Cold War Nationalism in Samsun (original) (raw)
Related papers
Nationalism in Turkey: Response to a Historical Necessity
The purpose of this article is to cast some light on the question as why and how nationalism appeared rather suddenly on the political stage in Turkey at the beginning of the 20 th century. This article asserts that Turkish nationalism was an answer to the particular historical conditions that characterised the final phases of the Ottoman Empire and the birth of the modern Turkey. This article specifies some of these conditions and argues that, rather than emerging ex nihilo Turkish nationalism was in fact continuation of the attempts undertaken by the Ottoman rulers and the Young Turks in order to prevent the disintegration of the Empire by inventing integrative ideologies such as Ottomanism, Pan-Islamism and Pan-Turanism.
The Islamization of Turkish nationalism in Cold War Turkey, 1965-1980 (Master's thesis)
2022
This thesis explores the relationship between the far-right Turkish nationalism and Islam between 1965, when Alparslan Türkeş entered multiparty politics, and 1980, when the coup d'état which subsequently led to the closing of his political party took place. The main question that drives this work is, how has the far–right Turkish nationalism, which included a significant, if not dominant presence of secular nationalists in 1965, turned into an ideology that championed the Turkish-Islamic synthesis as of 1980? The convergences, divergences and exchanges between nationalism and Islamism are presented within an intellectual history framework. A variety of primary sources, such as nationalist political magazines, memoires, books, and election campaign materials were used. Three overarching arguments are reached by their analysis. First, Islamic themes have been increasingly abundant in nationalist ideology; a significantly Islamized nationalism, especially among the youth has come into existence as the dominant strand in far-right by 1980. Second, the Turkish-Islamic synthesis has had an uneasy nature despite nationalists' attempts to reconcile the two, causing constant tension. Third, Türkeş's approach to religion was an instrumentalist one; the main function of Islam in his ideology was as a source of high morality, which he considered necessary for national development.
THE RISE OF TURKISH NATIONAL IDENTITY A Thesis Submitted.to the Department
2015
This thesis deals with the rise of Turkish national identity and the emergence of Turkish nationalism. In doing so, it begins by providing a lieterature review and a theoretical analyses of nationalism in general and Turkish nationalism in particular. This study argues that there is no unique way of studying the rise of Turkish nationalism, because of the wide range of theories on nationalism, various interpretations about the origins of nationalist movements and different historical facts. The thesis focuses on the historical background of Turkish nationalism at the last quarter of the 19th century. In this period, the Young Ottomans were the most important figures in the formation of national identity. They introduced the ideas of patriotism and nationalism to the Ottoman public for the first time and their influence on the thought and action of the generations that followed was extremely influential. After the Young Ottoman Era, The Young Turks and the Committee of Union and Prog...
Political views such as Ottomanism, Islamism and Turanism (Turkism) were experienced by Ottoman Empire in last and longest century in order to protect his integration better. Newborn Republic took over ideological legacy of the Ottoman Empire largely and transformed it with a new style. Nationalist ideology, that continues its evolution in anti-communist conjuncture during the Cold War, has again changed its imagination with emerging the problem of ethnic nationalism after the 1980s. The traces of nationalism, which has a particular goal but does not have a way that is exactly certain, are tried to be followed from the Ottoman to Turkey. We carefully elected some important actors and their perceptions in order to understand and compare better the reality of national cases.
Turkish Nationalism in Eastern Turkistan
2008
Eastern Turkistan is a residential area which is situated on the Turkistan hinterland defined as “homeland” of Turks; which has spiritual importance for both Republic of Turkey and other Central Asian Turkish Republics. As, “the autonomy” given to the Turks of Eastern Turkistan by Chinese Government is pretended, debate on Eastern Turkistan have become a persistent matter requiring international interest. In this context, it is necessary to follow rebellious attempts going on for centuries in China don’t source from a simple obstinacy. It is doubtless beyond question how much strong the national will of just 30-40 million populations against the population exceeding one billion is. Currently, the passive boycott attempts against Chinese state and the rebellious attempts carried out together with other counter groups but resulted in failure, and sometimes the diplomatic actions carried on abroad aiming to support the democratic-nationalist strive of Turks of Eastern Turkistan. Lastly...
Umut Uzer's An Intellectual History of Turkish Nationalism offers a textual analysis of the ideational grounds and developments of Turkish nationalism from the late Ottoman Empire to the present. The book's overarching argument is that in the course of its " ideological odyssey, " Turkish nationalism has evolved from a modern, secular, progressive, and even revolutionary idea—which the author loosely associates with early Kemalist thinking—to a " conservative " and patriarchal ideational formation that embrace traditional, exclusionary, and Islamic values. Uzer mainly credits the transition to multiparty democracy in the 1950s for this transformation but also emphasizes other factors, including the republic's gradual welcoming of Islamic ideals and groups into political life, the Cold War dynamics and anxieties about communism, and urbanization. In mapping this transformation, the book covers an impressive range of primary literature including not only the nationalist thinkers such as Ziya Gökalp who commonly feature in studies of Turkish nationalism, but also, more usefully, neglected figures such as Nihal Atsız, the influential proponent of Turkish racism. Indeed, the book's strongest contribution is its comprehensive analysis of racist thought and ethnic nationalism in modern Turkey. Thus, in addition to Uzer's analysis of the racial components of Turkish nationalism, the expansive primary sources contained within the book make it an important and useful resource for students and scholars interested in the region and era, but who cannot read Ottoman and Turkish. There are, however, three criticisms that could be raised against this otherwise important book. The first concerns style. Despite bringing together close readings of an impressive body of literature, some of which appears for the first time in English, the texts covered are not situated within a broader theoretical structure. Nor does the book offer a theoretically rich account of them. Instead, the presentation takes the form of descriptions and summaries of different texts, leaving the reader craving a more robust analysis of their theoretical depth and structure. The second point concerns the book's main argument about the evolution of Turkish nationalist thought from a relatively progressive and revolutionary ideational form to a more right wing and Islamist ideology. While not novel in the scholarship, this argument endorses a somewhat romanticized