English poetry. Then, after a reconsideration of the fate of analogical thought by later philosophers such as William James, it follows the return of Mother Nature, as a name and concept, during the last century.
This essay begins by arguing that discussions of interdisciplinarity between literature and science have been overly preoccupied by problems of counting: the issue is not that there are or are not Two Cultures, but that we start from defining and delimiting specific numbers of disciplines. It then suggests that that the works of Margaret Cavendish, a philosopher, scientist, playwright, and poet from the mid-seventeenth century, offer two concepts that may help us escape the traps of counting. With her concepts of grounds, she insists on fiction or literature as a mode of rationality parallel to and comparable to reason or science. She also attempts to re-orient contemporary debates about the possible grounds of scientific knowledge, insisting that Nature herself, in all of her variety, must serve as the ground or basis of nature. The essay then shows that the concept of the creature, as Cavendish develops it in her late works, offers a generative model for thinking about combination, cooperation, and association, and might therefore be a useful concept for helping us think beyond the numbering of disciplines.
Literature and Science in Enlightenment Britain: New Directions
Literature Compass
Despite predictions of its impending doom in the late 1970s, the field of literature and science continues to f lourish, especially among scholars of eighteenth-century British literature. This essay identifies four main areas of research in this field: poetry and performance, fiction, new ontologies, and politics and gender. It argues that although scholars continue to study the inf luence of scientific ideas on literary texts, the most ambitious new work explores the relationship between science and literature through the analysis of shared rhetorical practices and common epistemological and ontological structures. In a " State of the Field " essay published in the journal Isis in 1978, George Rousseau sounded a note of alarm about the future of literature and science as a field of study. A sharp drop in the membership of its Modern Language Association division and a decline in the number of articles listed under the " Literature and Science " heading in the annual bibliography of the journal Clio were signs, he feared, that the theory revolution of the 1970s was fatally undermining the field established by Marjorie Hope Nicolson and A. O. Lovejoy in the 1940s. What use would a new generation of scholars formed by structuralism, psychoanalysis, and Foucault have for painstaking intellectual histories of the lines of thought linking a period's science to its works of literature? Quite a lot, as it turned out. Four decades on, things could hardly look more different. Far from undermining the field, the theoretical ferment of the 1970s led to a dramatic new surge of interest in literature and science, eventually consolidated in the foundation of the Society for the Study of Literature, Science, and the Arts in the mid-1980s and its f lagship journal Configurations in 1993. The 1980s also saw a f lurry of essay collections, including two with a particular focus on the 18th century (Jordonova, Christie and Shuttleworth). Momentum has shown no signs of f lagging since the millennium. The growth of science studies as a dynamic interdisciplinary field and the f lourishing of Science and Technology Studies programmes at universities around the world have provided intellectual impetus and institutional structure for an astonishingly wide range of new work. Yet if Rousseau's fears about the decline of literature and science proved unwarranted, he was surely right to sense that the inf lux of theory into English departments in the 1970s and 1980s would have the effect of fragmenting the field by proliferating critical approaches and by shifting the ultimate focus of inquiry away from traditional intellectual histories of science's " inf luence " on literature. The rise of cultural studies and New Historicism, the emergence of science studies, and the cultural turn in the history of science in particular have illuminated previously unthought-of points of contact and modes of interaction by undermining traditional distinctions between literary and scientific texts. Scientific knowledge is now understood to be made rather than simply discovered and thus to depend on many of the same discursive techniques, forms, and assumptions involved in the making of a literary text. As James J. Bono has recently observed, the common thread that binds together new work in literature and science is " analytic attention to the performative effects and affordances of literary and linguistic
The Oeconomy of Nature: Literature and Ecology in the English Renaissance
2012
My dissertation focuses on the development of the proto-ecological concept of “the oeconomy of nature” in works of literature and natural philosophy of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Tracing interconnections between the discourse of estate management and the rhetoric of natural philosophy, I find that “oeconomy” (the early modern art of household management) provides a conceptual vocabulary through which thinkers understood the natural world as a self-regulating system made up of independent agents. Through readings of Edmund Spenser, Ben Jonson, George Herbert, Kenelm Digby, Margaret Cavendish, and John Milton, my dissertation challenges recent accounts of early modern environmental thought by highlighting the historicity of concepts such as “ecology” and “environment” and by unearthing an alternative terminology that early modern thinkers used to understand the material world. The first three chapters trace a genealogy of the oeconomy of nature in the writings of natural...