‘Pedagogy of discomfort’ and its ethical implications: the tensions of ethical violence in social justice education (original) (raw)
Related papers
Violence and the Moral Order in Contemporary Schooling: A Discursive Analysis
Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2010
A major strength of qualitative research is its capacity to re-theorise a particular field through examining the discursive constructions that underpin a particular body of research. The empirical research literature construes student violence generally, but bullying in particular, as a psychosocial problem arising from individual and family pathologies. In this article, drawing on the work of Foucault and Butler, we engage in a discursive analysis of the bullying discourse as it appears in the literature and in teachers' and students' commentaries on incidents of bullying. A discursive analysis enables us to ask whether there is some limitation or inherent problem in the conceptual configuration of the field, and to ask how else the problem might be understood. We begin that discursive work in order to open up new ways of thinking about, and acting in relation to, school violence.
Teaching in the Contact Zone: Ethical Violence and Critical Pedagogy
This paper mobilises contact zone theory (Pratt 1991) as a discursive frame to explore critical pedagogy in the Humanities and Education. Understanding privilege and its implication for the perpetuation of structural inequality in the contact zone of the classroom will be explored. It outlines the challenges and discomfort students face when confronted by their own sense of complicity in oppression (Boler and Zembylas, 2003). Teaching critical pedagogy plays a key role in overturning discrimination, however considerations on the process by which this is achieved is scant in the literature. Tutors applying critical pedagogy in Higher Education settings should remain cautious of ethical violence in attempts to transform students understanding of structural privilege. This paper explores how tutors can employ contact zone theory in the Humanities and Education with the aid of storytelling devices without risking ethical violence.
Symbolic and institutional violence and critical educational spaces: in the name of education
This article will explore how symbolic and institutional violence shaped students’ understandings of themselves within the educational context, and will argue that the creation of critical educational spaces can enable students and teachers to explore and transgress the internal and external influences and violence that shape the learning experience. Bourdieu’s construction of symbolic power, violence and the institution will be employed to illustrate the complex and contradictory ways in which schools and their representatives commit egregious acts against students under the guise of benevolence. The article will also illustrate how the development of a critical educational space in a magnet program entitled the ‘Becoming Teachers Program’ enabled students and teachers to transgress and combat the normative and oppressive relations of the institution as a result of and in response to school violence, and pose some considerations for how we approach teaching for peace and social justice.
Qualitative Inquiry, 2019
In this article, we begin with a story in which a teacher is perceived as cruel, a boy experiences exclusion, and a support worker feels guilty for not responding. Working together with students, we have written a play script that explores the entangled intra-active perceptions of the various players. The script was used in the professional development of educators as a means of exploring the diffractive movements through which differences are made in inclusive classrooms. It opens the possibility of moving away from thinking in terms of individual accountability toward an intra-active exploration of the ethics of such encounters.
Africa Education Review, 2014
Education for transformation and social justice calls for critical, reflective, imaginative and independent thinkers with enquiring minds and a strong sense of curiosity – the ends and means of what Jonathan Jansen calls a ‘pedagogy to disrupt’ and Gert Biesta a ‘pedagogy of interruption’. For this reason, I introduced an innovative pedagogy in some of my courses at the School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg – the internationally established ‘community of enquiry’ pedagogy. I report on how in an Ethics course the pedagogy opened up a space for undergraduate students to disclose their own experiences of corporal punishment in the schools where they were placed for teaching practice. The pedagogy made room for a critical incident to emerge that was painful for both tutors and students, but, as I argue, crucial for participation, inclusion and the demands of open-mindedness, critical thinking and also solidarity required in a deliberative democracy.
Visibility and invisibility of violence in education
STUDIA Z TEORII WYCHOWANIA TOM XIV: 2023 NR 2 (43), 2023
The article describes the connections between theoretical assumptions concerning teaching freedom and the role of authority in education. It also presents Rene Girard's idea of sacrificial crisis and uses it as an interpretative technique to understand conceptual, bureaucratic, and neoliberal forms of hiding violence. Finally, the author formulates remarks concerning the importance of making violence visible and distinguishing between its manifold forms and cases.
Teaching sensitive topics: Transformative pedagogy in a violent society
Collins, A. (2013) Teaching sensitive topics: transformative pedagogy in a violent society. Alternation (9) 128-149., 2013
This paper explores problems and possibilities in teaching courses that raise deep emotional issues for the participants. Two courses were developed to examine violence in South Africa, and provide social and psychological support for victims. It became clear that most of the students were themselves survivors of violence, and that the courses triggered powerful emotional reactions and shifts in self-understanding. This presented a danger that the participants would be overwhelmed by negative emotional responses to the course materials in ways that could be psychologically traumatic and also undermine their potential learning experiences. The challenge was thus to develop a teaching model which allowed more positive emotional engagement with the course materials. This entailed exploring critical pedagogy as personal transformation and empowerment, and integrating the psychotherapeutic idea of providing a safe space for emotional healing. This allowed students to engage with the materials in a deeply personal way while maintaining a supportive environment that fostered increasing intellectual and emotional self insight and autonomy.
Between the Visceral and the Lie : Lessons on Teaching Violence
2020
Drawing from two qualitative case studies, one researching how teachers teach about war to the children of soldiers and the other examining how teachers teach lynching near historic lynching sites, this critical phenomenological study weighs how much horror and how much hope should be taught if the aim of the instruction is a liberating education. The author argues that a balance of both is necessary. Students cannot be left in the hopelessness of knowledge alone but must also be taught how to engage their world with the possibility of making change.
Pedagogy‐as‐Justice, 2023
My main task here is to ideally make readers question whether a ”smeared thinker”* is in fact one who commits to authentic philosophizing. *(smeared because of their public engagements and attempts to expose structures of unjust reasonings such as “war”). Nassim Noroozi proposes a juxtaposition of pedagogy with and a characterization of it as justice. The term pedagogical here is not limited to “the educational,” nor is pedagogy limited to the methods of teaching. At the same time, the term justice will not be framed in terms of liberal conceptual grounds. Noroozi defines pedagogy as an arrangement of meaning so that it becomes impossible not to see injustice. Noroozi argues that “pedagogy-as-justice” concerns itself with exposing injustice in transformative ways, and as such it is an ethical undertaking. She explores how philosophizing for struggle is inherently pedagogical and, because of our perception of “the pedagogical,” how it is inherently transformative. Furthermore, she argues that seeing pedagogy as justice will consequentially deem “the arrangements of meanings to engage others in the issues pertaining to injustice” as equally important to writing or thinking about those struggles. To illustrate the above points, Noroozi analyzes a case of public philosophical engagement against war. By expanding on this case, she proposes some central attributes of pedagogy-as-justice, namely its preoccupation with grounding abstract and anonymous concepts in their contested historical realities; its commitment to wrestling with an “opacity of concepts” or with “dishonest reasonings” that end up promoting suffering and injustice; and its recognition of the precarities inherent in undertaking pedagogy-as-justice. Noroozi traces a genealogy of the concept of pedagogy-as-justice going back to Socratic public philosophical engagements.