Regional Policies, Key Levers of Regional Innovation Dynamics (original) (raw)

Regional Innovation Dilemmatic Policy-Making:between Misconceptions and Missing Conceptions

Lucrările Seminarului Geografic "Dimitrie Cantemir", 2019

Regions are widely recognised as playing a fundamental role in the promotion of the knowledge economy, but most research has been focusing on diagnosing territorial archetypes, their dynamics peculiarities, as well as their drivers of innovation and innovative performance. Less attention has been paid on establishing a linkage between these theoretical foundations and the design of a policy framework and guidelines to promote regional innovation in a systemic way. Based on a vast theoretical research and on the analysis of empirical evidence, the main objective of this article is precisely to discuss this issue in the light of the mainstream theoretical frameworks that enable a better understanding of the relationship innovation-territory, analysing, also, the main criticisms those approaches are arising among some scholars. This article will present a discussion of the main approaches that constitute the theoretical corpus of the so-called territorial innovation models, pointing out to some of their main ambiguities, misconceptions and conceptual gaps and, lastly, will integrate this reflexion into an alternative framework proposal for a new generation of regional innovation policy.

Territorial innovation models in less developed regions in Europe: the quest for a new research agenda?

European Planning Studies, 2019

Territorial, economic and social cohesion in European Union (EU) regions are major challenges that regional policies are aimed at. These policies have a strong focus on innovation-driven models as key processes for reducing disparities and promoting regional development. Since the 1980s, innovation and technology policies have gained momentum and legitimacy to stimulate multiple development patterns and growth models, mainly from national economic dynamics to well performing regional systems. Theories of knowledge and learning have been developed in more successful places, producing concepts that seem unattainable for less successful ones. Given that less developed regions have been overlooked in innovation studies, this paper reviews the literature on territorial innovation models in Europe in order to understand theoretical and practical gaps for these regions and to identify trends that support the need to redirect conceptual, political and instrumental attention of territorial innovation systems. It debates the different forms of innovation in regions, the variety and role of actors, the quest for geographical and place-based resources, the determinants for innovation and the 'how' and 'for what' demands of regional development. The discussion anticipates critical questions that try to promote a 'normative turn' in innovation policy, propose research avenues and discuss policy implications.

Regional innovation systems: past – present – future

Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation

Since its development in the 1990s, the Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) approach has attracted considerable attention from economic geographers, innovation scholars and policy makers. The RIS approach figures prominently in the scientific discourse about the uneven geography of innovation and the factors that shape the knowledge generation and innovation capacities of regions. The aim of this paper is to reflect about the emergence of the RIS approach, the current debate as well as future challenges. This reflection paper is guided by four overarching research questions: What are the origins and theoretical foundations of this approach? What has the RIS approach contributed to innovation studies and economic geography? What are the implications for innovation policy? And what are the recent lines of research and key research challenges in the future? We argue that the contributions of the RIS approach have been substantial. Still the approach has often been applied in a rather static way, more as a heuristic than a coherent theory. The key challenges for current and future research therefore are to move towards a more theory-based, dynamic perspective on RIS, dealing with new path development and the transformation of RIS.

Introduction: regional innovation systems and regional innovation policies

Regions and Innovation Policies in Europe, 2020

During the last two decades interest in regional innovation policies has progressively increased within the field of regional innovation studies. Such growing interest, which has been mostly European, is observed in the pattern of mentions of the term "regional innovation policy" in scientific papers (González-López et al. 2019). Regional innovation policies studies are narrowly linked to the regional innovation system (RIS) approach (Cooke 1992; Cooke et al. 1997; Asheim and Isaksen 1997; Howells 1999; Asheim and Gertler 2005). The RIS approach, which emerged in the 1990s, linked to both the Innovation Systems (IS) literature and contemporary contributions on Economic Geography and Cluster Theory. The IS approach underlines that nations, regions and sectors show distinctive patterns of innovation, due to diverse technological and institutional trajectories (Lundvall 1992; Edquist 1997). Linked to the post-Schumpeterian views of the Evolutionary School (Nelson and Winter 1982; Dosi and Nelson 1994), innovation and economic changes are understood as a dynamic and path-dependent process, which contributes to explaining why each sector or territory follows different innovation trajectories, shaping different systems of innovation. Moreover, the IS literature draws also on the so-called "interactive learning theories" (Lundvall and Johnson 1994), where innovation is understood as a phenomenon that is the result of multiple interactions and continuous learning processes in which multiple agents participate. At the regional or national level, firms, higher education institutions or technological centres (among others) are the relevant agents that interact and give rise to learning processes and innovations. The other basis for the RIS approach concerns several Economic Geography schools that, particularly since the 1980s, have emphasised the importance of innovation for regions' and territories' competitiveness. Among others, we can include here the New Industrial Districts school

The Multiple Facets of Regional Innovation

2014

Measuring innovation activities involves critical decisions in selecting appropriate indicators and levels of observation. The present article contributes to the literature on this subject by addressing innovation measurement on the regional level. The dimensionality of regional innovation is examined by applying a principal component analysis on seven innovation output indicators in European regions from the Community Innovation Survey and two traditional indicators, i.e. patent applications and R&D expenses. The analysis reveals that regional innovation indeed needs to be regarded as a multidimensional concept involving technological, commercial and service innovation. These distinct innovation activities exhibit clear regional patterns with both technological and service innovation concentrated in highly developed territories and urban areas displaying particularly strong innovation performance in services. In addition, commercially successful innovation appears clustered in back...

Introduction to the Special Issue on Regional Innovation Systems

International Regional Science Review, 2002

International Regional Science Review serves as an international forum for economists, geographers, planners, and other social scientists to share important research findings and methodological breakthroughs. The journal serves as a catalyst for improving spatial and regional analysis within the social sciences and stimulating communication among the disciplines. IRSR deliberately helps define regional science by publishing key interdisciplinary survey articles that summarize and evaluate previous research and identify fruitful research directions. Focusing on issues of theory, method, and public policy where the spatial or regional dimension is central, IRSR strives to promote useful scholarly research that is securely tied to the real world.

Rethinking Regional Innovation

2004

: Since the principle that the capacity for innovation is a driving force in the growth of firms or other productive systems has been acknowledged, public policies hold to the view that geographical proximity plays a part in the process of the circulation of technology and knowledge, by fostering the kind of face to face relationships needed to establish and maintain a common pool of knowledge. The aim of this article is to question the relevance of these ideas, and enquiring as to whether geographical proximity is really needed for the diffusion and exchange of knowledge. A body of literature (local systems of production and externalities) considers permanent geographical proximity as a necessary condition for the diffusion of knowledge (I) whereas the articles dealing with transmission channels for externalities, show that geographical proximity only influences the innovative performance of firms if there is effective interaction between the agents (II). We show that organisation ...

Regional innovation systems in EU-25. Towards a typology based on economic development and innovation

regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk

This paper depicts a typology of regions, capturing the diversity of regional innovation systems across the EU-25. Following the Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) literature, our research selects 21 variables related to the ability of a region to generate and absorb knowledge, and its capacity to transform R&D into innovation and economic growth. Based on the results of principal components and cluster analyses, we identify seven types of regional innovation system where the 186 regions group together according to their sectoral specialisation, technological and economic capacity, and performance. For each group a number of policy recommendations are suggested, contingent to their local-specific characteristics. Moreover, the paper allows us to identify similar and more advanced regions so as to facilitate comparisons and benchmarking between homogeneous regions, thus enabling more accurate policy learning. In short the contribution of this paper is twofold. In the first place it provides the first RIS typology for the EU-25 regions completed using a large number of variables. Secondly, the conclusions obtained from the analysis may be used to lead policymakers' actions in the field of regional innovation policy in the EU.

Do regional systems of innovation matter?

Routledge eBooks, 2005

The paper deals with the significant impact of location on innovation activity that has been found in many empirical studies. Main elements of such an explanation are the specific problems of a division of innovative labor. Based on an outline of these issues the concept of a regional innovation system is presented in some detail and an overview of results from recent research on regional innovation systems is given. The paper then discusses basic policy options and names a number of important questions for further research.