Genomics and breast cancer: the different levels of inherited susceptibility (original) (raw)
Related papers
Genetic Heterogeneity and Penetrance Analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Breast Cancer Families
The American Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to inherited breast cancer was assessed by linkage and mutation analysis in 237 families, each with at least four cases of breast cancer, collected by the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Families were included without regard to the occurrence of ovarian or other cancers. Overall, disease was linked to BRCA1 in an estimated 52% of families, to BRCA2 in 32% of families, and to neither gene in 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6%-28%), suggesting other predisposition genes. The majority (81%) of the breast-ovarian cancer families were due to BRCA1, with most others (14%) due to BRCA2. Conversely, the majority of families with male and female breast cancer were due to BRCA2 (76%). The largest proportion (67%) of families due to other genes was found in families with four or five cases of female breast cancer only. These estimates were not substantially affected either by changing the assumed penetrance model for BRCA1 or by including or excluding BRCA1 mu-tation data. Among those families with disease due to BRCA1 that were tested by one of the standard screening methods, mutations were detected in the coding sequence or splice sites in an estimated 63% (95% CI 51%-77%). The estimated sensitivity was identical for direct sequencing and other techniques. The penetrance of BRCA2 was estimated by maximizing the LOD score in BRCA2-mutation families, over all possible penetrance functions. The estimated cumulative risk of breast cancer reached 28% (95% CI 9%-44%) by age 50 years and 84% (95% CI 43%-95%) by age 70 years. The corresponding ovarian cancer risks were 0.4% (95% CI 0%-1%) by age 50 years and 27% (95% CI 0%-47%) by age 70 years. The lifetime risk of breast cancer appears similar to the risk in BRCA1 carriers, but there was some suggestion of a lower risk in BRCA2 carriers !50 years of age.
Genetic heterogeneity in hereditary breast cancer: Role of BRCA1 and BRCA2
The American Journal of Human Genetics, 1996
The common hereditary forms of breast cancer have been largely attributed to the inheritance of mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. However, it is not yet clear what proportion of hereditary breast cancer is explained by BRCA1 and BRCA2 or by some other unidentified susceptibility gene(s). We describe the proportion of hereditary breast cancer explained by BRCA1 or BRCA2 in a sample of North American hereditary breast cancers and assess the evidence for additional susceptibility genes that may confer hereditary breast or ovarian cancer risk. Twenty-three families were identified through two high-risk breast cancer research programs. Genetic analysis was undertaken to establish linkage between the breast or ovarian cancer cases and markers on chromosomes 17q (BRCA1) and 13q (BRCA2). Mutation analysis in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was also undertaken in all families. The pattern of hereditary cancer in 14 (61%) of the 23 families studied was attributed to BRCA1 by a combination of linkage and mutation analyses. No families were attributed to BRCA2. Five families (22%) provided evidence against linkage to both BRCA1 and BRCA2. No BRCA 1 or BRCA2 mutations were detected in these five families. The BRCA1 or BRCA2 status of four families (17%) could not be determined. BRCA1 and BRCA2 probably explain the majority of hereditary breast cancer that exists in the North American population. However, one or more additional genes may yet be found that explain some proportion of hereditary breast cancer.
Breast cancer susceptibility genes: Options for those carrying BRCA1 mutations
Archive of oncology, 2002
The discovery of the association between breast and ovarian cancer and the BRCA genes and the development of methods for genetic testing made it possible to screen women for genetic predisposition to develop hereditary breast cancer (HBC). Parallelly, prevention strategies, including clinical, surgical and medical interventions become available in order to reduce cancer risk. In a meantime, we became aware of limitations of genetic testing from the aspect of BRCA gene penetrance, negative result interpretation etc. All of these, together with data that invasive prevention strategies such as prophylactic surgery demonstrate better results in risk reduction than regimens including self and clinical-examination, face BRCA mutation carriers with difficult choice for risk reduction options. Therefore, the patients at high risk of HBC can best make informed decisions when guided by a multidisciplinary genetic counseling team.
The genetics of breast cancer: risk factors for disease
The Application of Clinical Genetics, 2011
The genetic factors known to be involved in breast cancer risk comprise about 30 genes. These include the high-penetrance early-onset breast cancer genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, a number of rare cancer syndrome genes, and rare genes with more moderate penetrance. A larger group of common variants has more recently been identified through genome-wide association studies. Quite a number of these common variants are mapped to genomic regions without being firmly associated with specific genes. It is thought that most of these variants have gene regulatory functions, but their precise roles in disease susceptibility are not well understood. Common variants account for only a small percentage of the risk of disease because they have low penetrance. Collectively, the breast cancer genes identified to date contribute only ∼30% of the familial risk. Therefore, there is much interest in accounting for the missing heritability, and possible sources include loss of information through ignoring phenotype heterogeneity (disease subtypes have genetic differences), gene-gene and gene-environment interaction, and rarer forms of variation. Identification of these rarer variations in coding regions is now feasible and cost effective through exome sequencing, which has already identified high-penetrance variants for some rare diseases. Targeting more 'extreme' breast cancer phenotypes, particularly cases with early-onset disease, a strong family history (not accounted for by BRCA mutations), and with specific tumor subtypes, provides a route to progress using next-generation sequencing methods.
Common genetic variants and modification of penetrance of BRCA2-associated breast cancer
PLoS genetics, 2010
The considerable uncertainty regarding cancer risks associated with inherited mutations of BRCA2 is due to unknown factors. To investigate whether common genetic variants modify penetrance for BRCA2 mutation carriers, we undertook a two-staged genome-wide association study in BRCA2 mutation carriers. In stage 1 using the Affymetrix 6.0 platform, 592,163 filtered SNPs genotyped were available on 899 young (,40 years) affected and 804 unaffected carriers of European ancestry. Associations were evaluated using a survival-based score test adjusted for familial correlations and stratified by country of the study and BRCA2*6174delT mutation status. The genomic inflation factor (l) was 1.011. The stage 1 association analysis revealed multiple variants associated with breast cancer risk: 3 SNPs had p-values,10 25 and 39 SNPs had p-values,10 24 . These variants included several previously associated with sporadic breast cancer risk and two novel loci on chromosome 20 (rs311499) and chromosome 10 (rs16917302). The chromosome 10 locus was in ZNF365, which contains another variant that has recently been associated with breast cancer in an independent study of unselected cases. In stage 2, the top 85 loci from stage 1 were genotyped in 1,264 cases and 1,222 controls. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for stage 1 and 2 were combined and estimated using a retrospective likelihood approach, stratified by country of residence and the most common mutation, BRCA2*6174delT. The combined per allele HR of the minor allele for the novel loci rs16917302 was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.86, p~3:8|10 {5 ) and for rs311499 was 0.72 (95% CI 0.61-0.85, p~6:6|10 {5 ). FGFR2 rs2981575 had the strongest association with breast cancer risk (per allele HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.18-1.39, p~1:2|10 {8 ). These results indicate that SNPs that modify BRCA2 penetrance identified by an agnostic approach thus far are limited to variants that also modify risk of sporadic BRCA2 wild-type breast cancer.
Familial Cancer, 2008
Though much progress has been made in understanding the role of two major high-risk breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, it remains unclear what causes the observed variation in risk between mutation carriers. This marked variability in individual cancer risk both between and within BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier families may be partly explained by modifier genes that influence mutation penetrance. Defining these modifiers should help refine individual cancer risk estimates and is also expected to be an efficient method to identify further BC susceptibility alleles in general. This approach is predicated on the concept that variants in genes that are low to moderate penetrance predisposition genes are likely to have a larger risk modification effect in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Association studies are usually used to assess the influence of variants in biologically plausible candidate loci on the penetrance of BRCA1/2 mutations (i.e., differences in age of onset or tissue-specificity of disease). Several such modifier loci, including the genes AIB1 and AR involved in hormone metabolism, and the RAD51 gene acting in DNA repair, have been proposed in the literature. A consortium of laboratories (CIMBA) has recently confirmed the RAD51 135 G/C variant as a BC risk modifier in BRCA2 mutation carriers, though not in BRCA1 carriers. This review describes molecular epidemiological efforts to evaluate the potential influence of polymorphic variants in candidate modifier genes on the risk of BC conferred by the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
Genetic alterations in hereditary breast cancer
Genetic linkage studies have led to the identification of highly penetrant genes as the possible cause of inherited cancer risk in many cancer-prone families. Most women with a family history of breast/ ovarian cancer have tumors characterized by alterations in particular genes, mainly BRCA1 and BRCA2, but also CHK2, ATM, STK11 and others. This paper examines the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, focusing on the Italian pattern of mutations. The function of these two genes, classified as tumor suppressors, is linked with key metabolic mechanisms such as DNA damage repair, regulation of gene expression and cell cycle control. The pathological BRCA allelic variants may cause alteration of protein function, transcriptional activity and DNA repair; accumulation of the defects leads to widespread chromosome instability that may be directly responsible for cancer formation. In fact, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, conferring a highly increased susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer, do not lead to cancer by themselves. The current consensus is that these are 'caretaker' genes, which, when inactivated, allow other genetic defects to accumulate. The nature of these other molecular events may define the pathway through which BRCA1 and BRCA2 act. The BRCA mutation spectrum is complex, and the significance of most nucleotide alterations is difficult to understand. Moreover, the mutation pattern seems to be related to ethnicity. The Italian Consortium of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer has reviewed 1758 families; 23% have been found to be carriers of pathogenetic mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Founder mutations have been described in geographically restricted areas of Italy; a regional founder effect has been demonstrated in Italy for the mutations BRCA1 5083del19 and BRCA2 8765delAG, and a probable new founder mutation has been characterized in Tuscany. The presence of founder mutations has practical implications for genetic testing.
How Much of Familial Breast Cancer Risk is Currently Explained by the Known Genes?
Current Women's Health Reviews, 2012
The need to answer the question "how much of the familial risk is currently explained by the known genes?" has increased ,and although BRCA1 and BRCA2 are considered the two major breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes, they do not justify the entire percentage of all hereditary BC cases. The current consensus is that other BC predisposing genes could explain at least a portion of the remaining non-mutated familial cases, including not only other highpenetrance BC genes, but also moderate and low-penetrance genes. Considering these three different categories of genes, a gap of risk estimation in breast cancer can be observed. Moreover, different researchers tried to give significance to the mutations identified in terms of family management but the way in which these common variants contribute to cancer is still largely unknown. It has been recently proposed that the 'rare variant hypothesis', a model in which the summation of the effects of a series of low frequency gene variants, could justify a great portion of the inherited susceptibility to relatively common human diseases, such as breast cancer, independently by their way of acting. However, this hypothesis is still debated due the fact that there is little or no evidence about the fitness effects of common, disease-associated variants.
Non-BRCA1/2 Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 2017
Twenty percent of breast cancer cases may be related to a genetic mutation conferring an increased risk of malignancy. The most common and prominent breast cancer susceptibility genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2, found in nearly 40% of such cases. However, continued interest and investigation of cancer genetics has led to the identification of a myriad of different breast cancer susceptibility genes. Additional genes, each with unique significance and associated characteristics, continue to be recognized. Concurrently, advanced genetic testing, while still controversial, has become more accessible and cost-effective. As oncologic and reconstructive advances continue to be made in prophylactic breast reconstructive surgery, patients may present to plastic surgeons with an increasingly more diverse array of genetic diagnoses to discuss breast reconstruction. It is therefore imperative that plastic surgeons be familiar with these breast cancer susceptibility genes and their clinical implications. We, therefore, aim to review the most common non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer susceptibility genetic mutations in an effort to assist plastic surgeons in counseling and managing this unique patient population. Included in this review are syndromic breast cancer susceptibility genes such as TP53, PTEN, CDH1, and STK11, among others. Nonsyndromic breast cancer susceptibility genes herein reviewed include PALB2, CHEK2, and ataxia telangiectasia mutated gene. With this knowledge, plastic surgeons can play a central role in the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment, including successful breast reconstruction, of all patients carrying genetic mutations conferring increased risk for breast malignancies.