Percutaneous Transhepatic Removal of Bile Duct Stones: Results of 261 Patients (original) (raw)
Related papers
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2000
Background: The preferred treatment for stones in the bile duct is endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by stone extraction. When this fails, percutaneous treatment is an alternative to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rate of percutaneous treatment. Methods: Between April 1990 and April 1997, a total of 31 consecutive patients (20 men, 11 women, mean age 70.1 years) underwent percutaneous treatment of bile duct stones (average of 2.2 per patient, range 1 to 10). The percutaneous treatment was considered successful if all stones could be removed. Time and number of sessions needed for imaging, percutaneous treatment, and complications were scored. Results: Twenty-seven patients (87%) were free of stones after 2 to 15 sessions (mean 5.6). The median time for treatment was 16 days (3 to 299). Complications occurred in 3 of the 31 patients: one myocardial infarction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, one pancreatitis, and one bacteremia. None of these complications were life threatening. Four patients (13%) underwent surgery after failed percutaneous treatment. Conclusion: Percutaneous treatment of bile duct stones is an alternative with a high success rate when endoscopic stone removal fails. Surgery can be avoided in nearly 90% of cases.
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 2017
Background and aim of the work Around 10-18% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones have common bile duct (CBD) stones. Treatment can be provided as open cholecystectomy plus open CBD exploration, laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC+LCBDE), or precholecystectomy or postcholecystectomy endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) in two stages for CBD clearance. The aim of this study is to compare the CBD clearance rate by each procedure in a well-equipped tertiary center. Patients and methods A total of 250 patients with choledocholithiasis were included from the General Surgery Department, Sohag and Assiut University Hospitals, and managed randomly by either conventional surgery, endoscopic, or laparoscopic procedures. Results The ages of our patients ranged from 20 to 60 years (mean=40 years), with a slight female predominance (1.6 : 1); most of them presented with calcular obstruction (54.3%). However, there were also other presentations such as colic, cholangitis, or accidental discovery in 14.3, 10, and 21.5%, respectively. Patients were categorized randomly into three groups: group I included 100 patients (40%) who were treated by open choledocholithotomy and T-tube insertion; the operative time was 90 (60-180) min, with the success rate of the attempted procedures reaching 100%, and CBD clearance of stones was achieved in 95% of cases (five cases of missed stones). Hospital stay was 8 (5-12) days, with no mortality, and morbidity rate reached 15% in the form of wound infection, bile leak, and missed stone. The patient could return to work after 2 weeks (12-20 days). Group II included 100 patients (40%) treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy; basket extraction was performed in 45%, balloon in 25%, the combined maneuver in 15%, and mechanical lithotripsy in 13%, with failure of the technique in two cases (2%); the duration of the procedure was about 30 (20-45) min, with a success rate of attempted procedures of 98%, and CBD clearance of stones was achieved by 100%, with no mortality; the morbidity rate was 9% in the form of cholangitis (3%) and mild pancreatitis with hyperamylasemia (6%). The period of hospital stay was 1 (1-2) days and the patient returned to work after 3 (2-5) days. Group III included 50 patients (20%) treated by laparoscopic approaches: transcystic approaches in five cases and transcholedochotomy approaches in 45 cases. Choledochoscopic exploration was performed in almost all cases (45 cases) to detect, extract the stones, and test CBD clearance, and there was conversion to open techniques in one case. The time needed for this procedure was 123 (70-292) min, with CBD clearance of stones in 96% (two cases of missed stone), with no mortality, and a morbidity rate of about 10% in the form of mild hyperamylasemia, fever, and missed stone. The period of hospital stay was 3.2 (2-4) days, with return to work after 7 (5-10) days. Conclusion Both ERCP/LC and LCBDE were highly effective in CBD clearance, and equal in terms of the overall cost and patient acceptance. However, the overall duration of hospitalization was shorter for LCBDE with elimination of the potential risks of ERCP-associated pancreatitis, further procedures, and anesthesia risks. It is feasible, cost-effective, and ultimately should be available for most patients in each specialized center.
Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: A Comprehensive Review
Biomedical Sciences, 2020
Bile duct stones (BDS) are usually secondary to gallstones but may be found primarily in biliary system, although the percentage is minimal. They are usually suspected on history and clinical examination alone but symptoms may be variable ranging from asymptomatic to complications such as biliary colic, pancreatitis, jaundice or cholangitis, the latter can be life-threatening in some patients. Abnormalities in the liver function tests especially the elevated direct bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase indirectly raise the suspicion. The majority of BDS can be diagnosed by Transabdominal Ultrasound, but in some cases further imaging such as, Computed Tomography, Endoscopic Ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography are employed prior to endoscopic or laparoscopic removal. Approximately 90% of BDS can be removed following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERC) + sphincterotomy. Most of the remaining stones can be removed using mechanical lithotripsy. Patients with uncorrected coagulopathies may be treated with ERC + pneumatic dilatation of the sphincter of Oddi. Shockwave lithotripsy (intraductal and extracorporeal) and laser lithotripsy have also been used to fragment large bile duct stones prior to endoscopic removal. Despite all the minimally invasive procedures the role of open surgery for the removal of difficult or impacted stones cannot be completely forgotten. The role of medical therapy in treatment of BDS is currently uncertain. This review focuses on the clinical presentation, investigation and current management of BDS.
2012
BACKGROUND The presence of stones in the common bile duct (CBD) may cause complications such as obstructing jaundice or ascending cholangitis, and the stones should be removed. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of percutaneous elimination of CBD stones from the gallbladder through the papilla. METHODS During a 4 year period, six patients (five men and one woman, mean age 71.5 years) who had CBD stones and an existing gallbladder drain underwent percutaneous stone push into the duodenum after balloon dilatation of the papilla, with a diameter equal to that of the largest stone. Access into the CBD was from the gallbladder, using an already existing percutaneous gallbladder drain (cholecystostomy tube). RESULTS Each patient had one to three CBD stones measuring 7-14 mm. Successful CBD stone elimination into the duodenum was achieved in five of the six patients. The single failure occurred in a patient with choledochal diverticulum, who was operated successfully. There were no major or...
Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Stones Removal — An Effective and Safe Alternative
Hong Kong Journal of Radiology, 2020
Introduction: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary stone removal is a well-established treatment for biliary stone disease, as an alternative to the standard endoscopic or surgical approaches. We present our experience in biliary stone removal via the percutaneous transhepatic route, focusing on the techniques, clinical success rate, and complications. Methods: Data on all percutaneous transhepatic biliary stone removals performed at our institution between January 2014 and May 2017 were extracted from patient records. Clinical outcomes, procedure success rate, and complication rate were analysed. Results: In total, 33 procedures were performed in 27 consecutive patients (24 men, 3 women, median age 78.0 years; range, 55-92 years). Reasons for percutaneous transhepatic biliary stone removal included contra-indication to or failure of endoscopic removal (prior gastrectomy or duodenal surgery, n = 19; failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cannulation, n = 3; duodenal stenosis, n = 3; and hepaticojejunostomy stricture, n = 1), and one patient had intrahepatic ductal stones not amenable to endoscopic removal. The overall clinical success rate was 90.9%, with an initial procedure success of complete ductal clearance achieved in 24 cases (72.7%) after the first attempt. Stone removal was unsuccessful in two cases, and incomplete stone removal was present in one case, which were all related to unfavourable biliary anatomy. There were no significant complications (0%) or mortality (0%). The mild complication rate was 15.2% (mild haemobilia, n = 5). Conclusion: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary stone removal is an effective and safe procedure. It is a reliable alternative for patients when endoscopic or surgical approaches are not feasible or unsuccessful.
Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in nonagenarians: a tertiary centre experience
Clinical Endoscopy
Background/Aims: There are few studies assessed the efficacy and mortality of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones in the elderly aged ≥90 years. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic removal of CBD stones in nonagenarians.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed ERCP reports for CBD stone removal. The endoscopic and therapeutic outcomes were collected. The length of stay (LOS), the total number of adverse events, and mortality rate were compared between groups.Results: A total of 125 nonagenarians were compared with 1,370 controls (65–89 years old individuals). The mean LOS for nonagenarians was significantly higher than in controls (13.6 days vs. 6.5 days). Completed intended treatment was similar in the nonagenarians and controls (89.8% and 89.5%, respectively). The overall complication rate did not differ between the groups. However, nonagenarians had a higher incidence of post-ERCP pneumonia (3.9%)...
Advances in Therapeutic Endoscopic Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones
World Journal of Surgery, 1998
Advances in cannulation techniques and instruments have helped in difficult bile duct cannulation and thus stone extraction. For small common bile duct (CBD) stones, endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation has been proposed as an alternative to endoscopic papillotomy (EPT). The technique must undergo further evaluation before recommending its routine use. For most patients with bile duct stones, EPT remains the method of choice. Out of 8204 patients treated in three surgical endoscopy centers (Chile, Germany, and India), 86% to 91% of all CBD stones could be extracted subsequently after EPT using a Dormia basket; 4% to 7% required mechanical lithotripsy (ML) before removal and 3% to 10% of the patients needed other sophisticated techniques, such as electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL), or extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The local expertise and availability of equipment determines the choice of method used. In general, EHL or LISL is used for impacted CBD stones including stones in Mirizzi syndrome refractory to ML. ESWL is best suited for intrahepatic stones. Permanent stenting can be offered to poor risk patients instead of extensive procedures to clear the bile duct. Using currently available nonsurgical techniques, fewer than 1% of all patients with bile duct stones still require surgical intervention.
Endoscopic Management of the Difficult Bile Duct Stones: A Single Tertiary Center Experience
Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2016
Background. Most common bile duct (CBD) stones can be removed with standard techniques using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but in some cases additional methods are needed. In this study we aimed to investigate the management of patients with difficult stones and the factors that affect the outcome of patients that have undergone periodic endobiliary stenting. Materials and Methods. Data of 1529 patients with naive papilla who had undergone ERCP with an indication of CBD stones was evaluated retrospectively. Stones that could not be removed with standard techniques were defined as “difficult stones.” Cholangiograms of patients who had difficult stones were revised prospectively. Results. Two hundred and eight patients (13.6%) had difficult stones; 150 of these patients were followed up with periodic endobiliary stenting and successful biliary clearance was achieved in 85.3% of them. Both CBD (p<0.001) and largest stone size (p<0.001) were observed to be...
International Surgery Journal
Background: The aim of the study was to determine the best treatment modality for common bile duct stone become more challenging as large number of options available such as endoscopic, laparoscopic or open surgical methods, we need to choose specific therapy according to patient’s clinical conditions, and individual expertise.Methods: It is prospective study including 60 patient having common bile duct stone along with gall bladder stone, its different modality of management and its inference, conducted in Bhopal Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, Bhopal, during period of January 2017 to January 2020.Results: In 60 cases 41 patients undergoes to endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) first, stone successfully removed in 34 patients and stent placed, one patients developed pancreatitis after ERCP, managed conservatively, In 6 patients retained stone after ERCP procedure, one patients developed surgical emphysema after procedure, managed with ICD and conservativel...
Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy as a reliable rescue procedure for complicated bile duct stones
Surgical endoscopy, 2017
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with stone extraction is generally accepted as first line management for common bile duct (CBD) stones. CBD exploration, either by open or laparoscopic approach nowadays, is usually reserved for ERCP failures, complicated stone locations, along with altered anatomical situations. The aim of this study was to highlight the increasing role of laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy which is not only a reliable but also as a rescue procedure for those failed ERCP cases due to complicated bile duct stones. It is a retrospective review of the database, from a tertiary care teaching institution from India, from Jan 2012 up to December 2016. Out of total 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy, 28 had failed ERC stone clearance while two patients were directly offered drainage in view of unfavorable anatomy. The major reasons for failed ERC stone clearance were as follows-multiple large calculi (42.8%), recurrent stone...