A Confluent Reduction for the Extensional Typed lambda-Calculus with Pairs, Sums, Recursion and terminal Object (original) (raw)

1993

We add extensional equalities for the functional and product types to the typed λ-calculus with not only products and terminal object, but also sums and bounded recursion (a version of recursion that does not allow recursive calls of infinite length). We provide a confluent and strongly normalizing (thus decidable) rewriting system for the calculus, that stays confluent when allowing unbounded recursion. For that, we turn the extensional equalities into expansion rules, and not into contractions as is done traditionally. We first prove the calculus to be weakly confluent, which is a more complex and interesting task than for the usual λ-calculus. Then we provide an effective mechanism to simulate expansions without expansion rules, so that the strong normalization of the calculus can be derived from that of the underlying, traditional, non extensional system. These results give us the confluence of the full calculus, but we also show how to deduce confluence without the weak confluence property, using only our technique of simulating expansions.

A confluent reduction for the extensional typed λ − calculus with pairs , sums , recursion and terminal object

1993

We add extensional equalities for the functional and product types to the typed λ-calculus with not only products and terminal object, but also sums and bounded recursion (a version of recursion that does not allow recursive calls of infinite length). We provide a confluent and strongly normalizing (thus decidable) rewriting system for the calculus, that stays confluent when allowing unbounded recursion. For that, we turn the extensional equalities into expansion rules, and not into contractions as is done traditionally. We first prove the calculus to be weakly confluent, which is a more complex and interesting task than for the usual λ-calculus. Then we provide an effective mechanism to simulate expansions without expansion rules, so that the strong normalization of the calculus can be derived from that of the underlying, traditional, non extensional system. These results give us the confluence of the full calculus, but we also show how to deduce confluence directly form our simula...

Rewriting with extensional polymorphic λ-calculus

1996

We provide a confluent and strongly normalizing rewriting system, based on expansion rules, for the extensional second order typed lambda calculus with product and unit types: this system corresponds to the Intuitionistic Positive Calculus with implication, conjunction, quantification over proposition and the constant True.

Combining first order algebraic rewriting systems, recursion and extensional lambda calculi

Automata, Languages and Programming, 1994

It is well known that confluence and strong normalization are preserved when combining left-linear algebraic rewriting systems with the simply typed lambda calculus. It is equally well known that confluence fails when adding either the usual extensional rule for η, or recursion together with the usual contraction rule for surjective pairing.

Combining algebraic rewriting, extensional lambda calculi, and fixpoints

1996

It is well known that confluence and strong normalization are preserved when combining algebraic rewriting systems with the simply typed lambda calculus. It is equally well known that confluence fails when adding either the usual contraction rule for η, or recursion together with the usual contraction rule for surjective pairing.

An arithmetical proof of the strong normalization for the $ lambda$-calculus with recursive equations on types

2009

We give an arithmetical proof of the strong normalization of the lambda\lambdalambda-calculus (and also of the lambdamu\lambda\mulambdamu-calculus) where the type system is the one of simple types with recursive equations on types. The proof using candidates of reducibility is an easy extension of the one without equations but this proof cannot be formalized in Peano arithmetic. The strength of the system needed for such a proof was not known. Our proof shows that it is not more than Peano arithmetic.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.