The Ecology of Standards Processes: Insights from Internet Standard Making (original) (raw)
Related papers
Defending the spirit of the web: Conflicts in the internet standards process
2003
ABSTRACT The creation and adoption of standards is often modeled as a game between large corporate players. Alternatively, the standards process can be modeled as the actions of a set of actors in a network. A third perspective is also possible–standards can be seen as the outgrowth of the technical ideas of the participants and the technical community they consider themselves part of. This work focuses on applying all three perspectives on the development of web services choreography standards.
The evolution of IT standards in academic and commercial communities
International Journal of Quality and Standards, 2008
This paper considers the emergence of institutions developing standards in a rapidly evolving area of information technology: Grid computing. Grid computing, with its aim of organizations sharing computer resources, inherently depends upon standardization. As grid computing as a technology has developed the community of actors involved has grown from a small homogeneous core of users in research institutes into a global constituency embracing large IT system vendors, leading to the formation of overlapping bodies outside the structures of formal international standardization to reconcile the needs of this diverse group. The study on which this paper is based formed one of a series of seven case studies exploring the social networks within which e-business standards are being negotiated, undertaken within the NO-REST research project, an EU research project studying the dynamics of e-business standardization (http://www.no-rest.org). This paper discusses the expansion of the Grid constituency, explores the tensions and alliances between the two major constituencies forming the global Grid community, industry and academia, and considers how standardization processes have evolved to accommodate these dynamics. It is found that with growing commercial participation, the future of the Grid is being shaped by three trends: strong competition between the large Grid industry actors, tight collaboration between industry and academia in standardizing the Grid, and the collaborative bodies formed to develop Grid standards increasingly becoming the arenas in which the technology is developed, alliances formed and conflicts resolved.
The Emergence of Standards: A Meta-Analysis
2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), 2007
This paper provides a list of factors that influence the outcome of standard battles. We have developed this list by performing a meta-analysis of 103 papers. An extensive literature study has revealed 31 factors which we have grouped under five categories: superior design, mechanisms, stakeholders, dominant agent, and strategy. We discuss the relations between the factors and we have applied the set of factors to an example of a standardization battle: the video case.
2006
ABSTRACT Standardization processes are quickly replacing regulation and competition as the primary method that technical specifications are deployed as rules, guidelines, or definitions of characteristics that ensure materials, products, processes and services are consistently fit for their purposes. Importantly, for Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), there is an evolution in the process used by standards-development organizations (SDOs) and this is changing the prevailing standards development activity (SDA) for ICT. The process is progressing away from traditional SDA modes: the legacy de jure standards promulgation by regulators that typically involve the selection from many candidates and existing alternative components. Increasingly, standards development is moving towards voluntary consensus consortia, venues in which there is a more design intensive crafting of standards that include a substantial design component, also known as “anticipatory” standards. Standards that include a substantial design component require increasingly important roles from organizational players as well as SDOs. These processes are increasingly characterized by the presence of intellectual property rights and collective behaviors alleged to trigger legal issues in antitrust, the First Amendment and tort law. An analysis of recent and likely influential series of holdup cases, such as the Rambus appeal, is also instructive. Few theoretical frameworks exist to understand these emerging processes. This research is influenced by the design, sense-making and negotiation (DSN) theoretical framework. DSN suggests viewing the new standards-setting processes as a complex interplay among these three forces. The DSN model provides the framework for measuring SDO progress and therefore understanding future generations of standards development processes. This research conducted archival analysis of SDO documents for a selected subset of web-services (WS) standards taken from publicly available sources including minutes of meetings, proposals, drafts and recommendations. This work provides a deeper understanding of SDAs, the roles played by different organizational participants and the compliance with SDO due process requirements emerging from public policy constraints, recent legislation and standards accreditation requirements. This paper examines the public policy principles in use to evaluate the due process mechanisms and checks and balances in SDA. These must be better understood to inform a critique of proposed reforms so they might accommodate efficiency, expertise and participation incentives. The empirically grounded results of our studies are useful foundation for other SDO modeling efforts.
No Standard for Standards: Understanding the ICT Standards Development Ecosystem
The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law , 2017
There is no standard for standards. Technology standards are created, maintained and propagated in a bewildering variety of ways, by a diverse set of actors. This Chapter attempts to explain this ironic and complex reality, and to provide a framework for understanding different standards development models in the information and communications technology (ICT) industry.
The role of the standards process in shaping the Internet
Proceedings of the IEEE, 2000
This paper explores the role of the standards process in shaping the future evolution of the Internet. It addresses the industry's need to develop and deploy unique functionality and how it interacts with the communicating users' need for universally available and consistently implemented services, and the role that the standard bodies play in resolving this tension. A brief overview of the organization of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), and more specifically of its operating mode to promote the emergence of new standards for the Internet, is presented. An outline of some of the main topics under discussion currently is offered. The evolution of the attendance to the IETF meetings during recent years is commented upon.
An Empirical Study of Standards Development for E-Businesses: A Social Network Perspective
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), 2006
Research on the nature of e-business standards and the organizational context in which they are developed has received little attention in the literature of IT standards and standardization. This study investigates communication patterns in online standards groups to provide insights into the nature of group dynamics among standards decision makers and its relation to the standards context. Email data is used from the ebXML standards initiative. Findings suggest that standards groups operating on the Internet appear to form a cohesive structure, despite the fact that they tend to consist of large group of participants coming from various backgrounds and industries, while their communication patterns are influenced by standards orientation. Policy implications for managers in online standards groups are presented.
Institutionalization of e-business Standards
Workshop on Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems, Seattle, WA, 2003
This paper addresses the formation of standards in business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce. The contrast between the developing of generic standards and sector specific standards is considered and the argument that users will commit to developing sectoral standards while IT vendors will direct their resources to generic standards is restated. Specifically, the emergence of the OASIS committee developing a Universal Business Language is considered. The claim that the OASIS process is open and that all interested ...
Standards as change agents in the information technology market
Computer Standards & Interfaces, 1991
Bonino. M.J. and M.B. Spring, Standards as change agents in the information technology market. Compuler Standards & Interfaces 12 (1991) 97-107. Standards have historically evolved from the codification of existing practices that had achieved market dominance. This paper reviews the evolution of standards and the standardization efforts in the information technology industry. Classificatory, descriptive, and explanatory models of the standardization process are reviewed. A model is proposed that classifies standards in the broad categories of reference, design, and implementation standards and suggests that reference standards might better be understood in terms of their role in shaping future developments. The model further classifies standards in terms of the computational process they accommodate and the user function they perform providing a broad framework for compatibility standards in the information technology arena.
Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards
Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1997
Abstact--This paper focuses on the processes producing the standards which make up the technical back-bone of an information infrastructure. These standards are neither ready-made nor neutral. They are currently being developed, and they 'inscribe' behaviour in complex and non-transparent ways. We explore how this takes place, identifying by whom, where and how inscriptions are made. Our principal aim is to uncover the socio-technical complexity of establishing an information infrastructure, a complexity which so far has been severely underestimated by those involved. By studying the process of aligning and linking one inscription to other inscriptions, we also hope to learn more about the strength of inscriptions, that is, the degree to which an inscription actually succeeds in enforcing a desired behaviour. The empirical basis of our analysis is a case-study of standardization processes of health information infrastructure from Norway.