Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation (original) (raw)

Abstract

Recent advances in building information modelling (BIM) have disseminated the utilization of multidimensional (nD) CAD information in the construction industry. Nevertheless, the overall and practical effectiveness of BIM utilization is difficult to justify at this stage. The purpose of this paper is to propose a BIM framework focusing on the issues of practicability for real-world projects. Even though previous efforts in the BIM framework have properly addressed the BIM variables, comprehensive issues in terms of BIM effectiveness need to be further developed. A thorough literature review of computer-integrated construction (CIC) and BIM was performed first in order to interpret the BIM from a global perspective. A comprehensive BIM framework consisting of three dimensions and six categories was then developed to address the variables for theory and implementation. This framework can provide a basis for evaluating promising areas and identifying driving factors for practical BIM effectiveness.

Key takeaways

sparkles

AI

  1. The proposed BIM framework addresses practical implementation across three dimensions and six categories.
  2. BIM's effectiveness in construction needs further development to justify its practical benefits.
  3. The framework categorizes BIM into 'technology', 'perspective', and 'business functions' for systematic analysis.
  4. Integration of 3D models into various construction functions enhances BIM applications and analyses.
  5. Strategic managerial issues significantly influence the successful implementation of BIM in construction projects.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (47)

  1. AIA, A working definition -integrated project delivery, American Institute of Architects (AIA) California Council, USA, 2007.
  2. B. Akinci, M. Fischer, J. Kunz, R. Levitt, Automated generation of work spaces required by construction activities, CIFE Working Paper #58, 2000.
  3. Architosh, Architosh BIM Survey Reports TOCs, http://architosh.com/2010/03/ architosh-bim-survey-reports-tocs/, 2010.
  4. R. Barak, Y.-S. Jeong, R. Sacks, C.M. Eastman, Unique requirements of building information modelling for cast-in-place reinforced concrete, Journal of Comput- ing in Civil Engineering, ASCE 23 (2) (2009).
  5. D. Bouchlaghem, A.G. Kimmance, C.J. Anumba, Integrating product and process information in the construction sector, Industrial Management & Data Systems 104 (3) (2004) 218-233.
  6. C.H. Caldas, L. Soibelman, Integration of Construction Documents in IFC Project Models, Construction Research Congress -Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation of Construction (2003).
  7. D. Chantawit, B.H.W. Hadicusumo, C. Charoenngam, 4D CAD-safety: visualizing project scheduling and safety planning, Construction Innovation 5 (2005) 99-114.
  8. P.S. Chinowsky, K.F. Reinschmidt, Qualitative geometric reasoner for integrated design, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE 9 (4) (1995) 250-258.
  9. M. Cho, Development of Construction project management, Final research report to Korean Ministry of Science and Technology, Project: 98-NE-04-03-A, Seoul, Korea, 2000.
  10. N. Dawood, E. Sriprasert, Z. Mallasi, B. Hobbs, Development of an integrated information resource base for 4D/VR construction processes simulation, Auto- mation in Construction 12 (2) (2003) 123-131.
  11. C.-W. Feng, Y.-J. Chen, J.-R. Huang, Using the MD CAD model to develop the time- cost integrated schedule for construction projects, Automation in Construction 19 (3) (2010) 347-356.
  12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Classification of Informa- tion in the Construction Industry, Technical Report 14177, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994.
  13. R. Jongeling, T. Olofsson, A method for planning of work-flow by combined use of location-based scheduling and 4D CAD, Automation in Construction 16 (2) (2007) 189-198.
  14. Y. Jung, S. Chin, K. Kim, Informatization index for the construction industry, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE 18 (3) (2004) 267-276.
  15. Y. Jung, G.E. Gibson, Data sharing effectiveness for computer integrated construction, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 14 (5) (1998) 371-377.
  16. Y. Jung, G.E. Gibson, Variation in CIC driving factors based upon types of construction contracts, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Automation Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, 1998, p. 199.
  17. Y. Jung, G.E. Gibson, Planning for Computer Integrated Construction, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE 13 (4) (1999) 217-225.
  18. Y. Jung, S. Kang, Knowledge-based standard progress measurement for integrated cost and schedule performance control, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE 133 (1) (2007) 10-21.
  19. Y. Jung, S. Kang, Y. Kim, C. Park, Assessment of safety management information systems for general contractors, Safety Science, Elsevier 46 (4) (2008) 661-674.
  20. Y. Jung, S. Woo, S.H. Kang, B.N. Lee, Effects of CM contracts on the management technology in the Korean construction industry, Journal of the Korea Society of Civil Engineers 22 (3-D) (2002) 483-495.
  21. S. Kang, Y. Jung, Automated Progress Measurement for Construction Projects, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Construction Engineering and Management (ICCEM-ICCPM 2009), Jeju, Korea, 1068-1074.
  22. H. Kim, F. Grobler, Building ontology to support reasoning in early design, Proceeding of the 2007 ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, 2007.
  23. P.J. Kirs, G.L. Sanders, R.P. Cerveny, D. Robey, An experimental validation of the Gorry and Scott Morton framework, MIS Quarterly 13 (2) (1989) 183-197.
  24. B. Koo, M. Fischer, Feasibility study of 4D CAD in commercial construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 126 (4) (2000) 251-260.
  25. W. Kymmell, Building information modelling -planning and managing construction projects with 4D CAD and simulations, McGraw-Hill books, USA, 2008.
  26. J. Lertlakkhanakul, J.W. Choi, M.Y. Kim, Building data model and simulation platform for spatial interaction management in smart home, Automation in Construction 17 (8) (2008) 948-957.
  27. Z. Ma, Q. Shen, J. Zhang, Application of 4D for dynamic site layout and management of construction projects, Automation in Construction 14 (3) (2005) 369-381.
  28. A. Mahalingam, R. Kashyap, C. Mahajan, An evaluation of the applicability of 4D- CAD on construction projects, Automation in Construction 19 (2) (2010) 148-159.
  29. MasterFormat, Construction Specifications Institute (CSI), Alexandria, Va.
  30. K. McKinney, M. Fischer, Generating, evaluating and visualizing construction schedules with CAD tools, Automation in Construction 7 (6) (1998) 433-447.
  31. Y. Miyatake, R. Kangari, Experiencing computer integrated construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE 119 (2) (1993) 307-322.
  32. J.D. Naumann, The Role of Frameworks in MIS Research, Proceedings of the 1986 Decision Sciences Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii (1986) 569-571.
  33. R. Navon, Y. Shpatnitsky, Field experiments in automated monitoring of road construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE 131 (4) (2005) 487-493.
  34. A. Russell, S. Staub-French, N. Tran, W. Wong, Visualizing high-rise building construction strategies using linear scheduling and 4D CAD, Automation in Construction 18 (2) (2009) 219-236.
  35. R. Sacks, R. Barak, Impact of three-dimensional parametric modelling of building on productivity in structural engineering practice, Automation in Construction 17 (4) (2008) 439-449.
  36. V.E. Sanvido, D.J. Medeiros, Applying computer-integrated manufacturing con- cepts to construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE 116 (2) (1990) 365-379.
  37. A. Schlueter, F. Thesseling, Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages, Automation in Construction 18 (2) (2009) 153-163.
  38. M. Spearpoint, Transfer of architectural data from the IFC building product model to a fire simulation software tool, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering 17 (4) (2007) 271-292.
  39. B. Succar, Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders, Automation in Construction 18 (3) (2009) 357-375.
  40. J.E. Taylor, P.G. Bernstein, Paradigm trajectories of building information modelling practice in project networks, Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE 25 (2) (2009) 69-76.
  41. P. Teicholz, M. Fischer, Strategy for computer integrated construction technology, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE 120 (1) (1994) 117-131.
  42. J. Tobin, atomicBIM: Splitting Data to Unleash BIM's Power, http://www.aecbytes. com/buildingthefuture/2008/atomicBIM.html, 2008.
  43. C.V. Treeck, E. Rank, Dimensional reduction of 3D building models using graph theory and its application in building energy simulation, Engineering with Computers An International Journal for Simulation-Based Engineering 23 (2) (2006) 109-122.
  44. Uniclass, Uniclass: Unified Classification for the Construction Industry, RIBA Publications, London, 1997.
  45. Webster, Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Merriam-Webster Inc, Springfield, Massachusetts, 1986.
  46. K. Wender, R. Hubler, Enabling more human-oriented exploration of complex building information models, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE 23 (2) (2009) 84-90.
  47. N. Yabuki, T. Shitani, A Management System for Cut and Fill Earthworks Based on 4D CAD and EVMS, Computing in Civil Engineering, Proceedings of the 2005 ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, 2005, p. 152.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What are the key variables in the proposed BIM framework?add

The BIM framework identifies six major variables categorized into three dimensions: BIM technology, perspective, and construction business functions.

How does BIM improve integration in construction business functions?add

BIM enhances integration by bridging parametric data with non-parametric data, effectively facilitating design, estimating, and scheduling among 14 distinct business functions.

What are the core aspects of maturity in BIM utilization?add

BIM maturity encompasses four phases: visualization, coordination, analysis, and supply chain integration, with significant practical benefits in supply chain redesign for organizations.

What distinguishes the definitions of CIC and BIM in research?add

While CIC emphasizes corporate strategy and management integration, BIM focuses on 3D graphic data utility and evolved towards complex engineering applications and analyses.

What challenges exist in achieving economically feasible integrated systems?add

Practical effectiveness of integrated systems remains hard to justify economically, as highlighted by early findings in CIC implementations where full-range integration was less effective.

Last updatedOctober 11, 2025