Mind, Market and Society, Network Structures in the Work of F. A. Hayek (original) (raw)
How markets emerge, function, and remain in existence (or are reproduced) are problems that economists have hardly addressed. One of the exceptions is Friedrich Hayek. Between the second half of the 1930s and the early 1960s he formulated a number of ideas about these topics. Historically, these were inspired by his very early work on cognitive psychology, which in the 1950s was one of the sources of neural network models. Among the features that found their way from his cognitive psychology into his market models are the distributed nature of knowledge in a system and its coordination by means of a self organizing process. Systematically, Hayek's ideas on markets and competition are part of his larger research programme in economics. This programme aimed at developing a theory of disequilibrium growth in an intertemporal general equilibrium framework. Hayek's writings do not constitute a systematic theory of dynamic market phenomena. However, they contain a number of insights that have hardly been noticed. With hindsight, we may observe that these ideas are part of what sociologists would call a network model. The main characteristics of such models are described. Some recent applications of sociological network theory to market phenomena, notably by Harrison White and Ronald Burt, are very much in the spirit of Hayek, without being influenced by him. The same is the case within economics, where network approaches are much rarer. The economists Alan Kirman and Robert Gilles have indicated ways to develop network models for understanding markets. Like Hayek's ideas, these are extensions of a general equilibrium approach. An economist who was inspired by Hayek but who does not explicitly present his analysis as a network model is George Richardson. The works mentioned have not been integrated, and together they cover the problems of the emergence, functioning and reproduction of markets in a very gappy way.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Retrospectives: Friedrich Hayek and the Market Algorithm
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017
Friedrich A. Hayek (1899–1992) is known for his vision of the market economy as an information processing system characterized by spontaneous order: the emergence of coherence through the independent actions of large numbers of individuals, each with limited and local knowledge, coordinated by prices that arise from decentralized processes of competition. Hayek is also known for his advocacy of a broad range of free market policies and, indeed, considered the substantially unregulated market system to be superior to competing alternatives precisely because it made the best use of dispersed knowledge. Our purpose in writing this paper is twofold: First, we believe that Hayek's economic vision and critique of equilibrium theory not only remain relevant, but apply with greater force as information has become ever more central to economic activity and the complexity of the information aggregation process has become increasingly apparent. Second, we wish to call into question Hayek&#...
«Introduction–Hayek's grand research programme»
1994), Hayek, Co-ordination and Evolution: His legacy …, 1994
Many of the institutions on which human achievements rest have arisen and are functioning without a designing and directing mind . . . the spontaneous collaboration of free men often creates things which are greater than their individual minds can ever fully comprehend'.
Markets as Economizers of Information: Field Experimental Examination of the'Hayek Hypothesis'
2010
Abstract: The work of Friedrich Von Hayek contains several testable predictions about the nature of market processes. Vernon Smith termed the most important one the'Hayek Hypothesis': equilibrium prices and the gains from trade can be achieved in the presence of diffuse, decentralized information, and in the absence of price-taking behavior and central market direction. Vernon Smith tested this by surveying data on laboratory experimental markets and found strong support.
Economic Interactions on Networks
Social network analysis and graph theoretical elements are incorporated into the hayekian capital theory in order to better illustrate its core concepts. Graph theory and an agentbased model are applied to formalize the heterogeneity of capital and the production process as a network, or ecology, of firms. A highly connected market could lead to multiple equilibria with only one on them yielding a Pareto situation. We show here that the greater the number of relational ties among firms, the more complex and productive the underlying production process of an evolving capital network. Empirical research from a social network analysis of Silicon Valley and financial ties in the Chicago area illustrate the main points.
F.A. Hayek: the radical economist
If anything like a change in direction can be distinguished in the development of the work of Friedrich August von Hayek, it does not lie in his supposed abandoning of the idea of equilibrium (which is based on a mistaken interpretation of his work). It is rather the transition of a radically systematic approach to problems and the elaboration of their solution that is characterized by a high level of analytic sophistication to a more associative approach. Examples of the former are Hayek’s theory of mind and his monetary, business cycle and capital theories; his theory of evolution and social and political philosophy are examples of the latter. Hayek’s economics constitutes a research programme. One of the factors that influenced its further development was Sraffa’s criticism of Hayek’s Prices and Production. In reply to this, Hayek developed his highly sophisticated capital theory and his ideas on neutral money and the international monetary order. I intend to show that the development of Hayek’s economic research programme can only be understood if one takes into account his radically systematic and analytical approach. ADDED COMMENT The paper has “radical ECONOMIST” in the title because I wanted to point out to the audience of the Department of Economics of NYU that the almost generally accepted idea that Hayek’s theory of capital is fatally flawed is wrong. It is one of the (alas!) several red herrings that keep freely swimming in the sea of Hayek research. In the early 1930s Piero Sraffa critized Hayek’s Prices and Production. One of his criticisms was that Hayek had not taken account of the fact that every factor of production has its “own rate of interest.” Hayek took this criticism seriously and with the thoroughness that is characteristic of all his work in all of the various disciplines – at least up till the publication of The Sensory Order in 1952 - set out to solve the problem Sraffa had indicated. That led to a series of articles and eventually The Pure Theory of Capital, in which he had meticulously constructed a highly abstract theory takes into account each productive input's own rate of interest. Hayek showed how entrepreneurial decisions on investment process involve all these own rates. The paper shows that this type of radicalism characterizes the rest of Hayek’s work, too. This more than once became a case of the better being the enemy of the good: because Hayek did not succeed in solving the (often very difficult) problems he had put on his agenda at all, or not in time, he either decided not to publish his attempt to solve it (in the case of his reply to Popper’s criticism of The Sensory Order – see my paper on “How artificial is intelligence in AI?”) or it was too late for the scientific community to take notice (the case of Sraffa’s criticism).
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.