TENDENCIES IN DEVELOPING UNIVERSITY RANKINGS AND THE WAYS OF IMPROVING THEM (original) (raw)
Related papers
A study on confronts of global universities ranking
'Being a world class university' is the motto of the majority of the Universities. Ranking have become a popular way to compare higher education institutions performance and productivity. Getting good ranking in the world ranking and maintenance of the same is not an easier task. But the most critical problem is that the presence of unlimited ranking agencies. Both institutions, as well as the stakeholders were in contrast, which ranking should follow to have most realistic information? The ranking is not everything still, it transform some aspects of quality assessment to the whole world. This article critically evaluates the top universities ranking agencies criteria. The top ranked university of India can get the rank in between 200 to 250 in the world list. This article also focuses on the India's preparation for the world ranking and an attempt has been made to look into the solutions considering the management techniques.
Indicators of global university rankings: the theoretical issues
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2019
The main goal of this paper is to determine the significance of identified university ranking indicators in relation to the overall measurement system of selected global ranking systems. The realisation of the research was divided into two phases. The first phase consists of a systematic overview of the literature that has resulted in the identification of 16 global ranking systems. In the second phase, an empirical analysis of 10 active ranking systems which were selected based on the set criteria. The ranking systems are observed regarding their measurement focus. According to the results of empirical analysis, the research category indicators account for 67.93% of the sum of the weight coefficients in the overall measurement system, followed by the reputation category indicators with 13.5% and the web performance category indicators with 9.37%. The most significant number of global ranking systems dominantly puts its focus in the context of measuring research performance as the crucial indicator of the quality and competitiveness of universities.
The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 2017
Recently, many universities have drawn attention to world university rankings, which reflect the international competition of universities and represent their relative statuses. This study does not radically contradict all types of global university rankings but calls for an examination of the effects of their indicators on the final ranking of universities. By using regression analysis, this study investigates the indicator contribution to the ranking of universities in world university ranking systems including the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), Times Higher Education ( THE ), and QS World University Rankings. Results showed that in the ARWU system, three indicators regarding faculty members who won Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals and papers published in Nature and Science and in the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index journals predicted the ranking of universities. For the QS and THE systems, the more powerful contributors to the ranking of uni...
Comparative Analysis for Universities Ranking Systems
Merowe University Journal, 2020
Universities global ranking appears to measure the performance of institutions of higher education through their websites by measuring some indicators such as scientific research, global outlook and presence, faculty staff member, alumni and staff wining Nobel Prizes. This paper describes the history of wellknown international ranking systems and compares four of them to identify their differences. Universities can benefit from these classifications in order to improve their academic and practices and make them stronger. It is very important that universities are interested in innovation and connectivity with the community. We note that universities third mission was not concerned with the ranking systems. The paper found that university rankings systems are accurate if they are made in similar universities or national or regional systems that operate in the same models and similar capabilities. Also, the categories under study did not include criteria to measure the contribution of universities related to industry or provide consultancy and innovations
Global university rankings uncovered: introduction
University rankings have gained growing attention from university administrations and faculty members, markets, governments, mass media and the public at large, affecting nearly all aspects directly or indirectly related to academia. This Theme Section includes 12 essays from 16 authors, coming from 9 countries (i.e. Singapore, the USA, the UK, Ireland, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Cyprus and Greece). These essays cover different methodological, socio-political, economical and ethical 'hot issues' emerging from the dominance of rankings in the higher education sector through the views and thoughts of different stakeholders (i.e. university administrators, people involved in performing the rankings, and scientists). We hope that this Theme Section and the questions it raises will further contribute to the recent debate and future of university rankings, whether they be global or regional, as well as help find the nexus between numbers (i.e. rankings) and knowledge (i.e. higher education institutions); to paraphrase Plato's quote 'a good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers'.
University Rankings: The many sides of the debate.
2014
Within the context of bourgeoning institutions that rank higher education institutions, this paper examines the merits and demerits of university rankings and diverse ranking methodologies.. It explores and presents recent developments and diversification of international rankings and highlights their general trend towards more broadly balanced and multidimensional criteria. The paper concludes that like any other complex endeavour, rankings have their pros and cons but the latter does not justify their abandonment. What is required is public education that builds a discerning user who can optimally gain from the use of rankings while avoiding their pitfalls.
2013: Rankings Criteria and Their Impact on Universities
European University Association, 2013
In the last 10 years, academics around the world have become excessively enthusiatic about world ranking of universities. In developing countries, this has taken a far away interest and exerted pressure upon many universities to enter such ranking system/s. This review by Andrejs Rauhvargers for the European University Association (EUA) is a useful summary and guidlines for the universities to study the requirements and benchmarks required by each knid of the many ranking systems. The purpose and principles of review addresses the most popular global university rankings; providing universities with analysis of the methodologies; only publicly accessible information was used; efforts were made to discover what is actually measured, how the scores for indicators are calculated how the final scores are calculated, and what the results actually mean. For full document on same: See attached pdf which can be downloaded from: https://www.eua.eu/downloads/publications/global%20university%20rankings%20and%20their%20impact%20-%20report%20ii.pdf
The Interacting Role of University Ranking and Globalization of Education
Strides in Development of Medical Education, 2017
Background: Based on the plan of revolution and innovation in medical education that was issued by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education, and the extensive role of such programs in the qualitative promotion of universities, The academic ranking of world universities is of great importance, since the qualitative and quantitative implementation of academic ranking can influence the realization of the university's goals. Hence, the current study aimed at collecting data about the academic ranking of world universities as well as its criteria and indices and their relationship with globalization. Methods: To gain access to reputable databases in university ranking, an extensive search was performed in Google Scholar. Thereafter, after getting access to reputable databases such as Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU), Times higher education world University ranking (THE), Quacquarelli Symonds world University rankings (QS), Webometric, and Islamic world science citation center (ISC), data were collected and classified. Results: Based on the collected data, the history of university rankings and ranking systems, as well as criteria and indices pertaining to the academic ranking of world universities, was derived, and the specificities of the criteria and indices were discussed. Conclusions: University rankings are usually performed on a combination of performance-associated indices and criteria. Efforts to achieve a desirable position based on the criteria and indices of the ranking system play an important role in the promotion of educational quality and globalization.