Placing curriculum and pedagogy within an ecological worldview (original) (raw)
Abstract
Surveying the last two centuries, one might easily deduce the purpose of education has been to induct, or rather indoctrinate, students into a culture’s dominant ontology and epistemology. In modern Western culture’s prevailing education systems, this usually means atomistic, dualistic, and competitive ways of being and disembodied, decontextualized and dispassionate ways of knowing that focus on passively acquiring abstracted and fragmented knowledge. Given our current predicament of human alienation and ecological crisis, we suggest a new worldview is needed to reconceptualize human ways of living and being in, indeed valuing, our place within the ecosphere. In contrast to the modernist, mechanistic world view, which deems the natural world detached, valueless, and available for human exploitation, an ecological worldview advocates a human sense of self as interconnected and unified with the natural world. Moved by the work of philosophers, eco-theorists and eco-educators, this paper explores the role of the more-than-human world in pedagogical and curricular processes and practices that align more closely with an ecological worldview. Our proposed praxis of ecological education was introduced and put into action with a group of educators at the Education With/Out Borders (EWOB) symposium at Sasamat, British Columbia, in October, 2008. An overview of the exercise and highlights from the group’s concluding discussion of the experience are also
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (29)
- Abram, D. (1990). Animal thinking. The Trumpeter, 7(4). Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/476/796
- Abram, D. (1997). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more than human world. New York: Random House.
- Bai, H. (in press). Re-animating the universe: Environmental education and philosophical animism. In M. McKenzie, H. Bai, P. Hart, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Re-imagining education. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
- Berry, T. (1993). The meadow across the creek. In T. Berry, The great work: Our way into the future. Retrieved July 2, 2008, from http://www.thomasberry.org/Essays/MeadowAcrossCreek.html
- Berry, W. (2008). Faustian economics: Hell hath no limits. Harper's Magazine. May. Retrieved June 29, 2008, from http://harpers.org/archive/2008/05/0082022
- Bookchin, M. (1991). The ecology of freedom: The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
- Buber, M. (1996). I and thou. (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Touchstone. (Original work published 1970.)
- Callicott, J. Baird. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Clark, M. (2002). In search of human nature. London: Routledge.
- Coppola, F. (Producer), & Reggio, G. (Director). (1982). Koyaanisqatsi [Motion picture]. USA: Island Entertainment/Palm Pictures.
- Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Layton, UT: Gibbs M. Smith.
- Evernden, N. (1993). The natural alien: Humankind and environment (2 nd ed.). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
- Fromm, E. (1955). The sane society. New York: Rinehart.
- Gruenewald, D. (2003). A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational research Journal, 40(3), 619-654.
- Leopold, A. (1966). A sand county almanac. New York: Ballantine.
- Merchant, C. (2005). Radical ecology: The search for a livable world. New York: Routledge.
- Morito, B. (2002). Thinking ecologically: Environmental thought, values and policy. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
- Naess, A. (1987). Self-realization: An ecological approach to being in the world. The Trumpeter, 4(3), 35- 42.
- Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. (D. Rothenberg, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Naugle, D. K. (2002). Worldview: The history of a concept. Cambridge, UK: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
- Orr, D. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
- Rorty, A. (1998). The ruling history of education. In. A. Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), Philosophers on education: New historical perspectives (pp. 1-13). London: Routledge.
- Roszak, T. (1993). Awakening the ecological unconscious. In Context: A Quarterly of Humane Sustainable Culture, 34, 48-51. Retrieved June 12, 2008, from http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC34/Roszak.htm
- Rowe, S. (1991). Education for a new world view. The Trumpeter, 8(3).
- Sale, K. (1985). Dwellers in the land: The bioregional vision. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books. Skolimowski, H. (2005). Philosophy for a new civilization. New Delhi: Gyan.
- Shepard, P. (1982). Nature and madness. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
- Sobel, D. (2008). Childhood and nature: Design principles for educators. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
- Tucker, M. E. (n.d.). Thomas Berry and the new story [PDF document]. Retrieved from Lecture Notes Online Web Site: http://www.earth-community.org/images/TuckerEssay.pdf
- White Jr., L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155, 1203-1207.