Acute flank pain: A modern approach to diagnosis and management (original) (raw)
1999, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
Acute flank pain is a common and complex clinical problem. In addition to flank pain caused by ureterolithiasis, other urinary and extraurinary abnormalities can result in a similar clinical picture. Unenhanced CT can rapidly, accurately, and safely determine the presence or absence of ureteral obstruction. When obstruction is caused by ureterolithiasis, CT allows precise determination of stone size and location. These are the two most important factors used for patient management. In addition to direct stone visualization, there are many secondary CT signs of ureteral obstruction that are direct manifestations of the underlying pathophysiology. On the other hand, when obstruction is absent, CT can diagnose or exclude most other abnormalities that result in flank pain. As a result of its many advantages, unenhanced helical CT should become the dominant imaging modality for evaluation of all patients with acute flank pain in whom a clinical diagnosis is uncertain.
Related papers
Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography
Radiology, 1995
To compare non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and intravenous urography (IVU) in the evaluation of patients who present with acute flank pain and in whom ureteric obstruction is suspected. The findings at non-contrast-enhanced CT and IVU in 20 patients with acute flank pain were compared for the presence or absence of ureteric obstruction and delineation of ureteric stones. Twelve of the 20 patients had non-contrast-enhanced CT and IVU findings consistent with ureteric obstruction. Of these 12 patients, five had a ureteric stone that was demonstrated on both non-contrast-enhanced CT scans and IVU radiographs, six had a stone that was depicted on non-contrast-enhanced CT scans only, and in one patient a stone could not be delineated definitively on either non-contrast-enhanced CT scans or IVU radiographs. Eight patients had findings at non-contrast-enhanced CT and IVU consistent with the absence of obstruction. Non-contrast-enhanced CT is more effective than IVU in precis...
Radiology, 1997
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of plain radiography for the detection of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) as the standard of reference. Plain radiographs and helical CT scans of 178 patients with acute flank pain were reviewed retrospectively. Three interpretations of plain radiographs were used: (a) Original reading. This was the report made at the time of the patient's evaluation before the patient underwent CT. (b) Blinded retrospective reading. Each plain radiograph was interpreted without knowledge of the CT findings. (c) Unblinded retrospective reading. The plain radiograph of each patient whose CT scan showed a stone was reviewed with the CT scan. The original reading had a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 77% for the detection of ureteral calculi. The blinded retrospective reading had a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 71%. The unblinded retrospective reading had a sensitivity of 59% (95% confidence inte...
JOURNAL OF PEOPLES UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES FOR WOMEN (JPUMHS), 2023
BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis is the most common urinary tract disease and acute flank's pain is one of the most common symptoms of it. Urolithiasis affects both gender of all age groups but most common affected category was found to be the male. Computed Tomography is a gold standard modality and has great role for urolithiasis detection during KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) scan. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the role of Computed Tomography KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) in the detection of Urolithiasis in patients with acute flank's pain and to identify the presence of renal tract calculi in KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) to confirm that which part is more affected due to calculus presences. METHOD: A cross sectional study with consecutive sampling was carried out at Department of Radiology, Medical Teaching Institute Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Pakistan from October 2022 to March 2023. 150 patients aged between 20-60 years presenting with acute flank's pain were included in the study. Ethical approval was obtained. CT KUB of the patient was performed with 128 slices GE Computed Tomography (CT) scan machine on full urinary bladder in supine position 1 cm above the liver through symphysis pubis, used scan parameters technique 120 kV/Auto mA, 0.5 rotation with Standard Algorithm, 4 mm slice thickness and was taken field of view (FOV) according to the patient size. Axial, coronal and sagittal images are taken and soft-tissue window with 2 mm coronal and sagittal was also reconstructed. RESULTS: In total 150 patients presenting with acute flank's pain, 273 stones were detected during CT KUB. The highest number of patients referred by Urologist (60.7%) followed by ER Physician (39.3%). Stones lie in renal calyx (32.7%), renal pelvis (36.7%) and ureter (30.7%). The presence of stones is higher in right kidney (51.4%) as compare to left kidney (38.6%) whereas in right ureter found more stones (17.9%) as compare to left ureter (14.7%). Obstructive Nephrolithiasis was reported to be (27.3%) and non-obstructive (72.7%). According to stone size, majority belongs to 6-10 mm (36.7%). The range of mean attenuation value (HU) was from 301-600 HU having (42.2%) and in most cases single stone were reported (51.3%). Hydronephrosis (65.3%) were the most common secondary signs of obstruction followed by Hydroureter (26.7%) and Perinephric stranding (23.4%). CONCLUSION: Computed Tomography KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) has main role and is key for detection and diagnosis of Urolithiasis. It helps to provide detail information for further treatment plans.
Chang Gung medical journal
The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness and optimal cutoff point of decreased renal parenchymal density (DRD) for diagnosis of ureteral stone disease (USD) in emergent patients with acute flank pain. A total of 85 emergency patients with acute flank pain who underwent unenhanced helical computed tomography (UHCT) were prospectively included in this study as the study group. An additional 30 patients with no USD undergoing UHCT were retrospectively included as the control group. The mean parenchymal density difference between both kidneys of the control group was compared to that of the study group. Within the study group, the DRD of patients with USD and with no USD was compared. The sensitivities and specificities of DRD for diagnosis of USD in a range of possible optimal cutoff points were analyzed. There was a statistically significant difference in DRD between the study and control groups (p < 0.0001). In the study group, the DRD of patients with USD was sig...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.