Borderwork: Finnish-Russian co-operation and civil society engagement in the social economy of transformation (original) (raw)
Related papers
This study examines the actual and potential role of Finnish civil society organizations in developing new forms of cross-border cooperation with Russia. It puts forth the concept of civic neighborhood as a bottom-up alternative to the official notion of ‘EUropean’ Neighborhood. As the period to be analyzed begins with the collapse of the Soviet Union, it covers the era during which Finnish-Russian bilateral relations became a part of broader EU-Russia relations. The formation of civic neighborhood is studied on the basis of two major empirical primary datasets, of which one consists of interviews and another one of published newspaper materials. The two datasets provide different, yet mutually complementary perspectives on the phenomenon under study. It is vital to study both perspectives as perceptions, since images of the other and discursive relations are not mere results of cooperation practices but also – and more importantly – their prerequisites. The optimal way to normalize neighborly relations is to increase people-to-people interaction, and preferably this ought to occur from the bottom up rather than the top down. While state institutions and structures may contribute to the shaping of the general operational environment, the maintenance of civil society cooperation cannot be expected to rest entirely on the state. In light of the current trends that reduce the funds allotted for cross-border cooperation on the one hand, and the decentralization and privatization of public services on the other hand, it would be fruitful to conceptualize a cross-border space for social contracting and entrepreneurship through civil society organizations. This would allow the civil society organizations to gain further leverage to fill in the gaps created by borders and bordering, and to bridge the apparent intersectoral crevasses
Finland’s action to strengthen civil societies and advance their enabling environment
Publications of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, 2022
The strengthening of civil societies is an important goal in Finland’s development policy and a means to achieve other development policy goals. Supporting civil societies is important in the current world political situation, where civic spaces are shrinking and autocratization is on the rise. This commissioned study for the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland (MFA) examines the strengthening of civil societies and advancing their enabling environment in Finland’s development policy and cooperation. It focuses on the implementation of the MFA Guidelines for Civil Society in Development Policy (2017) across Finnish development policy sectors. The study is based on document reviews and interviews. Additionally, an online participatory workshop with multi-sectoral stakeholders was organized. The results indicate that the strengthening of civil societies is perceived as very important across Finnish development policy sectors, and its emphasis has increased. Finnish development policy and cooperation supports civil societies through multiple funding instruments. However, much of this work remains invisible, and the overall perception regarding civil society support relates to the MFA support to Finnish CSOs. To respond to world political challenges, Finland should develop a more strategic and political approach in its support for civil societies and their enabling environments.
Journal of European Integration, 2010
This article focuses on the development of Russian discourses of civil society in academic and political contexts since 1991. In this discussion, the influence of changing Russian discourses and understandings of state–society relationships on the development of voluntary organizations (civil society organizations or CSOs) will be analysed. As this article demonstrates, the direct influence of the European Union and other international actors on Russian civil society has waned with the strengthening of Russian policies of nation‐building and consolidation but remains a powerful background force. However, this study also provides evidence for more subtle forms of ‘Europeanization’ of civil society agendas, primarily through, but not limited to, pragmatic cooperation with EU partners. The most important area where this has taken place is in the definition of social agendas which have been neglected in Russia’s post‐Soviet transformation.
2019 Report on the State of Civil Society in the EU and Russia
2019 Report on the State of Civil Society in the EU and Russia , 2020
From 2016 onwards, the EU-Russia Civil Society Forum (CSF) has issued an annual Report on the State of Civil Society in the EU and Russia. Each year we study four EU countries and Russia, outline the main trends and challenges for civil society organisations (CSOs) there, solutions to those challenges and legal and political conditions. For 2019, we have chosen Sweden, which has a long history of social democracy and joined the EU in 1995, the UK, an “old” member state, which is going through Brexit at the time of writing, and Estonia and Slovakia, two “new” member states which were in the former Soviet sphere of influence and joined the EU in 2004. For their research, all country authors used available official data, interviewed representatives from between 12 to 16 CSOs and, apart from the UK, conducted a focus group to verify the findings and conclusions.
From public services to networks of social enterprises. Strategic trends for South-Eastern Europe
The evolution from public services to networks of social enterprises, not integrated into administrative convergence, expresses the essence of a process of institutional restructuring and reconversion based on common directions above mentioned and determined by the impact of Collaborative Public Management on Collaborative Governance. The above evolution has endemic characteristics for various European regions, in this context for SouthEastern Europe. The current paper aims to emphasise specific trends for SouthEastern European states within the construction and operationalisation of a social enterprise network system, as well as lessons from relevant models for the social enterprises, such as the American, European model. The paper achieves brief presentation of the state of the art concerning the social enterprises in some SouthEastern European states:
Challenges for Civil Society: Participation in the Baltic States Region Building
Public Policy and Administration, 2008
This article addresses the question of how the emergence and development of NGOs differ in respect to their environmental form in different Baltic states. Attempting to do this, the research looks at three important aspects related to third sector building and performance in the Baltic States. Firstly, the article describes the main political features and roles of the civil society in the development of democracy by using collective action theory. Secondly, it analyzes the conditions for the emergence of NGOs in contemporary Baltic countries, while involving the theory of region building and theory of P. Joenniemi about the emergence of NGOs. The article considers a few periods: before 1991 and after till 2006, while dividing it into four periods before 1991, and 1991-1997, 1998-2003, 2004-2006. The following helps to identify the peculiarities more objectively and assess broader results of participation while adapting collective action theory. As a result, the article assumes that ...