Genocide as Predation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Thesis Eleven , 2023
A. Dirk Moses' The Problems of Genocide builds on his decades of work in the field of genocide research. This review article looks at the impact the book has had to date before considering its two key arguments-that genocide's invention in the 1940s distilled a centuries old 'language of transgression', which in turn served to justify and normalise what Moses dubs 'liberal permanent security'. I conclude by considering the possibilities and limits of 'conceptual history'.
Genocide: An Historical Human Response to Fear, Greed, and Ignorance
Genocide has been with us in varying degrees' since we left the trees for the savannahs. In all phases of human existence, in nearly every part of the world, genocide is an indivisible part of our history. Humans have an incredible capacity for marginalizing others, for supporting their oppression and annihilation. I suggest genocide is a survival strategy long since adapted to our existence.1 Hundreds of millions of people have met their death in brutal genocidal episodes throughout our history. Neanderthal remains from the Troisième cave of Goyet (Belgium) dating back some 40,000 years is substantial evidence of cannibalism, possibly as a force of genocide.2 Our argument is genocide did not begin in 1940, nor was the 1940s Shoah different from a core element to the mindset of superiority in the rise of the State that has been a part of the human experience since the Bronze Age and perhaps even before then. There is a belief that there are others who serve that superiority because they are not like us because they stand in the way of our progress, our survival, or their God is not our God. While recognizing the Shoah was horrific, and it does serve modernity as the worst kind of barbarity. Further, we assert that that violence begets violence, that ignorance feeds grief, fear, and greed; that genocide becomes a
Genocide and Violence: An Introduction.
Genocidal Violence, 2023
Genocide is, in many ways, a dogmatic concept. It has, therefore, recently been criticized as too narrow or limited because it excludes numerous victim groups and their respective genocide-related identities not covered by the definition of the UN Genocide Convention (1948). This is to be considered "an unprecedented progressive step in the history of international law" but requires adjustments and a broadened scope to include so far unprotected victim groups. Furthermore, especially with regard to Germany, discussions and reflections about genocide are very much centered on the experience of the Holocaust. The relationship between colonialism and National Socialism was already addressed by contemporaries such as Raphael Lemkin, Hannah Arendt, and Aimé Césaire. After the turn of the millennium, the question has been raised in a historiographical context. Jürgen Zimmerer and others have addressed connections, structural parallels, and direct continuities from European colonialism and imperialism to the Holocaust, especially with regard to the German genocide against the Herero and Nama in what was then German Southwest Africa in 1904-1908. ...
2020
This book is concerned with the connection between the formal structure of agency and the formal structure of genocide. The contributors employ philosophical approaches to explore the idea of genocidal violence as a structural element in the world. Logics of Genocide will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in philosophy, critical theory, genocide studies, Holocaust and Jewish studies, history, and anthropology.