A Transformation Group and Its Subgroups (trilogy of theory of dimensionality #2 (full paper)) (original) (raw)

2015, Communications in Applied Geometry

We discuss a transformation as follows. There is a point on the number line, then we move it on an integer m to another one n on the number line. We denote the transformation with mTn. We think of all the elements G = { mTn | m, n in Z } m}Z. Then, we discuss the binary operation lTn = lTmmTn. It denotes the repetition of transformation. G makes a group under the binary operation. This is a modeling of group in [1] on the number line. In this paper, we think of the subgroups. 2010 MathematicsSubjectClassification. 20A10. Corrigendum: In the proof of Proposition 2.1., strictly speaking, the right cosets Hg={2k-1T2n} "where 2n is fixed" and H'g'={2kT2n-1} "where 2n-1 is fixed." Remark. In Proposition 2. 2., {mT0} cup {0Tm} itself can’t be obviously a group. For example, -mT00Tm = -mTm is not in {mT0} cup {0Tm}.

The invariants of the Clifford groups

2000

The automorphism group of the Barnes-Wall lattice L_m in dimension 2^m (m not 3) is a subgroup of index 2 in a certain ``Clifford group'' C_m (an extraspecial group of order 2^(1+2m) extended by an orthogonal group). This group and its complex analogue CC_m have arisen in recent years in connection with the construction of orthogonal spreads, Kerdock sets, packings

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.