Euphemising Forest Diversion? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Can deforestation help rebuild forests ?
2016
Until the nineteenth century and before the Industrial Revolution and the start of modem agricultural development the rural landscape in Europe centred on three components: fields and pasture; forests producing large amounts of wood and managed by the feudal, royal and then governmental forestry authorities; and small woods or domestic forests, defined by and centred on agricultural practices. Along with three-year rotation and fodder crops, this trinal system has disappeared from modem landscapes, to be replaced by a bipolar forest-agriculture structure. This bipolar structure is reflected in most interpretations of tropical forests, in which the landscape is often seen as a binary system: on the one hand there is the forest a closed, impenetrable, wild area and on the other agriculture, which is open, domestic, civilized, and dominated by 'crops'. As a result, it is not surprising then that we find it difficult to interpret areas that have been affected by smallholder prac...
2020
Restoring forest landscapes is critical in the face of continued global forest loss and degradation. In this article, we explore some challenges underlying the delivery of global commitments to restore forest landscapes. We propose that three fundamental questions need to be resolved upfront for the effective implementation of Forest Landscape Restoration and related commitments: (1) What social and ecological landscape objectives are being sought through Forest Landscape Restoration? (2) How are specific areas being selected for restoration? (3) How is success measured when restoring forest landscapes? We believe that there is an urgent need to adequately answer these questions to successfully implement political commitments for large-scale forest restoration.