Adjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for patients with lymph node-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (original) (raw)

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: Report of intergroup study 0034

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992

To test the efficacy of sequential chemotherapy as an adjuvant to surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for patients with locally-advanced but operable squamous cell cancers of the head and neck region, a randomized clinical trial was conducted under the auspices of the Head and Neck Intergroup (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Southwest Oncology Group, Eastern Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Northern California Oncology Group, and Southeast Group). Eligible patients had completely resected tumors of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. They were then randomized to receive either three cycles of cis-platinum and 5-FU chemotherapy followed by postoperative radiotherapy (CT/RT) or postoperative radiotherapy alone (RT). Patients were categorized as having either "low-risk" or "high-risk" treatment volumes depending on whether the surgical margin was 2 5 mm, there was extracapsular nodal extension, and/or there was carcinoma-in-situ at the surgical margins. Radiation doses of 50-54 Gy were given to "low-risk" volumes and 60 Gy were given to "highrisk" volumes. A total of 442 analyzable patients were entered into this study with the mean-time-at-risk being 45.7 months at the time of the present analysis. The 4-year actuarial survival rate was 44% on the RT arm and 48% on the CT/RT arm (p = n.s.). Disease-free survival at 4 years was 38% on the RT arm compared to 46% on the CT/RT arm (p = n.s.). At 4 years the local/regional failure rate was 29% vs. 26% for the RT and CX'/RT arms, respectively (p = n.s.). The incidence of first failure in the neck nodes was 10% on the RT arm compared to 5% on the CT/RT arm (p = 0.03 without adjusting for multiple testing) and the overall incidence of distant metastases was 23% on the RT arm compared to 15% on the CT/RT arm (p = 0.03). Treatment related toxicity is discussed in detail, but, in general, the chemotherapy was satisfactorily tolerated and did not affect the ability to deliver the subsequent radiotherapy. Implications for future clinical trials are discussed.

Clinical Outcomes of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Undergo Resection, But Forgo Adjuvant Therapy

Anticancer Research

Background/Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who underwent resection and refused the recommended adjuvant therapy. Patients and Methods: Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and time to progression (TTP) were assessed in HNSCC patients treated with surgery who declined some or all adjuvant therapy (refusal group (RG)) compared to those who received the recommended adjuvant therapy (TG). Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months, the 2-year LRRFS was significantly lower in the 17 patients from the RG compared to the 152 patients from the TG: 23.1% vs. 69%, HR=0.30, 95% confidence incidence (CI)=0.15-0.59; p<0.001. The mean TTP was 12 months in the RG and was not reached in the TG (p<0.001). Conclusion: Patients with HNSCC who declined the recommended adjuvant therapy had a recurrence rate of 50% within a year. Adjuvant radiation therapy is the standard of care for resected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with adverse risk factors, such as the presence of multiple involved nodes, inadequate surgical margins, pT3-4 disease, 4885 This article is freely accessible online.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable head and neck cancers: a retrospective audit

ecancermedicalscience

Background: The data regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable head and neck cancer (HNC) is limited and real-world studies are needed to look for the efficacy and toxicities of this approach. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in the Medical Oncology department of our hospital. All technically unresectable HNC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between May 2018 and May 2020 were included in this analysis. Patients received three-drug regimen docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen, two-drug regimens included docetaxel + cisplatin, paclitaxel + carboplatin both weekly and 3-weekly. The resectability assessment was done clinically and radiologically after completing three neoadjuvant cycles. Overall survival was calculated from the first day of chemotherapy to the date of last follow-up or date of death. Results: A total of 119 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the specified time. Response assessment showed partial response in 41.9% of patients with three-drug regimens and 37.5% of patients with other regimens. Out of 119 patients, 56 (47%) patients were offered radical intent therapy. Resectability was achieved in 32.3% of three-drug regimen patients and 26.1% of other patients. Surgery was feasible in 33 (27.7%) patients, and postoperative radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy were done in 30 patients (25.2%), and surgery with only postoperative radiotherapy was done in 3 patients (2.5%). Radical chemoradiotherapy was done in 23 patients (19.3%). The estimated median survival for patients who could undergo surgery was 18 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.9-21.0], and nonsurgical patients were 9 months (95% CI, 7.3-10.6) (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Our study shows that neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable HNC patients can make the disease resectable in around one-third of the patients. The patients who could undergo surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had significantly improved survival as compared to those who could not.

Role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in T4N0 stage IV head and neck cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis

Head & neck, 2018

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (surgery + adjuvant RT) versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (surgery + adjuvant CRT) in patients with T4N0M0, stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Between 1998 and 2011, 3518 and 885 patients were treated with surgery + adjuvant RT and surgery + adjuvant CRT, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) rates were determined and crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Median follow-up was 41.8 months with 2193 reported deaths. The 3-year OS was 67.5% for surgery + adjuvant RT and 70.5% for surgery + adjuvant CRT (P = .013). For negative margins, the corresponding 3-year OS was 70.1% and 74.9% (P = .005). For positive margins, the corresponding 3-year OS was 56.0% and 60.6% (P = .079). On multivariate analysis, the beneficial effect for adjuvant CRT over adjuvant RT was not significant (HR 0.90; CI 0.79-1.03; P = .124). In this...

Adjuvant chemotherapy prior to postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2010

Background and purpose: Induction chemotherapy prior to definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a promising treatment option for unresectable head and neck cancer (HNC). In the postoperative setting, the efficacy of such an approach with adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjCT) followed by postoperative CCRT is unclear. Materials and methods: Forty-one postoperative patients with stage III-IV (M0) HNC enrolled on 3 consecutive phase II clinical trials were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-five of the patients were treated on a protocol which included AdjCT with carboplatin and paclitaxel prior to postoperative CCRT (AdjCT group). Sixteen were treated on protocols with similar postoperative CCRT but without AdjCT (control group). CCRT consisted of paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and twice-daily radiotherapy. Results: After a median follow-up of 72 months, there were no locoregional failures (LRF) or distant metastases (DM) in the AdjCT group. In the control group, there were 2 LRF and 2 DM. The 5-year risk of disease recurrence was 0% in the AdjCT group, compared to 28.9% in the control group (p = 0.0074). No patients had disease progression during AdjCT, and all proceeded to postoperative CCRT without delay. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery followed by CCRT may be a treatment strategy associated with favorable disease outcomes in locoregionally advanced HNC. These results pose a hypothesis which warrants further investigation. Ó

Randomized trial comparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced, nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 10-year update and subset analysis

Cancer, 2015

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to report the long-term results of a trial comparing concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CCRT) with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in patients with stage III/IV nonmetastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were randomized to surgery followed by RT or CCRT. The trial was halted prematurely due to poor accrual. Human papillomavirus status was tested on archival material using polymerase chain reaction sequencing. RESULTS: Of the total of 119 patients, 60 patients were randomized to primary surgery (S arm) and 59 patients were randomized to CCRT (C arm). Human papillomavirus status was tested in 75 patients, and only 3 were found to be positive. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 13 years. Analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated no statistically significant difference in overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS): 5-year rates were 45% versus 35% for overall survival (P 5.262) and 56% versus 46% for DSS (P 5.637) for the S arm and C arm, respectively. Analysis by subsites indicated that this difference favoring the S arm was mainly driven by survival data among patients with cancers of the oral cavity and maxillary sinus. For patients with oral cavity cancer, survival was significantly better in those who underwent primary surgery compared with CCRT; the 5-year DSS rate was 68% versus 12% for the S arm and C arm, respectively (P 5.038). For patients with cancers of the maxillary sinus, the 5-year DSS rate was 71% for patients on the S arm and 0% for patients on the C arm (P 5.05). CONCLUSIONS: These long-term results demonstrate a significant advantage for primary surgery in patients with cancers of the oral cavity or maxillary sinus, providing strong support for primary surgery as the main modality of treatment for these subsites. In other subsites, CCRT and surgery with adjuvant RT were found to demonstrate similar efficacy for survival in patients with advanced resectable tumors. Cancer 2015;

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer

Cancer, 1988

patients with advanced untreated head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with two or three courses of the CABO combination (methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 15; CDDP 50 mg/m2 IV on day 4; bleomycin 10 mg IV on days 1,8, and 15; and vincristine 2 mg IV on days 1,8, and 15 every 3 weeks) prior to surgery and/or radiotherapy. Of the 123 patients evaluable for response to chemotherapy, 19 (15.4%) had a complete remission and 59 (48%) a partial response, yielding a 63.4% overall response rate. Response rate was significantly correlated with the performance status (PS) (P = O.OOl), the stage (P = 0.005), and the T class (P = 0.02X 107 patients completed subsequent local treatment (87 with radiotherapy and 20 with surgery +radiotherapy). The median survival of the 124 patients evaluable for survival was 14.7 months and the overall survival rate at 3 years was 24%. The median survival and the overall survival at 3 years for the surgical subgroup were 24.7 months and 38% and for the radiotherapy subgroup were 14.3 months and 22%. These results were compared with those obtained in a historical control group of 79 patients treated in our institute with short courses of chemotherapy regimens, which did not include cisplatin, followed by radiotherapy (29 patients) or local treatments alone (26 patients with radiotherapy and 24 patients with surgery k radiotherapy) between January 1976 and December 1980. Most of the patient characteristics were evenly distributed (age, sex, and primary sites) except that more advanced lesions were included in the NAC group (Stage IV. 85% versus 62%; T4: 65% versus 42%; N2-3: 48% versus 29%). The overall survival was significantly higher in patients receiving NAC than in the historical control group, comparing both the groups taken as a whole (P < 0.05) and the surgery f radiotherapy (P < 0.05) and the radiotherapy (P < 0.02) subgroups.

Radical Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of Prognostic and Therapeutic Factors

Clinical Oncology, 2006

Aims: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to be a leading cancer in developing countries. Definitive radiation therapy either primary or as postoperative adjuvant is offered to most patients. We aimed to identify prognostic and therapeutic factors that affect locoregional control and survival in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell cancers. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 568 previously untreated patients with squamous head and neck cancers, who received radical radiotherapy between 1990 and 1996, using local control, locoregional control and disease-free survival (DFS) as outcome measures. Results: With a median follow-up of 18 months for living patients, the 5-year local control, locoregional control and DFS for all 568 patients were 53%, 45% and 41%, respectively, for all stages combined. The 5-year local control, locoregional control and DFS as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage grouping were 78%, 70% and 70%; 64%, 59% and 57%; 51%, 42% and 37%; and 40%, 27% and 22% from stages I to IV, respectively, with highly significant P values. Patients receiving higher doses (R66 Gy) had a significantly better outcome compared with lower doses. The 5-year local control (59% vs 48%, P [ 0.0015), locoregional control (47% vs 41%; P [ 0.0043) and DFS (44% vs 37%; P [ 0.0099) were significantly better in patients receiving R66 Gy. Site of primary also affected outcome significantly, with oral cavity lesions faring badly. Conclusion: Tumour stage remains the most important factor affecting outcome in radical radiotherapy of HNSCC. A definite doseeresponse relationship exists with higher total doses, leading to better local control, locoregional control and DFS in all stages. Site of primary affects outcome too, with laryngeal primaries doing well and oral cavity cancers faring the worst.