Pride and Prejudice: An Afghan and Liberian Case Study on Civil-Military Interaction in Post-Conflict Recovery (original) (raw)
Related papers
Prism: A Journal of the Center for Complex Operations, 2013
Foreign internal conflicts clearly remain a permanent feature of the U.S. foreign policy landscape, especially since the United States regularly participates in efforts to stabilize countries affected by conflict and then helps them recover afterwards. Yet U.S. government officials and the American public in general have difficulty accepting the inevitability of U.S. involvement in such efforts.To ensure lasting progress and security in post-conflict situations, the United States must adjust its approach from a focus on large military operations to preparing adequately for small-scale, long-term interventions. Most U.S. military deployments since the end of the Cold War have been in "small wars" or what the Department of Defense once called "military operations other than war."1 Yet the military has usually been more prepared to fight large, technologically advanced wars than smaller contingencies that require greater integration with civilian capacities. As a co...
At the end of military intervention: editors' introduction
The focus of much of the scholarship and comment on Western military operations in recent years has been on the decisions, manner, and relative success of interventions, and there has been considerable interest in, and criticism of, the subsequent insurgencies and counter-insurgency measures these created in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2001 and 2014. Rather less attention has been paid to practical problems and local experiences at the end of military intervention, namely, transition, handover, or withdrawal. Moving beyond the focus on exit strategies, this introduction discusses key concepts and themes at the operational and tactical levels and provides a granular look at a series of post-1945 exits and power transfers.
Journal of Central and Eastern European African Studies, 2022
Before the 1990s, the practice of post-conflict management mainly focused on military and law-enforcement priorities. Since then, a development-oriented approach has evolved by making a greater sense of the better addressing of the root causes and characteristics of conflicts, as well as the needs and motivations of actors and individuals. In the same vein, critical approaches to the traditionally „minimalist” approach suggested a relatively new, community-based practice that may help to better understand the complex political, psychological and economic situation in local terms to enhance the efficiency of reintegration of former combatants and make them socially and politically represented after conflicts end.At the same time, according to Mary Kaldor’s theory, we have witnessed meaningful qualitative changes regarding the nature of armed conflicts which pose vital challenges to the Westphalian international system as they reshape the concept of sovereignty and question the state monopoly on violence. Proponents of the “new war” thesis argue that such qualitative changes in wars also necessitate a fundamental shift from the traditional peacebuilding approaches. In Kaldor’s view, as a consequence of the rapid globalisation during the 1990s and the never-ending erosion of state sovereignty a fundamentally new theoretical framework is needed in the course of peace operations which is entirely different from the former so-called „liberal peace”. Thus, the new characteristics of wars pointed out by Kaldor may have a great significance in how peacebuilding and DDR programmes should be planned and implemented in post-conflict settlements.In this analysis the question is how the failure of traditional disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) programmes and the prospective new generation of them reflect to „new wars” theories, particularly to Kaldor’s thesis, so what connections they may have, if any. The author makes this search through a Liberian case study. The focal points of the analysis include: actors (1); motivations and goals (2); brutality and the victimisation of the civilians (3); and economic and financial characteristics (4).
From Civil Strife to Civil Society: civil and military responsibilities in disrupted states
Refugee Survey Quarterly, 2003
The United Nations University is an organ of the United Nations established by the General Assembly in 1972 to be an international community of scholars engaged in research, advanced training, and the dissemination of knowledge related to the pressing global problems of human survival, development, and welfare. Its activities focus mainly on the areas of peace and governance, environment and sustainable development, and science and technology in relation to human welfare. The University operates through a worldwide network of research and postgraduate training centres, with its planning and coordinating headquarters in Tokyo. Preface and acknowledgements The problems of disrupted states, and the responsibilities assumed by international civilian and military personnel in attempting to rescue the hapless peoples of such states from the perils which disruption creates, have long occupied the headlines in a range of states. The deployment in Kosovo of NATO forces, together with civilians from many countries under the auspices of a UN mission, is but the latest reminder of how challenging such responsibilities can be. This book seeks to illuminate the nature of these problems and responsibilities, and to identify some of the steps which might be taken to smooth the path from civil strife to civil society. The book had its origins in two conferences. The first was held in Canberra in July 1999 under the joint sponsorship of the Australian Defence Studies Centre,