Identification of putative sites of interaction between the human formyl peptide receptor and G protein (original) (raw)

Agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the formyl peptide receptor is regulated by the membrane proximal region of the cytoplasmic tail

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, 2009

Formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is a chemoattractant G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) involved in the innate immune response against bacteria. Receptor activation is terminated by receptor phosphorylation of two serine-and threonine-rich regions located in the distal half of the cytoplasmic tail. In this study we show that introduction of an amino acid with a bulky side chain (leucine or glutamine) adjacent to a single leucine, L320, in the membrane-proximal half of the cytoplasmic tail, significantly enhanced receptor phosphorylation, β-arrestin1/2 translocation, and receptor endocytosis, without affecting G i -mediated ERK1/2 activation and release of intracellular calcium. In addition, the point mutations resulted in diminished susceptibility to trypsin, suggesting a conformation different from that of wild type FPR. Alignment of the FPR sequence with the rhodopsin sequence showed that L320 resides immediately C-terminal of an amphipathic region that in rhodopsin forms helix 8. Deletion of seven amino acids (Δ309-315) from the predicted helix 8 of FPR (G307-S319) caused reduced cell signaling as well as defects in receptor phosphorylation, β-arrestin1/2 translocation and endocytosis. Thus, the amino acid content in the N-terminal half of the cytoplasmic tail influences the structure and desensitization of FPR.

Characterization of the binding site on the formyl peptide receptor using three receptor mutants and analogs of Met-Leu-Phe and Met-Met-Trp-Leu-Leu

Journal of Biological …, 2000

The formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is a chemotactic G protein-coupled receptor found on the surface of phagocytes. We have previously shown that the formyl peptide binding site maps to the membrane-spanning region (Miettinen, H. M., Mills, J. S., Gripentrog, J. M., Dratz, E. A., Granger, B. L., and Jesaitis, A. J. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 4045-4054). Recent reports have indicated that nonformylated peptides, such as MMWLL can also activate this receptor (Chen, J., Bernstein, H. S., Chen, M., Wang, L., Ishi, M., Turck, C. W., and Coughlin, S. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23398 -23401.) Here we show that the selectivity for the binding of different NH 2 -terminal analogs of MMWLL or MLF can be markedly altered by mutating Asp-106 to asparagine or Arg-201 to alanine. Both D106N and R201A produced a similar change in ligand specificity, including an enhanced ability to bind the HIV-1 peptide DP178. In contrast, the mutation R205A exhibited altered specificity at the COOH terminus of fMLF, with R205A binding fMLF-O-butyl > fMLF-O-methyl > fMLF, whereas wt FPR bound fMLF > fMLF-O-methyl ϳ fMLF-O-butyl. These data, taken together with our previous finding that the leucine side chain of fMLF is probably bound to FPR near FPR 93 VRK 95 (Mills, J. S., Miettinen, H. M., Barnidge, D., Vlases, M. J., Wimer-Mackin, S., Dratz, E. A., and Jesaitis, A. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10428 -10435.), indicate that the most likely positioning of fMLF in the binding pocket of FPR is approximately parallel to the fifth transmembrane helix with the formamide group of fMLF hydrogenbonded to both Asp-106 and Arg-201, the leucine side chain pointing toward the second transmembrane region, and the COOH-terminal carboxyl group of fMLF ion-paired with Arg-205. . 1 The abbreviations used are: FPR, formyl peptide receptor; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; wt, wild type; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; GTP␥S, guanosine 5Ј-3-O-(thio)triphosphate.

Experimental evidence for lack of homodimerization of the G protein-coupled human N-formyl peptide receptor

The Journal of …, 2003

A large number of G protein-coupled receptors have been shown to form homodimers based on a number of different techniques such as receptor coimmunoprecipitation, cross-linking, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. In addition, functional assays of cells coexpressing a mutant receptor with a wild-type receptor have shown receptor phenotypes that can best be explained through dimerization. We asked whether the human neutrophil N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) forms dimers in Chinese hamster ovary cells by coexpressing wild-type FPR with one of two mutants: D71A, which is uncoupled from G protein, and N297A, which has a defect in receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis. Experiments measuring chemotaxis, ligand-induced release of intracellular calcium, and p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation did not show an inhibitory effect of the coexpressed FPR D71A mutant. Coexpressed wild-type receptor was efficiently internalized, but failed to correct the endocytosis defects of the D71A and the N297A mutants. To explore the possibility that the mutations themselves prevented dimerization, we examined the coimmunoprecipitation of differentially epitope-tagged FPR. Immunoprecipitation of hemagglutinin-tagged FPR failed to coimmunoprecipitate coexpressed c-myc-tagged FPR and vice versa. Together, these data suggest that, unlike many other G proteincoupled receptors, FPR does not form homodimers.

Effect by a Mutation Affecting the Transmembrane Envelope Glycoprotein

1990

The cytopathic effects of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection are specific for cells that express the CD4 viral receptor and consist of syncytium formation and single-cell lysis. Here we report that a mutation (517A) affecting the amino terminus of the HIV-1 gp4l transmembrane envelope glycoprotein resulted in a virus that was markedly less cytopathic than was wild-type HIV-1. In systems in which cell-to-cell transmission of HIV-1 occurred, the replication ability of the 517A virus was comparable with that of the wild-type virus. Even though the levels of viral protein expression, virion production, and interaction of the envelope glycoproteins with CD4 were similar for the 517A and wild-type viruses, both syncytium formation and single-cell lysis were attenuated for the 517A mutant virus. These results demonstrate that an envelope glycoprotein region important for mediating post-receptor binding events in cell membrane fusion is important for the induction of cyto...

Formyl Peptide Receptor N Human Homodimerization of the G Protein-Coupled Experimental Evidence for Lack of and

2003

A large number of G protein-coupled receptors have been shown to form homodimers based on a number of different techniques such as receptor coimmunoprecipitation, cross-linking, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. In addition, functional assays of cells coexpressing a mutant receptor with a wild-type receptor have shown receptor phenotypes that can best be explained through dimerization. We asked whether the human neutrophil N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) forms dimers in Chinese hamster ovary cells by coexpressing wild-type FPR with one of two mutants: D71A, which is uncoupled from G protein, and N297A, which has a defect in receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis. Experiments measuring chemotaxis, ligand-induced release of intracellular calcium, and p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation did not show an inhibitory effect of the coexpressed FPR D71A mutant. Coexpressed wild-type receptor was efficiently internalized, but failed to correct the endocytosis defects of the D71A and the N297A mutants. To explore the possibility that the mutations themselves prevented dimerization, we examined the coimmunoprecipitation of differentially epitope-tagged FPR. Immunoprecipitation of hemagglutinin-tagged FPR failed to coimmunoprecipitate coexpressed c-myc-tagged FPR and vice versa. Together, these data suggest that, unlike many other G proteincoupled receptors, FPR does not form homodimers.

Multiple Activation Steps of the N -Formyl Peptide Receptor †

Biochemistry, 1999

The human N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is representative of a growing family of G proteincoupled receptors (GPCR) that respond to chemokines and chemoattractants. Despite the importance of this receptor class to immune function, relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms involved in their activation. To reveal steps required for the activation of GPCR receptors, we utilized mutants of the FPR which have previously been shown to be incapable of binding and activating G proteins. For this study, the FPR mutants were expressed in human myeloid U937 cells and characterized for functions in addition to G protein coupling, such as receptor phosphorylation and ligand-induced receptor internalization. The results demonstrated that one of the mutants, R123G, though being unable to activate G protein, was capable of undergoing ligand-induced phosphorylation as well as internalization. Receptor internalization was monitored by following the fate of the ligand as well as by directly monitoring the fate of the receptor. The results with the R123G mutant were in contrast to those obtained for mutants D71A and R309G/ E310A/R311G which, though being expressed at the cell surface and binding ligand, were incapable of being phosphorylated or internalized upon agonist stimulation. These results suggest that following ligand binding at least two "steps" are required for full activation of the wild-type FPR. That these observations may be of more general importance in GPCR-mediated signaling is suggested by the highly conserved nature of the mutants studied: D71, R123, and the site represented by amino acids 309-311 are very highly conserved throughout the entire superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. Models of receptor activation based on the observed results are discussed.

trans-Golgi retention of a plasma membrane protein: mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of the asialoglycoprotein receptor subunit H1 result in trans-Golgi retention

The Journal of Cell Biology, 1995

Unlike the wild-type asialoglycoprotein receptor subunit H1 which is transported to the cell surface, endocytosed and recycled, a mutant lacking residues 4-33 of the 40--amino acid cytoplasmic domain was found to be retained intracellularly upon expression in different cell lines. The mutant protein accumulated in the trans-Golgi, as judged from the acquisition of trans-Golgi-specific modifications of the protein and from the immunofluorescence staining pattern. It was localized to juxtanuclear, tubular structures that were also stained by antibodies against galactosyltransferase and -y-adaptin. The results of further mutagenesis in the cytoplasmic domain indicated that the size rather than the specific sequence of the cytoplasmic domain deter-mines whether H1 is retained in the trans-Golgi or transported to the cell surface. Truncation to less than 17 residues resulted in retention, and extension of a truncated tail by an unrelated sequence restored surface transport. The transmembrane segment of H1 was not sufficient for retention of a reporter molecule and it could be replaced by an artificial apolar sequence without affecting Golgi localization. The cytoplasmic domain thus appears to inhibit interaction(s) of the exoplasmic portion of H1 with trans-Golgi component(s)

The First and Second Cytoplasmic Loops of the G-Protein Receptor, Rhodopsin, Independently Form β-Turns †

Biochemistry, 1997

The cytoplasmic face of the transmembrane protein, rhodopsin, is made up of one carboxyl terminal and three cytoplasmic loops connecting six of the seven transmembrane helices. Neither the high-resolution, three-dimensional structure of this G-protein receptor nor any other cell surface receptor is known. In this work, the structures of peptides containing the amino acid sequence of the first and second cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin have been determined. Both loops show ordered structures in solution. In both loops, the ends of the transmembrane helices unwind and form a-turn. The conformations of the two loops are remarkably similar, even though their sequences are not. These data suggest a structural motif for short loops in transmembrane proteins. The well-ordered structures of these loops, in the absence of the transmembrane helices, indicate that the primary sequences of these loops stabilize the-turn. These data further suggest that the loops may contribute to the folding of such membrane proteins during their synthesis and insertion into membranes.