Letter to the Editor (original) (raw)
Related papers
Simultaneous multiple journal submissions: The case against
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1994
ABSTRACT. Because joHmfl/sare taking so long to review submissions, proposals have been made that authors be permitted to send the same paper to several journals at once. This paper argues that such a reform is ill-advised. !n particular, it will fail to speed up the reviewing ...
2018
BACKGROUND: Publication speeds of clinically relevant veterinary journals have not been evaluated. METHODS: We compared 23 prominent veterinary journals to 11 comparable medical and 4 high-impact science journals and examined select factors that might affect these speeds. Submission date, acceptance date and first online publication date were recorded for 50 sequentially identified research articles from each journal that had been published immediately prior to April 26, 2018. Intervals from submission to acceptance, acceptance to publication, and submission to publication were calculated in days for each article. Data were compared visually across all journals, and statistically by field (veterinary, medical, high-impact), by impact factor and by publisher (commercial vs society) to identify trends or differences in publication intervals. RESULTS: When assessed by field, intervals from submission to acceptance (p=0.18), acceptance to publication (p=0.75) and submission to publicati...
Cureus, 2022
Introduction: Difficulty in finding the appropriate journal, adherence to the formatting differences between various journals, publication fees, delay in acceptance/rejection, etc., are a few reasons due to which much research is not published or when published the data in the research may become outdated. There are no studies to find out the issues which affect the time delay between study completion, submission to the journal, acceptance by the journal, and publication. With this background, we conducted this study. Methods: This study was exempted by the Ethics committee as it was based on online data. Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2020 (Clarivate analytics), CiteScore, and Google Scholar were used to sort the high-, moderate-, and low-impact factor journals. Forty-five journals each from high-, medium-and low-impact factors (h-index median, Google Scholar Metrics h5-index) were selected. Similarly, 15 predatory scientific journals were chosen. Journals with medical science backgrounds were chosen by randomization. Only original research articles were included. From each journal, five articles were chosen randomly from the latest issue pre-pandemic. The search was performed from April 2021 to June 2021. Variables analyzed were indexing of the journal, publication fees, level of impact factor, specialty domain, number of editors, frequency per year, date of study completion, date of submission, date of acceptance, date of publication, and h-index median. Data were compiled in Microsoft Excel Workbook (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Variables of time were represented as median and interquartile range, and the number of journals and processing fees for publication were descriptively analyzed. Results: Out of 60 journals selected, 300 original articles were analyzed. There were 26 specialty-wise journals; the commonest was multispecialty journals. The fastest time from study completion to submission, submission to acceptance, submission to publication, and acceptance to publication was 15.5, 30, 61, and 0 days, respectively, and the slowest duration was 1636, 452, 615, and 456 days, respectively. PubMed indexed journals had a higher number of editors, h5-index, and h5 median, and slower time for acceptance and publication compared to non-PubMed indexed journals (p<0.05). Predatory journals had a lower h5-index and h5 median along with faster time to acceptance and publication compared to high and moderate impact factor journals (p<0.05). Journal with faster acceptance had faster publication as well (r=0.85), but no impact of the number of editors, number of issues per year (frequency), and publication fees with time to acceptance and publication. Conclusion: Though PubMed indexed journals with a greater number of editors and high fees are slower to publish articles but they are a safe option for researchers. The impact factor does not effect the speed of publication for non-predatory journals. Paying high fees and choosing a journal with more issues per year does not ensure quick publication to the researchers.
Are delays in academic publishing necessary? Comment on Leslie (AER, 2005)
2010
Abstract Leslie (AER, 2005) shows that both submission fees and time delays at top-tier journals can maximize journal quality by discouraging long-shot submissions. He concludes that delays in academic publishing are not necessary, and argues that journals should increase submission fees in an effort to minimize delays. We show that his conclusions depend crucially on the assumption that submission costs affect all authors equally.
Scientometrics, 2019
We aimed to assess publication speed of manuscripts submitted to general medical journals and to explore the link with various author, paper and journal characteristics. In this retrospective study of bibliometric data we retrieved 45 randomly selected papers published in 2016 from each of the highest impact factor journals of general internal medicine (n = 9) and primary care (n = 9). Only journals reporting submission and publication dates were included. The following data were extracted: first author (gender, place of affiliation, number of publications), paper (submission and publication dates, online publication, open access, number of authors, number of participants, study design, study results) and journal characteristics (impact factor, number of papers published). We computed for each paper the submission-to-acceptance, acceptance-to-publication and submission-to-publication times. We performed linear regression with random effects models to identify the associations with predictors, adjusting for intra-cluster correlations. A total of 781 papers were included. The overall median submission-to-acceptance time was 123 days (interquartile range 111, min 1, max 922), acceptance-to-publication time 68 days (interquartile range 88, min 2, max 802) and submission-to-publication time 224 days (interquartile range 156, min 24, max 1034). In multivariate analysis, online publication was strongly associated with reduced submission-to-publication time (difference: − 93 days, p value < 0.001). This study provides insight into the submission-to-acceptance, acceptance-to-publication and submission-to-publication times in general medical journals. Researchers interested in reducing publication delays should focus on journals with online publication.
Manuscript Submission and Evaluation: Journal Characterization and Editors' Perception
Scientific journals have a great geographic reach and are used for reporting research, intended to the progress of science. As well as the research, the quality and reliability of journals should be also considered. The scientific community follows guidelines, codes of conduct in research and best practices to support its activities. Since the level of demand of quality scientific journals is constantly increasing, the editor plays a fundamental role in this scenario. Thus, this work will show the importance of the editor's management for the quality of the journal.
Time Matters What Factors Affect Submission To Acceptance Time in the Journal of Communication
2024
This article analyses the possible factors that can affect the time range in two scenarios of the publication process, namely the number of days between submitting a manuscript and its acceptance (n = 42) and the number of days between submitting a research paper and it being published (n = 101) in the Journal of Communication. Regression analyses revealed that some factors significantly affect the time period between the submission and the acceptance of papers. The most important finding is that the number of articles previously published in the Journal of Communication by the most prestigious authors significantly reduces the time between submission and the “decision accepted” response.