"Indianization" from the Indian Point of View: Trade and Cultural Contacts with Southeast Asia in the Early First Millennium C.E. (original) (raw)

Htein Win -The Indianization of Southeast Asia: Cultural, Religious, and Political Influences

Geopolitics, 2024

The Indianization of Southeast Asia refers to the profound cultural, religious, and political influences that Indian civilization exerted on the region from the early centuries of the Common Era until the 13th century. This process, characterized by indirect influence through trade, migration, and diplomacy rather than conquest, shaped various aspects of Southeast Asian societies. This paper explores the economic foundations of Indianization, including maritime trade routes and the role of merchant communities, before delving into the rich cultural influences that manifested in language, art, architecture, and social practices. Additionally, the spread of Hinduism and Buddhism is examined, highlighting syncretism and local adaptations that emerged from the blending of Indian and indigenous spiritual traditions. Political influences, including concepts of kingship, legal systems, and the formation of Indianized kingdoms, are also analyzed. Case studies of notable Indianized kingdoms such as Funan, the Khmer Empire, and Srivijaya provide concrete examples of Indianization's impact. The paper concludes with reflections on the decline of Indian influence in the region and the enduring legacy that continues to shape modern Southeast Asia, along with suggestions for future research directions in understanding the complexities of cultural exchange.

Indianisation or Localisation: Indian Influences in Southeast Asia

This paper will discuss the process of Indianisation in Southeast Asia, by looking into the unique variations of its process in the region and exploring some Indianised elements. This paper will also attempt to understand the terms, Indianisation and localisation, and determine which concept best describes this remarkable phenomenon.

Early Indian Influence in Southeast AsiaRevitalizing Partnership between India and Indonesia

India Quarterly a Journal of International Affairs, 2010

Southeast Asia has always been socially and culturally diverse, making accommodation easy. The indigenous people shaped adaptation and adoption of outside influences and sought out concepts and practices that enhanced rather than redirected changes already underway in their own societies. This was the result of a process that fundamentally changed the cultural composition and the indigenous traditions of the Southeast Asianists. The distinctive cultural pattern of India succeeded in striking roots in the Southeast Asian region. The result was an imposing array of architectural and other cultural marvels with indigenous interpretations. Under this background, this article studies the impact of early Indian influence on Southeast Asia. It further discovers Indias relation with one of its oldest ally-Indonesia-and proposes strategies for constructive re-engagement for revitalizing partnership.

Spread of Hinduism in East & Southeast Asia

Spread of Hinduism in East & Southeast Asia , 2024

India's burgeoning trade since around 500 BCE resulted in extended socioeconomic and cultural diffusion of initially Hindu, and later Buddhist philosophy and practices in Southeast Asia's existing indigenous belief systems. Largely the spread of Hinduism was peaceful through absorption by the indigenous cultures, however, there were instances of conquests by Indian kings in the region. The local adoption of the more advanced Indian culture was called Indianization. Nearly all nations of the region came under this influence, becoming part of Greater India (Akhand Bharat). By the early centuries of the Common Era, most of the kingdoms and principalities till the Philippines archipelago had absorbed salient aspects of Hindu religion, culture, and administration. The concept of divine god-kingship was adopted through the concept of Devaraja, Sanskrit language and other Indian epigraphic systems that were made official like those of the southern Indian empires. These Indianized Kingdoms - a term coined by George Coedès in his work Histoire ancienne des états hindouisés d'Extrême-Orient - were characterised by surprising resilience, political integrity, and administrative stability. In the north, Indian religious thought and culture were assimilated into the existing religious philosophy of the peoples across the Hindu Kush mountains, most profoundly in Tibet and Bhutan. Hindu and Buddhist religious concepts and practices extended into Afghanistan - a part of India at that time - and other parts of Central Asia and Asia Minor. Religious texts and beliefs were also absorbed in China and Japan to the east, largely through the land route.

THEORIES OF INDIANIZATION Exemplified by Selected Case Studies from Indonesia (Insular Southeast Asia)

Too preoccupied with illustrating the influence of Brahmanism, Buddhism and Sanskrit in Southeast Asia most theories of "indianization" seem to undervalue the "recipient" cultures and societies. On account of a more or less marked "high culture-centrism" Southeast Asian cultures and religions are measured with the classical expressions of Indian religions available in written records such as the Vedas, Upanishads, Purânas, Samhitas etc. Owing to this "high culture-bias", these theories of indianization are insufficient to be able to explain the indianization of Southeast Asian societies as creative socio-cultural adaptations. Conditio sine qua non for a deep understanding of the dynamics, reasons and meanings of the indianization is a sound knowledge of Indian cultures and religions as well as an intimate knowledge of Southeast Asian societies, cultures and religions. The "anthropological approach of indianization" advocated in this paper is illustrated by selected examples from Indonesia. In the center of interest, however, is the deification of rulers under the title Singamangaraja among the Toba-Batak, a tribal people in Sumatra, by means of adoption, transformation and adaptation of Indian concepts, seemingly a striking antithesis to the egalitarian structure of the kinship-based Toba-Batak society. Singamangaraja worshipped as incarnation of Batara Guru were divine kings going back to different sources of indianization, but at least partly deriving from very ancient traditions of sacral rulers.

India and Southeast Asia: Geographic and Cultural Connections

India and Southeast Asia: Historical and Contemporary Relations, 2023

This paper considers the shared geographic and cultural traits of India and Southeast Asia, from a historical and archaeological perspective. The citation for this article is Pratap, A. 2023. India and Southeast Asia: Geographic and Cultural Connections. In Gupta, S and Seth, N (Ed.) India and Southeast Asia. Historical and Cultural Connections. Bilingual Publication. Pustak Bharati. Toronto. Pp. 1-10.

Globalizing Indian religions and Southeast Asian Localisms

This paper employs “globalization” theory, dynamically incorporating space and time, geography and history, to challenge the notion that the development of Southeast Asian cultures along the global sea-faring arc between India and China can be best explained by constructing narratives derived from these major civilisations. The archaeological record shows a complex inventory of contacts and exchanges of goods and ideas from China and India intersecting in Southeast Asia. While globally-based trade and religion were formative, the region’s indigenous resources and cultures not only provided attractive destinations and way-stations, but also molded non-native inputs to the dynamics of already extant socio-cultural systems. The arrival of Buddhism and Brahmanism on Southeast Asian shores is framed within this context and four regions are selected to highlight these processes: the Pyu in Myanmar, Dvaravati in Thailand, the Thai-Malay peninsula, and Pre-Angkorian Cambodia from the mid-first millennium CE onwards. Southeast Asians successfully managed the twin processes of globalization and localism, adapting Buddhist and Brahmanical practices to suit their situations. These fusions facilitated transformations of Southeast Asian societies, setting them on trajectories leading to the formation of fully fledged, unique Buddhist and Brahmanical states such as Angkor in Cambodia, Bagan in Myanmar, and Sukhothai in Thailand.

Contacts between Ancient India and Southeast Asia

Contacts between Ancient India and Southeast Asia Having attained political and cultural unity at an early stage in the history of the world, India was able to assist and impress its neighbouring lands in Asia. This process is generally called Indianization. Southeast Asia is the most shining example of this process of Indianization "by which the peoples of western Southeast Asia came to think of themselves as part of Bhāratavarṣa… [and which] represents one of the most impressive instances of large-scale acculturation in the history of the world" (Wheatley 1982: 27-28). Indianization of Southeast Asia was almost entirely peaceful and did not amount to conquest. It also took place as much through the initiative and adaptation of the Southeast Asians as it was made possible by the Indians through commerce and cultural entrepreneurship. Every sphere of Southeast Asian culture and civilization has received its inspiration from India. Today a majority of the population in the countries of Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam follows Buddhism. Hinduism is practised by a majority of the people of Bali island as well as the Cham people of Vietnam. Though officially Buddhist, many Thai, Khmer, and Myanmarese people have also adopted not only Hindu devas and asuras but also associated mythology in a form of syncretism. Even today monarchies such as the royal courts of Thailand and Cambodia proudly make use not only of Sanskrit but also have various Hindu rituals performed by the Hindu Brāhmaṇas for the kings as well as the royal families. Garuḍa, the bird-like mythological figure and vehicle mount (vāhana) of Lord Viṣṇu, has a place of honour in the coats of arms of both Indonesia and Thailand. Kaharingam, the religion of the Dayak people of Borneo, is considered in Indonesia as being an indigenized version of Hinduism. Muay Thai, the art of eight limbs, which is also known as Thai Boxing and is a combat sport in Thailand, is the Thai version of the Brāhmaṇical-Hindu Musti-yuddha style of martial art. It is known as Lethwei in Mynamar, Muay Lao in Laos, Tomoi in Malaysia, and Pradal Serey in Cambodia. The stories of the Wayang shadow puppets as well as classical dance-dramas of Indonesia, Cambodia, Thailand, and Malaysia have liberal borrowings from the different episodes of the Indian epics, the Rāmāyaṇa and the Mahābhārata. Several ancient temples in Southeast Asia such as the Angkor Wat of Siem Riep in Cambodia, which was dedicated to the Hindu god Lord Viṣṇu, borrowed abundantly from the Indian Hindu temple architecture. Now the Angkor Wat has a place of pride in the flag of Cambodia. Similarly, Prambanan (Rara Jonggrang) in Central Java is the largest Hindu temple in Indonesia that is dedicated to the Trimūrti-Brahmā (Creator), Viṣṇu (Preserver), and Śiva (Transformer). Indonesia's Borobudur in Central Java is the largest Buddhist monument in the world. It has been built as a giant stone maṇḍala topped with magnificent stūpas. This monument is a harmonious union of Indian notions rooted in Buddhism as well as the earlier indigenous Austronesian megalithic tradition of building a stepped-pyramid. Most remarkably, the minarets of some of the mosques in Indonesia belonging to the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, such as the Grand Mosque of Demak and Kudus Mosque, bear an uncanny resemblance to the towers of the Majapahit Hindu temples.