Roads Diverge: Long-Term Patterns of Relapse, Recidivism and Desistance for a Cohort of Drug-Involved Offenders (original) (raw)

Abstract

Research indicates that a large percentage of inmates released from prison back into their communities will be rearrested. Particularly vulnerable are those who have past histories of drug addiction. Except for intensive experiences with long term aftercare programming, there appears to be very few programs that significantly increase the probability of (re)integrative success for ex-offenders attempting to become conforming members of society. Other evaluation studies examining the efficacy of particular programs in reducing recidivism and drug use (NIDA, 2012, Pendergast, 2009) have been promising, however, we still know very little about the underlying mechanisms that produce change in offending patterns. Unlike evaluation studies examining the efficacy of particular programs, the primary goal of this project was to increase our understanding about the mechanisms and processes of desistance from crime and drug use among current urban, largely minority and increasingly female criminal offenders. Using a mixed methods research design, this research follows former drug-involved offenders for over 20 years post release from prison. The project was guided by Paternoster and Bushway’s identity theory of desistance (2009), which relies on the concept of identity that is theorized to provide direction for an individual’s behavior. The identity theory of desistance emphasizes the individual identity as reflexive, interpretive, and as such, premised on human agency. METHODS The project features a multi-method design and unfolded in two phases. The sample for this study originated from a previous sample used to evaluate the efficacy of Therapeutic Communities (TC) in reducing recidivism and relapse for drug involved offenders in 1989. In Phase I of the present study, official arrest records were obtained for the original 1,250 offenders through 2008 from both official Delaware and NCIC data sources. From these data, race and gender specific offending trajectory models were estimated. In Phase II used the trajectories as a sampling frame to select 304 respondents for in-depth interviews. The goal of the interviews was to examine the processes and mechanisms that led to persistence or desistance from crime and drugs. MAJOR FINDINGS The NCIC data uncovered an average of 2 more arrests for cohort members compared to the Delaware data. However, the trajectory models that resulted from both sources of arrest data were essentially the same, with trajectory group membership across both data sources identical in over 95% of the cases. For the total sample, a five trajectory group model fit the data best, with three groups differentially increasing their rate of offending and then leveling off to near zero, and an additional two groups increasing at different rates but remaining more criminally active throughout the time period compared to the desisting groups. Supporting the identity theory of desistance, interviews revealed that the vast majority of offenders who had successfully desisted from both crime and drug use first transformed their “offender identity” into a “non-offender working identity.” This was true for both race and gender groups interviewed. This cognitive process was typically motivated by respondents realizing that if change did not occur, they would likely become what they feared, either dying an addict, dying in prison, dying alone, or some other horrible fate. To behaviorally conform to their new “non-offender” identity, respondents used various tools including changing their “people and places” by seeking out noncriminal ties and staying away from locations that triggered their drug use or criminal behavior. Although treatment usually did not result in immediate desistance for most, the vast majority who eventually “got clean” relied on the tools learned in treatment programs when they were ready to use them. Religion also was cited as a tool by many that was used to establish pro-social support networks that reinforced their new identities. Contrary to life-course theory, partnership and parenthood did not appear to be “turning points” for the majority of our respondents. However, when they were ready to get clean, rekindling relationships with adult children or grandchildren was an extremely important factor for many of our respondents. Similarly, while getting a good job upon release did not deter the majority of addicts from relapse upon release from prison, it is clear that finding stable employment that paid a living wage is extremely difficult for this sample of drug involved offenders and that deciding to get clean and/or maintaining a “non-offender” identity is more difficult when access to a meaningful quality of employment is beyond reach or nonexistent.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (81)

  1. Martin, S. S., O'Connell, D. J., Paternoster, R., & Bachman, R. (2011). The long and winding road to desistance from crime for drug-involved offenders: The long-term influence of TC treatment on re-arrest. Journal of Drug Issues, 41(2), 179-196.
  2. Ronet Bachman, Erin Kerrison, Daniel O'Connell, Raymond Paternoster, and Lionel Smith. An Identity Theory of Desistance: Long-term Patterns of Relapse and Recidivism for a Cohort of Drug-Involved Offenders. Submitted to the American Journal of Sociology. Conference Presentations American Society of Criminology: Washington, DC, November 2011
  3. Ronet Bachman, "Roads Diverge: Preliminary Findings from a Long-term Study of Drug- Involved Offenders."
  4. Erin Kerrison: "What's Good For The Goose May Not be Good for the Gander: Reconciling Identity and Survival Amid the Reentry Effort."
  5. Daniel O'Connell, Raymond Paternoster, and Steven Martin. "Finding the Right Road: Examining the Component Effects of Transitional Substance Abuse Treatment on Long Term Patterns of Offending. American Society of Criminology: Chicago, November 2012
  6. Ronet Bachman and Raymond Paternoster, "Testing the Identity Theory of Desistance: Findings from a Long-term Study of Drug-Involved Offenders."
  7. Erin Kerrison, "Second-Chance Grandparenting: How an (Un)Conventional Role May Impact the Desistance Process."
  8. Daniel O'Connell, "When Desistance Isn't Desistance: Low Level Offending and Self-Harm Reduction." Lionel Smith, "The Impact of Changes in Illicit Drug Markets on Drug Use and Criminal Activity and Desistance."
  9. Erin Kerrison, "Second-Chance Grandparenting: How an (Un)Conventional Role May Impact the Desistance Process." Scheduled for the 2013 American Society of Criminology Meeting, Atlanta, November 2013
  10. Erin Kerrison, Lionel Smith, and Ronet Bachman, "Parenthood and Desistance: A Mixed Methods Analysis. DISSEMINATION OF RESESRACH FINDINGS
  11. Agnew, R. (2006). Storylines as a neglected cause of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(2), 119-147.
  12. Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta- analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369-404.
  13. Anglin, M. Douglas, Barry S. Brown, Richard Dembo, and Carl Leukelfeld. 2009. "Criminality and addiction: Selected issues for future policies, practice and research." Journal of Drug Issues 39 (1): 89-100.
  14. Bachman, R., & Schutt, R. (2013). The practice of research in criminology and criminal justice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  16. Baumeister, R. F. (1994). The crystallizaiton of discontent. In T. F. Heatherton, & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 281-297). Washington, DC: American Psychoilogical Association.
  17. Bazeley, P. (2010). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  18. Belli, R. F., Stafford, F. P., & Alwin, D. F. (2009). Calendar and time diary: Methods in life course research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  19. Belli, R. F., Shay, W. L., & Stafford, F. P. (2001). Event history calendars and question list surveys: A direct comparison of interviewing methods. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(1), 45-74.
  20. Biernacki, P. (1986). Pathways From Heroin Addiction: Recovery Without Treatment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  21. Bloom, B., Owen, B., Deschenes, E.P., & Rosenbaum, J. (2002). Moving toward justice for female juvenile offenders in the new millennium: Modeling gender-specific policies and programs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(1), 37-56.
  22. Bravo, M. J., Royuela, L., Barrio, G., de la Fuente, L., Suarez, M., & Brugal, M. T. (2007). More free syringes, fewer drug injectors in the case of Spain. Social Science & Medicine, 65(8), 1773-1778.
  23. Burke, P.J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18-29.
  24. Butzin, C. A., O'Connell, D. J., Martin, S. S., & Inciardi, J. A. (2006). Effect of drug treatment during work release on new arrests & incarcerations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(5), 557-565.
  25. Caspi, A., & Herbener, E.S. (1990). Continuity and change: Assortative marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 250-258.
  26. Chesney-Lind, M. & Pasko, L. (2013). Girls, Women, and Crime: Selected Readings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  27. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribners.
  28. Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. National Institutes of Health.
  29. Deschenes, E. P., Owen, B., & Crow, J. (2007). Recidivism among female prisoners: Secondary analysis of the 1994 BJS recidivism data set. No. 216950. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  30. Dorsey, T. L., & Zawitz, M. W. (2005). Drugs and crime facts No. NCJ 165148. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  31. Elder, G. H., & Social Science Research Council (U.S.). (1985). Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968-1980.
  32. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990- 1064.
  33. Giordano, P. C., Schroeder, R. D., & Cernkovich, S. A. (2007). Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1603-1661.
  34. Glasner, T., & van der Vaart, W. (2009). Applications of calendar instruments in social surveys: A review. Quality and Quantity, 43(3), 333-349.
  35. Glueck, S. & Glueck, E. (1950) Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Commonwealth Fund.
  36. Granovetter, M.S. (1995). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  37. Granovetter, M. S. (2000). The strength of weak ties. [La fuerza de los vinculos debiles] Politica y Sociedad, (33), 41-56.
  38. Hagan, J. (1993). The social embeddedness of crime and unemployment. Criminology, 31, 465- 491.
  39. Harrison, L. D. (2001). The revolving prison door for drug-involved offenders: Challenges and opportunities. Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 462-485.
  40. Holzer, H. (1996). What Employers Want: Job Prospects for Less-Educated Workers. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  41. Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra- individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 655-673.
  42. Inciardi, J. A., & Harrison, L. D. (Eds.). (2000). Harm reduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  43. Inciardi, James A., Steven S. Martin, and Clifford A. Butzin. 2004. "Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison." Crime and Delinqunecy 50(1): 88-107.
  44. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
  45. Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2007). Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociological Methods & Research, 35(4), 542-571.
  46. Jones, B. L., Nagin, D. S., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods and Research, 29(3), 374-393.
  47. Krueger, R.F., Moffitt, T.E., Avashalom, C., Bleske, A., & Silva, P.A. (1998). Assortative mating for antisocial behavior: Developmental and methodological implications. Behavior Genetics, 28, 178-186.
  48. Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 No. NCJ 193427). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  49. Lattimore, P. K., & Visher, C. A. (2010). The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Summary and synthesis No. 230421). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  50. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  51. Lipsey, Mark W., Nana A. Landenberger, and Sandra J. Wilson. 2007. Effects of Cognitive- Behavioral Programs for Criminal Offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews.
  52. Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible Selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
  53. Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1987). Possible selves: The interface between motivation and the self- concept.
  54. In K. Yardles and T. Homess (Eds.) Self and Identity: Psychological Perspectives. New York: Wiley.
  55. Martin, S. S., O'Connell, D. J., Paternoster, R., & Bachman, R. (2011). The long and winding road to desistance from crime for drug-involved offenders: The long-term influence of TC treatment on re-arrest. Journal of Drug Issues, 41(2), 179-196.
  56. Mare, R.D. (1991). Five decades of educational assertive mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15-32.
  57. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives (First ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  58. Maruna, Shadd and Kevin Roy. 2007. "Amputation or reconstruction? Notes on the concept of "knifing off" and desistance from crime." Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 23:104-124.
  59. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  60. Miller, S. L. (2011). After the crime: The power of restorative justice dialogues between victims and violent offenders. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  61. Nagin, Daniel S. 2005. Group-Based Modeling of Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  62. Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology, 32(4), 581-606.
  63. Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (2000). Population heterogeneity and state dependence: State of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(2), 117-144.
  64. National Institutes on Drug Abuse (2012). Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations: A Research-Based Guide. National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  65. O'Connell, D.J. (2006). Prisoner Reentry and the Life Course. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing. Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2011). National drug control budget, FY 2012. Retrieved December, 27, http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/policy-and- research/fy12highlight_exec_sum.pdf
  66. Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100: 765-824.
  67. Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the "feared self": Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103- 1156.
  68. Pendergast, M.L. (2009). Interventions to promote successful re-entry among drug-abusing parolees. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 5(1), 4-12.
  69. Pew Center on States. (2011). State of recidivism: The revolving door of America's prisons. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
  70. Prochshaska, J.O. & DiClemente, C.C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390-395.
  71. Robbins, C. A., Martin, S. S., & Surratt, H. L. (2009). Substance abuse treatment, anticipated maternal roles, and reentry success of drug-involved women prisoners. Crime & Delinquency, 55(3), 388-411.
  72. Rhule-Louie, D. & McMahon, R.J. (2007). Problem behavior and romantic relationships: Assortative mating, behavior contagion, and desistance. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 20, 53-100.
  73. Sanders, C.B. & Cuneo, J.J. (2010). Social reliability in qualitative team research. Sociology, 44(2), 325-343.
  74. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
  75. Snyder, H. N. (1990). Growth in minority detentions attributed to drug law violators: 1990. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention.
  76. Sprecher, S. (1998). Insiders' perspective on reasons for attraction to a close other. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 287-300.
  77. Stafford, F. P. (2009). Emerging modes of timeline data collection: Event history calendar time diary and methods. Social Indicators Research, 93(1), 69-76.
  78. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  79. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin cummings.
  80. Sutton, J. E. (2010). A review of the life-events calendar method for criminological research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1038-1044.
  81. West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009 No. NCJ 231675. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.