Multilayered ethics in research involving unaccompanied refugee minors (original) (raw)
Related papers
Ethical problems in refugee research
Much public health and social science research with refugee participants is conducted with inadequate reflection on the ethical difficulties posed by such research. These problems range from the formulation of a research question and categorisation of participants through to informed consent and recruitment processes, data collection and communication of findings. These problems may stem from na¨ıve approaches to defining refugees, defining communities or accounting for vulnerability. This na¨ıvet´e may result in findings that are too general, unrepresentative or misleading. It may impose undue burdens or risks on participants without benefiting the participants or contributing to understanding of the research question. In this paper I examine some of these conceptual problems and their consequences for research, and suggest some precautions that can be taken to minimise these problems.
Involving refugee children in research: emerging ethical and positioning issues
European Early Childhood Education Research Journal
This paper discusses some of the ethical issues encountered when involving refugee children in research. It draws on a study that aims to investigate how young Syrian refugee children experience Early Education, in one English local authority. This small-scale qualitative piece of research was developed in response to the deepening refugee crisis outlined by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in August 2013 which suggested that as a result of the conflict in Syria, 740,000 refugees were under the age of 11. The study involves four children and their familieswho were resettled in England through the Syrian Vulnerable Person Resettlement scheme (2017). Also involved are four Early Childhood and Education Care settings. The research field is complex and the 'customised methods and methodologies' which have been adopted, to respond well to the challenges of the field, are described. Ethical issues concerning the conceptualisation of refugees, a narrative of trauma and location of positionality are expanded. The researcher has developed power-sensitive ethical research practices to help manage issues of positionality; negotiate access in the field; develop authentic relationships; address issues of cultural bias in self and others, and navigate the challenges of researching with very young refugee children.
The Ethical Implications of the Researcher's Dominant Position in Cross-Cultural Refugee Research
This chapter aims to explore the role of the criminology researcher who seeks to conduct qualitative and ethical research with refugees in crisis condition. It is argued that the researcher already promotes, albeit in an implicit manner, an ethical agenda aimed at minimising potential harm and protecting individual rights at a macro level. In this, there is an attempt at re-shaping the narrative of deviance imposed by those in power on powerless and voiceless asylum seekers. And yet, the same researcher is in a dominant position at a micro-level, while conducting research directly with the research subject.
When 'Do No Harm' Is Not Enough: The Ethics of Research with Refugees and Other Vulnerable Groups
British Journal of Social Work, 2011
Ethics in social work research increasingly recognises that the rights and interests of subjects must be primary. The principal aim is to ensure that the subjects of research are protected from harm that might result from their participation in the research. In this article, research ethics are examined in the context of refugees and other vulnerable groups. It is argued that the ancient idea of seeking to 'do no harm' that continues to be a key principle in the refugee field, while necessary, is insufficient to ensure ethically sound research practice. A more sophisticated approach is required in research with such groups in order to ensure that social work's ethical responsibilities are realised. This article discusses a model of participatory research as a vehicle for developing research ethics in social work.
'Documenting Displacement: Questioning Methodological Boundaries in Forced Migration Research' (ed. Grabska, K. & Clark-Kazak, C.), 2022
According to recent figures, more than half of the roughly seventy million people living in a situation of forced migration around the globe are under the age of eighteen (unhcr 2019, 3). This includes children who have been internally displaced as well as those who have fled across national borders in search of sanctuary. It also includes the thousands born each year in the world's many displacement camps, often to parents who grew up in the same location. Failure to attend to the perspectives of children in situations of displacement weakens our understanding of forced migration. In both ethical and intellectual terms, this is as unacceptable as ignoring the experience of say, adult women, or the elderly. At the same time, the fields of childhood studies and children's rights must pay attention to the perspectives of young forced migrants in order to move beyond normative assumptions about the role of the state-assumptions reinforced by research with child citizens, who are rarely identified as such (Boyden and Hart 2007). Recognizing the value of investigating children's experiences of forced migration leads to consideration of the approach to such inquiry, in terms of both methodology and ethics. In this chapter, my aim is not to provide a comprehensive guide to the issues surrounding research with children in situations of forced migration. That would require a far lengthier discussion than is possible here. Rather, I intend to offer prompts for reflection when considering how best to conduct research with children in such situations. These are organized around the themes of positionality, specificity, and power.
Conflict and Health
Research within conflict settings challenges the ethical assumptions of traditional research practice. The tensions between theory and practice were evident in a study of working children among Syrian refugee communities in Lebanon. While the study sought to introduce scientific evidence that might support effective policy solutions, its implementation was marked by a struggle to navigate bureaucracy, vested political interests, climates of xenophobia and sectarianism, and an unfolding military conflict that cast a shadow on the research initiative. The study pushed the researcher to examine privileged understandings of research ethics and elucidated structural, institutional, and societal obstacles beleaguering efforts to support refugees. Many of the challenges of the research process were structural in nature, tethered to the institutional and societal contexts within which the research was conceived and conducted. Some of these entrenched dynamics may be inescapable within the parameters of institutional research, while others may be addressed through greater awareness and preparation. Specifically, researchers studying refugee communities within conflict settings must intentionally reflect on the dynamics that govern refugee politics in the research context. Particular attention must be paid to the elements of xenophobia, violence, and fear that impact participants' autonomy and agency within the study. Intentional engagement with these dynamics cannot insulate the research process from the coercive realities of the refugee experience, yet researchers do have the opportunity to transparently reaffirm their commitments to ethical practice.