E Koleth, ‘Temporary migration – stranger politics for a transient time’, Strangers, Aliens and Foreigners Global Conference, Oxford, United Kingdom, 21 – 23 September 2012. (original) (raw)
Related papers
When good neighbours become good friends: The Australian embrace of its millionth migrant
Australian Historical Studies, 2004
The arrival of Australia's 'millionth' post-Second World War migrant in 1955 provided the occasion for a nationally choreographed embrace of a young British woman posed as both culmination and promise for an immigrant nation. This article traces various treatments of this event and explores the transitional national, political and cultural narratives produced and negotiated. It examines the ways in which the story of the millionth migrant was taken up as a matter of national interest in Australia and reveals how the British migrants the nation apparently embraced were processed and deployed as salves for anxiety about national identity and in the development of notions of Australian community. It argues that for many British migrants, this process was often fraught: assumed to be willing, welcome and easily assimilated, their identity as migrants was too often smothered by an embrace that ignored broader migratory experiences. At her last dinner aboard the Oronsay, Mrs Barbara Porritt confessed to the ship's Captain that she was worried about her future. The 21-year-old from Yorkshire was about to begin a whirlwind week of official engagements as Australia's designated 'millionth postwar migrant'. Though accompanied by the husband who had convinced her that 'Australia offers you everything', Mrs Porritt appreciated the reassurance of the Captain at what had been planned as a dinner of welcome. 'Gallantly', Captain Burnand 'put her mind at ease' by putting his arm around her and planting a kiss on her cheek. Australian Minister for Immigration, Harold Holt, who was also at the dinner, immediately leapt to his feet and shook the Captain's hand, congratulating him for 'doing what everyone else had wanted to do to her as soon as they saw her'. 1 T H I S I S B U T O N E episode among popular accounts of the arrival in 1955 of British migrant Mrs Barbara Porritt. 2 These are stories that have been told many times: conscripted as Australia's 'millionth' postwar migrant, Mrs Porritt's photogenic face featured prominently in many magazines and newspapers as both culmination and promise for an immigrant nation. Posed as the central figure in 'Our millionth' Nowhere was Mrs Porritt more warmly embraced than in the Good Neighbour, the monthly bulletin issued by the Australian Department of Immigration. The paper
Towards sanctuary: securing refugees and forced migrants in multicultural Australia
Cultures in Refuge: Seeking Sanctuary in Modern Australia, 2012
The notion of sanctuary has been an integral part of the history of Europeans’ presence in Australia, since the earliest interactions between Aboriginal inhabitants and Dutch sailors lost near the western coast. Throughout the nineteenth century, new arrivals (whether convicts, free settlers or participants in organised migration schemes) continued to arrive with the hope that Australia would offer them economic opportunity and safety. Indeed, whilst Europeans forcibly displaced Australia’s Indigenous population, the white colonies came to reimagine themselves as one part of global network of settler societies that offered new opportunity to fashion a more just world. The notion of whiteness that underpinned the settlers, and their hope to develop so-called ‘virgin territory’, was fragile and defensive. From its earliest discovery by Europeans, Australia has been contested land. Whilst Great Britain’s claim became internationally accepted, many in Australia remained conscious of potential threats from other European empires. More pressing still was the sense of isolation as a British outpost that was worryingly close to the Asian territories to the continent’s north. Fearful of irrational and violent ‘Asian hordes’, Europeans in Australia became convinced of the need to increase the population in order to develop the nation economically. Thus, from the nation’s earliest European presence, there was a tension between the characterisation of new arrivals as human equals to be welcomed into the community, and arrivals’ portrayal as economic units that were required to secure and develop the nation.
Invaders, Illegals and Aliens: Imagining Exclusion in a White Australia
Law Text Culture, 2003
Ghassan Hage argues that the three Howard governments, from 1996-2003, have seen the re-centring of an old form of paranoid nationalism (2003: 4). The discussants in the 1901 parliament are in the process of producing this form of nationalism. In 2001, Howard argued that it ...
Uncertain lives: Migration, the border and neoliberalism in Australia
Social Identities: Journal for the Study of …, 2009
Over the last twenty years or so there has been a greatly increased anxiety in Australia over those people now often identified as asylum seekers. In this article I argue that this change of attitude is connected with the ongoing reconstruction of Australia as a neoliberal state. I link the importance of the border of the nationstate with the development of capitalism and go on to argue that there is a direct relation between the assumptions of neoliberalism and Giorgio Agamben's theorization of the state of exception. With this argument I suggest that the state of exception is fundamentally raced. I discuss the Australian relationship between migrants, race and capitalism, which historically worked in terms of the White Australia policy, and think about how asylum seekers are understood to threaten the racialized, neoliberal order of Australian capitalism.
The state and the welfare of immigrants in Australia
Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1989
Post-war immigration to Australia has been accompanied by two processes associated with the development of Australian capitalism -the urbanisation process and the "proletarianisation" of the immigrant population. These processes brought with them major social problems and the potential for social conflict. The welfare system provided a means to control the immigrant population, which failed to assimilate effectively into Australian society, as had been expected by the immigration planners of the 1940s. The government policies shifted from "assimilationism", to "integrationism" and then on to "multiculturalism" and most recently, "mainstreaming". In each case the basic economic contradictions of Australian society provide the context for welfare policies directed towards ethnic minorities.
The figure of the temporary migrant is one which puts into question the forms through which public sphere sensibilities on mobility, belonging and sociality are forged. This article argues that the temporary migrant can be a site of anxiety resulting from the perceived complexity of flows of mobility in a trans- and/or post-national context in which migration is not necessarily always permanent, social mobility does not occur within the site of the nation, and close kinship networks may be spread across multiple regions of the globe. The article investigates the 2012 case of politician Teresa Gambaro’s claims that temporary migrants in Australia on 457 visas required hygiene training, including the wearing of deodorant in order to integrate into the national community. The question raised by these statements is why permanent migrants bodily, food and other cultural practices are more readily incorporated into Australian liberalmulticulturalism, while temporary migrants’ bodies are made a site for practices of shaming. It is argued that a ‘networked’ understanding of mobility rather than a migrational, transnational or globalizational perspective opens opportunities for a more ethical response to temporary migrants co-habiting as temporary members of a (national) population.
"This article examines the ‘vision splendid’ that existed for Australian migration following World War II. That vision (championed by the then Minister for Immigration, Arthur Calwell) was myopic, but is still pertinent to current debates on Australian Migration, particularly in the way that migrants were placed in categories of the desirable. This paper uses a particular migrant group, the Temple Society (Tempelgesellschaft, also known as the Templers) to illustrate the concerns of 1940s immigration policy. This group had a number of colonies in the British Mandate of Palestine, but were interned in Australia during World War II and underwent postwar investigations by the then newly formed Department of Immigration."
Australian Multiculturalism: Revisiting Australia’s Political Heritage and the Migrant Presence
History Compass, 2010
Australian multiculturalism has become central to the nation's political landscape, yet historians have rarely considered the impact of government policies on migrants' pre-existing political identities. Multiculturalism became government policy in 1973, in recognition of the new complexity of Australian society that followed greatly increased postwar immigration. The new policy sought to facilitate migrants' inclusion in Australian society, without obliging them to surrender their cultural heritage. Similarly to the government's emphasis on ethnic identity, historians have displayed sustained interest in ethnic heritage, rather than on migrants' political belief. New research in transnational histories and social memory studies provide renewed potential to evaluate the processes through which migrants' political and moral ideals have been transferred to Australia. Memories of social norms and cultural landscapes existed in a dialogue with migrants' everyday Australian experiences, helping to frame their engagement with broader society. The closer integration of multicultural studies with transnational research and memory studies offers new perspectives of Australian history, and a deeper understanding of migrants' engagement in multicultural Australia. Colonial governments in nineteenth century Australia had sought to establish a vibrant British culture in the antipodes, and placed great emphasis on public adherence to British norms of behaviour. The importance placed on British culture was strengthened from 1901, when Australian Federation heralded the creation of the White Australia Policy. Non-white immigrants were henceforth barred from settling in Australia, and many non-white residents were deported. As a result of heightened racial awareness, even southern Europeans found themselves marginalised in Australia's Anglicised public space. Although Australia's population increased rapidly from approximately 3,770,000 in 1901 to 6,929,000 in 1939, only 5.95% of its residents were non-European on the outbreak of the Second World War. 1 Following the Second World War, government policy shifted markedly in order to increase the rate of immigration and population growth. Initially, the government targeted northern Europe's population of Displaced Persons (DPs), whom it hoped were both ethnically suitable and hostile to communism. Although a preference remained for British settlers, the range of donor countries