Introduction: The pragmatics of discourse circulation. Pragmatics and Society 6:2 (2015), 161–174 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Chapter 3: The pragmatic dimension of discourse as articulation
This chapter introduces linguistic pragmatics as a poststructuralist perspective on language use, context and the self. It introduces a notion of articulation enriched by pragmatic insights. Exemplifying the value of his approach, Zienkowski analyses how one of his interviewees delineates boundaries for interpretation in talk about integration policy. He traces pragmatics back to its origins in pragmatism, philosophy of language and enunciative linguistics. The author argues that discourse and language use are characterised by negotiability, variability and adaptability. He considers metapragmatic or metadiscursive awareness to be preconditions for political awareness to emerge. Without an ability to perform and index (one’s relationship to) wider discursive realities by means of metadiscourse, it would be impossible to articulate critique or to engage in political engagement. If your library has access to SpringerLink you may download this chapter or the entire book via the link provided above.
Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics: Their Scope and Relation
Russian Journal of Linguistics
In this article I delve into the seas of the disciplines of Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics, trying to perform the difficult task of delimiting their scope and discussing their common and non-common ground, in order to present a general idea of the state of the art of both disciplines in the 21 st century. Being conscious of the fact that one can learn a great deal about any field by observing what its practitioners do, and precisely because these disciplines are hard to delimit, I also discuss what it is that pragmaticians and discourse analysts actually do. The concepts of text and discourse are explored by looking into different approaches and studies in the areas of Text Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, as well as into how they have evolved from their beginnings to the present time. The main schools of Pragmatics, the Anglo-American and the European Continental (Huang 2016) are also explored, in order to compare their viewpoints and their relationship with the field of discourse analysis. As I see it, Pragmatics is not the same as, but is an indispensable source for, discourse analysis: it would be impossible to analyze any discourse without having a solid basic knowledge of pragmatic phenomena and the ways in which they work and interact (Alba-Juez, 2009: 46). I also examine some concepts and issues that are crucial for the topic of this paper, such as the concepts of context, cognition or culture, and the need to develop pragmatic awareness.
Pragmatic issues in discourse analysis (CADAAD 2007)
Starting from the problems raised by the notion of ‘discourse’ and its definition, this paper takes issue with the views that consider discourse as an object of study observable and describable as a ‘whole’ static structure, and which meaning is richer than the sum of the meanings stemming from the individual utterances composing it. The assumptions previously put forward by authors such as Chafe, who claimed that discourse is better studied as a process unfolding through time, is taken seriously into account. Within the ongoing discussion about the very notion of discourse, some arguments are proposed to sustain the view that all the meaning produced by a given discourse is in fact reducible to the meaning produced by the single utterances composing it; in particular, implicit rhetorical relations are conceived as the result of pragmatic inferences of the same nature as contextual hypotheses in general, and therefore rhetorical relations are to be interpreted at the level of pragmatic meaning.
The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics
2012
The psychology of utterance processing: Context vs salience Rachel Giora 9 Sentences, utterances, and speech acts Mikhail Kissine 10 Pragmatics in update semantics Henk Zeevat 11 The normative dimension of discourse Jaroslav Peregrin 12 Pragmatics in the (English) lexicon Keith Allan 13 Conversational interaction Michael Haugh 14 Experimental investigations and pragmatic theorising Napoleon Katsos Part II Phenomena and applications 15 Referring in discourse Arthur Sullivan 16 Propositional attitude reports: Pragmatic aspects Kasia M. Jaszczolt vi CONTENTS 17 Presupposition and accommodation in discourse Rob van der Sandt 18 Negation Jay David Atlas 19 Connectives Caterina Mauri and Johan van der Auwera 20 Spatial reference in discourse Luna Filipović 21 Temporal reference in discourse Louis de Saussure 22 Textual coherence as a pragmatic phenomenon Anita Fetzer 23 Metaphor and the literal/non-literal distinction Robyn Carston Part III Interfaces and the delimitation of pragmatics 24 Pragmatics in the history of linguistic thought Andreas H. Jucker 25 Semantics without pragmatics? Emma Borg 26 The syntax/pragmatics interface Ruth Kempson 27 Pragmatics and language change Elizabeth Closs Traugott 28 Pragmatics and prosody Tim Wharton 29 Pragmatics and information structure Jeanette K. Gundel 30 Sociopragmatics and cross-cultural and intercultural studies Istvan Kecskes 31 Politeness and pragmatics Marina Terkourafi Notes References Index
Pragmatics, Discourse, and Cognition
2013
While the field of pragmatics includes a great variety of approaches to language use, most pragmatic research can be related to two fairly broad traditions and one recent development : linguistic-philosophical pragmatics (or so-called Anglo-American pragmatics), sociocultural-interactional pragmatics (or so-called European-Continental pragmatics) and intercultural pragmatics. Linguistic-philosophical pragmatics seeks to investigate speaker meaning within an utterance-based framework focusing mainly on linguistic constraints on language use. Sociocultural interactional pragmatics maintains that pragmatics should include research into social and cultural constraints on language use as well. The link between classical philosophically-oriented pragmatics and research in intercultural and inter-language communication has led to the development of intercultural pragmatics, focusing on the roles and functions of language and communication within a world-wide communication network. Intercul...
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 1995
This article inquires into the role of meaning in linguistic pragmatics (conceived in its widest interdisciplinary sense as a cognitive, social, and cultural perspective on language and communication). With reference to earlier discussions of the relationship between meaning and intention, especially in the anthropological linguistic literature, two case studies are adduced in order to further demonstrate the need to allow for types of meaning which do not depend exclusively or primarily on individual intentionality (even when dealing with language use in a mainstream Western context), and also to show how taking nonintentional forms of meaning into account can be done systematically in a theoretically and methodologically justifiable way. The first one focuses on the dynamics of interactional processes, the second on different degrees of salience which even result in direct contradictions between the level of implicit meaning and communicatively transparent information. The conclusion is that a straightforward pragmatic perspective allows linguists to return to the question, What is the meaning of expression X in context Y?, rather than to stick with the Gricean question, What did the language user intend X to mean in context Y?, even though the latter provided a major impetus for the development of the field of pragmatics in the first place.
Procedural pragmatics and the study of discourse
Pragmatics & Cognition, 2007
The termdiscourseis generally used either as a technical equivalent for ‘verbal communication’ or as referring to a particular scientific notion, where discourses are spans of texts or of utterances obeying specific principles of organisation. The aim of this paper is to suggest that an account of discourse is possible, in both cases, only through a theory of utterance-meaning construction. Ifdiscoursestands for verbal communication, then it can be explained only with regard to speaker’s intended meaning. Ifdiscoursestands for organised spans of texts or utterances, then they must be meaningful spans of texts or meaningful utterances. Yet it is argued that a pragmatic explanation of meaning provides all the elements that discourse analysis describes. In the end, the paper claims that a theory of context combined with a theory on the semantic-pragmatic interface should prove sufficient to explain discourse, in whichever sense, along the idea that discourse should be viewed as aproces...
Pragmatics and discourse analysis
Pragmatics, like discourse analysis, goes beyond structural study of the phrase and focuses on higher units -speech acts and conversation turns: What is more, it focuses on its object of study through consideration of the context and its construction, through recognition of speaker intention, and through the establishment of implicit elements which the hearer has to access. In this article, we apply the concept of discourse orientation to certain statements of argumentation made by leading candidates in the November 2003 elections to the Catalan legislature.